全膝关节置换术中闭孔神经和外导管联合阻滞术后镇痛

D. Şeyda, A. Yeşim, E. Veysel, Seven Seda
{"title":"全膝关节置换术中闭孔神经和外导管联合阻滞术后镇痛","authors":"D. Şeyda, A. Yeşim, E. Veysel, Seven Seda","doi":"10.23937/2377-4630/1410088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to evaluate adding an obturator nerve block to adductor canal block may reduce tramadol consumption (primary endpoint), improve pain relief, enhance early ambulation ability, and reduce side effects (secondary endpoints) after TKA compared with single adductor canal block. This study was carried out retrospectively in order to compare the effect of the single injection adductor nerve block, which was applied to the patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under spinal anesthesia by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic for the postoperative analgesia, and the single injection obturator block added to this on postoperative analgesia and participation in physiotherapy in relation to analgesia. The sample of this study was comprised of 60 patients who underwent knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia and peripheral nerve block for postoperative analgesia at the end of the operation by the Orthopedics and Traumatology clinic between January 2015 and January 2016. The patients were between 45-80 years old and in ASA I-II-III group. For the purpose of this study, patient records, pain follow-up forms and physiotherapy follow-up forms were retrospectively examined. The data related to patients’ demographic characteristics, postoperative VAS scores, tramadol consumption, and tramadol related side effects, satisfaction levels and compliance with postoperative physical therapy were evaluated from printed data. The data of 30 out of the 60 patients to whom receiving only adductor canal block for analgesia were referred to as Group I and the data of the remaining 30 patients to whom receiving adductor canal block and obturator nerve block together for analgesia were defined as Group II were compared. The data of 3 patients in Group II were not included in the study because of the lack of records and a total of 57 patients were examined. No significant difference was identified between the groups in terms of age, gender, height, weight, ASA distribution and tourniquet duration. The rate of diabetes mellitus (DM) in Group I was significantly higher than in Group II and the mean surgical time was significantly lower (p = 0.005, p = 0.030). Patients’ VAS scores at 12th hour were significantly higher in group I and no significant difference was found at 1st, 4th and 24th hours. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of tramadol consumption levels, nausea, vomiting, additional analgesic demand rates, satisfaction level distribution, maximum flexion to which the knee evaluated in physical therapy was able to reach and VAS score during that time, walking distance and chair test results (p = 0.506, p = 0.390, p = 0.656, p = 0.217, p = 0.240, p = 0.364, p = 0.571, p = 0.183, p = 0.386). In conclusion, combination of obturator nerve block to adductor canal block did not provide a statistically significant contribution over single adductor canal block in terms of total tramadol consumptions, postoperative analgesia and early mobilization of the patients.","PeriodicalId":90855,"journal":{"name":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Analgesia after Combined Obturator Nerve and Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"D. Şeyda, A. Yeşim, E. Veysel, Seven Seda\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2377-4630/1410088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to evaluate adding an obturator nerve block to adductor canal block may reduce tramadol consumption (primary endpoint), improve pain relief, enhance early ambulation ability, and reduce side effects (secondary endpoints) after TKA compared with single adductor canal block. This study was carried out retrospectively in order to compare the effect of the single injection adductor nerve block, which was applied to the patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under spinal anesthesia by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic for the postoperative analgesia, and the single injection obturator block added to this on postoperative analgesia and participation in physiotherapy in relation to analgesia. The sample of this study was comprised of 60 patients who underwent knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia and peripheral nerve block for postoperative analgesia at the end of the operation by the Orthopedics and Traumatology clinic between January 2015 and January 2016. The patients were between 45-80 years old and in ASA I-II-III group. For the purpose of this study, patient records, pain follow-up forms and physiotherapy follow-up forms were retrospectively examined. The data related to patients’ demographic characteristics, postoperative VAS scores, tramadol consumption, and tramadol related side effects, satisfaction levels and compliance with postoperative physical therapy were evaluated from printed data. The data of 30 out of the 60 patients to whom receiving only adductor canal block for analgesia were referred to as Group I and the data of the remaining 30 patients to whom receiving adductor canal block and obturator nerve block together for analgesia were defined as Group II were compared. The data of 3 patients in Group II were not included in the study because of the lack of records and a total of 57 patients were examined. No significant difference was identified between the groups in terms of age, gender, height, weight, ASA distribution and tourniquet duration. The rate of diabetes mellitus (DM) in Group I was significantly higher than in Group II and the mean surgical time was significantly lower (p = 0.005, p = 0.030). Patients’ VAS scores at 12th hour were significantly higher in group I and no significant difference was found at 1st, 4th and 24th hours. