我们有多“好”?运用技术与职业沟通理论和残疾公平,通过联合招聘挑战招聘广告中的跨部门消融

IF 1.5 4区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Technical Communication Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.55177/tc415335
Kristy C. Bennett
{"title":"我们有多“好”?运用技术与职业沟通理论和残疾公平,通过联合招聘挑战招聘广告中的跨部门消融","authors":"Kristy C. Bennett","doi":"10.55177/tc415335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:This article integrates an ableism studies framework with disability justice principles to interrogate how medical insurance job advertisements may circulate ableist assumptions that impede corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) goals and social justice efforts.\n Method: I use critical discourse analysis and thematic coding to analyze how normative ableist assumptions present in job advertisements and DEI documents may exclude prospective employees with disabilities as well as multiply marginalized identities such as Black women. Results:\n Through my analysis, I demonstrate how normalizing assumptions related to productivity, rationality, independence, and corporate assimilation may contribute to the exclusion of multiply marginalized employees. Conclusion: I ultimately provide data-driven insights regarding what I refer\n to ascoalitional recruitment to help practitioners construct more equitable job advertisements attuned to disability justice.","PeriodicalId":46338,"journal":{"name":"Technical Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How \\\"Well\\\" are We DEI-ing? Applying Technical and Professional Communication Theory and Disability Justice to Challenge Intersectional Ableism in Job Advertisements Through Coalitional Recruitment\",\"authors\":\"Kristy C. Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.55177/tc415335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose:This article integrates an ableism studies framework with disability justice principles to interrogate how medical insurance job advertisements may circulate ableist assumptions that impede corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) goals and social justice efforts.\\n Method: I use critical discourse analysis and thematic coding to analyze how normative ableist assumptions present in job advertisements and DEI documents may exclude prospective employees with disabilities as well as multiply marginalized identities such as Black women. Results:\\n Through my analysis, I demonstrate how normalizing assumptions related to productivity, rationality, independence, and corporate assimilation may contribute to the exclusion of multiply marginalized employees. Conclusion: I ultimately provide data-driven insights regarding what I refer\\n to ascoalitional recruitment to help practitioners construct more equitable job advertisements attuned to disability justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55177/tc415335\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55177/tc415335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文将残疾歧视研究框架与残疾公正原则相结合,探讨医疗保险招聘广告如何传播残疾歧视假设,从而阻碍公司的多样性、公平和包容(DEI)目标和社会公正的努力。方法:我使用批判性话语分析和主题编码来分析招聘广告和DEI文件中出现的规范性残疾主义假设如何排除潜在的残疾员工以及许多边缘化身份,如黑人妇女。结果:通过我的分析,我展示了与生产力、理性、独立性和公司同化相关的正常化假设如何有助于排除许多边缘化员工。结论:我最终提供了数据驱动的见解,关于我所说的联合招聘,以帮助从业者构建更公平的招聘广告,以适应残疾人正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How "Well" are We DEI-ing? Applying Technical and Professional Communication Theory and Disability Justice to Challenge Intersectional Ableism in Job Advertisements Through Coalitional Recruitment
Purpose:This article integrates an ableism studies framework with disability justice principles to interrogate how medical insurance job advertisements may circulate ableist assumptions that impede corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) goals and social justice efforts. Method: I use critical discourse analysis and thematic coding to analyze how normative ableist assumptions present in job advertisements and DEI documents may exclude prospective employees with disabilities as well as multiply marginalized identities such as Black women. Results: Through my analysis, I demonstrate how normalizing assumptions related to productivity, rationality, independence, and corporate assimilation may contribute to the exclusion of multiply marginalized employees. Conclusion: I ultimately provide data-driven insights regarding what I refer to ascoalitional recruitment to help practitioners construct more equitable job advertisements attuned to disability justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technical Communication
Technical Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Heuristics for Equitable Technical Communication in Remote & Hybrid Game Development How-To in Short-Form: A Framework for Analyzing Short-Format Instructional Content on TikTok Determining Levels of Prescriptivism in American English Usage Guides From Interpersonal Privacy to HumanTechnological Privacy: Communication Privacy Management Theory Revisited The Technical Communicator as Artist: Rhetoric, Aesthetics, and Form in the Workplace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1