计算机科学领域SCI编委会席位与高校科研产出的关系:分位数回归方法

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science Pub Date : 2018-03-09 DOI:10.22452/MJLIS.VOL23NO1.5
Xing Wang
{"title":"计算机科学领域SCI编委会席位与高校科研产出的关系:分位数回归方法","authors":"Xing Wang","doi":"10.22452/MJLIS.VOL23NO1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses the quantile regression models to explore the relationship between SCI (Science Citation Index) editorial board representation and research output of universities in the field of computer science. Quantile regression allows the investigation of the variation of the relationship between editorial board representation and research output. A total of 447 journals and 14,442 editorial board members were analysed. The results suggest that the number of editorial board members is positively and significantly related to the quantity (number of articles) and impact (total number of citations and citations per paper) of the research output from their respective universities. A deeper analysis using quantile regression, indicates that the relationship between the number of editorial board members and the research output is stronger when the university is at the higher quartile of the conditional research output distribution. In addition, to speculate on possible mechanisms behind the relationship between editorial board representation and research output, two exploratory studies based on two small samples were conducted at the individual and journal level, respectively.","PeriodicalId":45072,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","volume":"23 1","pages":"67-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between SCI editorial board representation and university research output in the field of computer science: A quantile regression approach\",\"authors\":\"Xing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.22452/MJLIS.VOL23NO1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study uses the quantile regression models to explore the relationship between SCI (Science Citation Index) editorial board representation and research output of universities in the field of computer science. Quantile regression allows the investigation of the variation of the relationship between editorial board representation and research output. A total of 447 journals and 14,442 editorial board members were analysed. The results suggest that the number of editorial board members is positively and significantly related to the quantity (number of articles) and impact (total number of citations and citations per paper) of the research output from their respective universities. A deeper analysis using quantile regression, indicates that the relationship between the number of editorial board members and the research output is stronger when the university is at the higher quartile of the conditional research output distribution. In addition, to speculate on possible mechanisms behind the relationship between editorial board representation and research output, two exploratory studies based on two small samples were conducted at the individual and journal level, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"67-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22452/MJLIS.VOL23NO1.5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/MJLIS.VOL23NO1.5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究采用分位数回归模型探讨了SCI(Science Citation Index)编委会代表性与大学计算机科学领域研究产出之间的关系。分位数回归允许调查编委会代表性和研究产出之间关系的变化。对447种期刊和14442名编委会成员进行了分析。结果表明,编委会成员的数量与各自大学研究成果的数量(文章数量)和影响(每篇论文的引用总数和引用次数)呈正相关。使用分位数回归进行的更深层次的分析表明,当大学处于条件研究产出分布的较高四分位数时,编委会成员数量与研究产出之间的关系更强。此外,为了推测编委会代表性和研究产出之间关系背后的可能机制,分别在个人和期刊层面对两个小样本进行了两项探索性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship between SCI editorial board representation and university research output in the field of computer science: A quantile regression approach
This study uses the quantile regression models to explore the relationship between SCI (Science Citation Index) editorial board representation and research output of universities in the field of computer science. Quantile regression allows the investigation of the variation of the relationship between editorial board representation and research output. A total of 447 journals and 14,442 editorial board members were analysed. The results suggest that the number of editorial board members is positively and significantly related to the quantity (number of articles) and impact (total number of citations and citations per paper) of the research output from their respective universities. A deeper analysis using quantile regression, indicates that the relationship between the number of editorial board members and the research output is stronger when the university is at the higher quartile of the conditional research output distribution. In addition, to speculate on possible mechanisms behind the relationship between editorial board representation and research output, two exploratory studies based on two small samples were conducted at the individual and journal level, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
A study on the election factors of ACM Fellow based on the co-authorship relationship Compromising quality parameters lead to fallout: a study of de-indexing of research journals Teaching strategies for library instruction: directions from the literature Strategies for building institutional repositories a case study of content recruitment in Malaysian higher learning institutions Exploring authors engagement in journals with questionable practices: a case study of OMICS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1