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of tramadol consumption levels, nausea, vomiting, additional analgesic demand rates, satisfaction level distribution, maximum flexion to which the knee evaluated in physical therapy was able to reach and VAS score during that time, walking distance and chair test results (p = 0.506, p = 0.390, p = 0.656, p = 0.217, p = 0.240, p = 0.364, p = 0.571, p = 0.183, p = 0.386). In conclusion, combination of obturator nerve block to adductor canal block did not provide a statistically significant contribution over single adductor canal block in terms of total tramadol consumptions, postoperative analgesia and early mobilization of the patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在收肌管阻滞中加入闭孔神经阻滞与单收肌管阻断相比,可以减少曲马多的消耗(主要终点),改善疼痛缓解,增强早期活动能力,并减少TKA后的副作用(次要终点)。本研究回顾性地进行,以比较麻醉学和苏醒诊所在脊柱麻醉下应用于全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者的单次注射内收神经阻滞用于术后镇痛的效果,并在此基础上加入单次注射闭孔阻滞对术后镇痛和参与物理治疗的镇痛作用。本研究的样本包括60名患者,他们在2015年1月至2016年1月期间,在脊柱麻醉和外周神经阻滞的情况下接受了膝关节置换术,以在手术结束时由骨科和创伤科诊所进行术后镇痛。患者年龄在45-80岁之间,属于ASA I-II-III组。为了本研究的目的,对患者记录、疼痛随访表和物理治疗随访表进行了回顾性检查。根据打印数据评估患者的人口统计学特征、术后VAS评分、曲马多消耗量和曲马多相关副作用、满意度和术后物理治疗依从性等相关数据。将60名仅接受内收管阻滞镇痛的患者中的30名患者的数据称为第一组,并将其余30名接受内收肌管阻滞和闭孔神经阻滞联合镇痛的患者的数据定义为第二组进行比较。由于缺乏记录,II组3名患者的数据未纳入研究,共检查了57名患者。两组在年龄、性别、身高、体重、ASA分布和止血带持续时间方面没有显著差异。I组糖尿病(DM)发生率显著高于II组,平均手术时间显著低于II组(p=0.005,p=0.030)。I组患者在第12小时的VAS评分显著高于I组,在第1、4和24小时没有显著差异。两组之间在曲马多消耗水平、恶心、呕吐、额外镇痛需求率、满意度分布、物理治疗中评估的膝盖能够达到的最大弯曲度以及在此期间的VAS评分方面没有发现显著差异,步行距离和椅子测试结果(p=0.506,p=0.390,p=0.656,p=0.217,p=0.240,p=0.364,p=0.571,p=0.183,p=0.386,术后镇痛和患者早期活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative Analgesia after Combined Obturator Nerve and Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
The purpose of this study was to evaluate adding an obturator nerve block to adductor canal block may reduce tramadol consumption (primary endpoint), improve pain relief, enhance early ambulation ability, and reduce side effects (secondary endpoints) after TKA compared with single adductor canal block. This study was carried out retrospectively in order to compare the effect of the single injection adductor nerve block, which was applied to the patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under spinal anesthesia by the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic for the postoperative analgesia, and the single injection obturator block added to this on postoperative analgesia and participation in physiotherapy in relation to analgesia. The sample of this study was comprised of 60 patients who underwent knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia and peripheral nerve block for postoperative analgesia at the end of the operation by the Orthopedics and Traumatology clinic between January 2015 and January 2016. The patients were between 45-80 years old and in ASA I-II-III group. For the purpose of this study, patient records, pain follow-up forms and physiotherapy follow-up forms were retrospectively examined. The data related to patients’ demographic characteristics, postoperative VAS scores, tramadol consumption, and tramadol related side effects, satisfaction levels and compliance with postoperative physical therapy were evaluated from printed data. The data of 30 out of the 60 patients to whom receiving only adductor canal block for analgesia were referred to as Group I and the data of the remaining 30 patients to whom receiving adductor canal block and obturator nerve block together for analgesia were defined as Group II were compared. The data of 3 patients in Group II were not included in the study because of the lack of records and a total of 57 patients were examined. No significant difference was identified between the groups in terms of age, gender, height, weight, ASA distribution and tourniquet duration. The rate of diabetes mellitus (DM) in Group I was significantly higher than in Group II and the mean surgical time was significantly lower (p = 0.005, p = 0.030). Patients’ VAS scores at 12th hour were significantly higher in group I and no significant difference was found at 1st, 4th and 24th hours. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of tramadol consumption levels, nausea, vomiting, additional analgesic demand rates, satisfaction level distribution, maximum flexion to which the knee evaluated in physical therapy was able to reach and VAS score during that time, walking distance and chair test results (p = 0.506, p = 0.390, p = 0.656, p = 0.217, p = 0.240, p = 0.364, p = 0.571, p = 0.183, p = 0.386). In conclusion, combination of obturator nerve block to adductor canal block did not provide a statistically significant contribution over single adductor canal block in terms of total tramadol consumptions, postoperative analgesia and early mobilization of the patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Trapezius Plane Block: Extended Use in Perioperative Pain Management in Nerve Transfer Surgeries A Questionnaire-Based Survey of Perioperative Utilisation of Ultrasound among Anaesthesiology Residents Pseudo Hypoxic Brain Swelling - An Unanticipated Life-Threatening Complication in Neurosurgery - Report of Two Cases with Review of Literature Anesthetic Management of the Case of Removal of Tracheobronchial Foreign Body in a Whistling Child: A Case Report The Use of the Liposomal Bupivacaine in the Quadratus Lumborum Block and Early Surgery Are Key Elements in Facilitating Ambulatory Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1