胸椎旁神经阻滞与腹横平面阻滞治疗肝开放术后多肋缘镇痛的比较

Shiwei Huang, Chen Liang, B. Zou
{"title":"胸椎旁神经阻滞与腹横平面阻滞治疗肝开放术后多肋缘镇痛的比较","authors":"Shiwei Huang, Chen Liang, B. Zou","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4378.2020.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the analgesic application of thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPVB) and transverse abdom-inal plane block (TAPB) for multiple costal margins after open liver surgery. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of sixty patients [American Society Anesthesiologists (ASA) Ⅰ-Ⅲ ]who were scheduled for open liver surgery (with a classical reverse L-shaped incision) were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups according to the random number table method (n=30): a TPAB group (group TP) and a group of TAPB for multiple costal margins (group TA). Both groups received ultrasound guided nerve block before surgery. Group TP under-went bilateral TPVB at T7-T8 and T8-T9, while group TA underwent TAPB under bilateral costal margins and the classical site between the costal margin and the anterior inferior iliac spine, with a total of four block points. Then, both groups were compared and recorded for the duration of block procedures; the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate before incision (T0), after incision (T1), and at the times of block of the superior vena cava (T2), liver removal (T3) and stitching (T4); surgical duration, the inflow of liquid during surgery, the consumption of remifentanil, and the length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay after surgery; the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at resting and during movement immediately after surgery (when patients were awaken after extubation and able to communicate normally), and 2 h and 6 h after surgery; and the number of patients requiring opioids within 6 h after surgery and the time when opioids were first given after surgery. \n \n \nResults \nGroup TA presented shorter duration of block procedures than group TP (P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nDuring open liver surgery, compared with TAPB for multiple costal margins, TPVB can maintain more stable hemody-namics, require less doses of opioids and improve perioperative analgesia. \n \n \nKey words: \nOpen liver surgery; Thoracic paravertebral nerve block; Transverse abdominal plane block; Postoperative analgesia","PeriodicalId":13847,"journal":{"name":"国际麻醉学与复苏杂志","volume":"41 1","pages":"260-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of thoracic paravertebral nerve block and transverse abdominal plane block for multiple costal margins in anal-gesia after open liver surgery\",\"authors\":\"Shiwei Huang, Chen Liang, B. Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4378.2020.03.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the analgesic application of thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPVB) and transverse abdom-inal plane block (TAPB) for multiple costal margins after open liver surgery. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA total of sixty patients [American Society Anesthesiologists (ASA) Ⅰ-Ⅲ ]who were scheduled for open liver surgery (with a classical reverse L-shaped incision) were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups according to the random number table method (n=30): a TPAB group (group TP) and a group of TAPB for multiple costal margins (group TA). Both groups received ultrasound guided nerve block before surgery. Group TP under-went bilateral TPVB at T7-T8 and T8-T9, while group TA underwent TAPB under bilateral costal margins and the classical site between the costal margin and the anterior inferior iliac spine, with a total of four block points. Then, both groups were compared and recorded for the duration of block procedures; the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate before incision (T0), after incision (T1), and at the times of block of the superior vena cava (T2), liver removal (T3) and stitching (T4); surgical duration, the inflow of liquid during surgery, the consumption of remifentanil, and the length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay after surgery; the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at resting and during movement immediately after surgery (when patients were awaken after extubation and able to communicate normally), and 2 h and 6 h after surgery; and the number of patients requiring opioids within 6 h after surgery and the time when opioids were first given after surgery. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nGroup TA presented shorter duration of block procedures than group TP (P 0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nDuring open liver surgery, compared with TAPB for multiple costal margins, TPVB can maintain more stable hemody-namics, require less doses of opioids and improve perioperative analgesia. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nOpen liver surgery; Thoracic paravertebral nerve block; Transverse abdominal plane block; Postoperative analgesia\",\"PeriodicalId\":13847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"国际麻醉学与复苏杂志\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"260-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"国际麻醉学与复苏杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4378.2020.03.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"国际麻醉学与复苏杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4378.2020.03.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)和腹横平面阻滞(TAPB)在肝脏开放术后多肋缘的镇痛作用。方法选择60例[美国麻醉师协会(ASA)Ⅰ-Ⅲ]肝开放手术(采用经典的倒L形切口)患者。根据随机数表法将患者分为两组(n=30):TPAB组(TP组)和多肋缘TAPB组(TA组)。两组患者术前均接受超声引导下的神经阻滞。TP组在T7-T8和T8-T9进行双侧TPVB,TA组在双侧肋缘和肋缘与髂前下棘之间的经典部位进行TAPB,共4个阻滞点。然后,对两组进行比较,并记录阻滞程序的持续时间;切口前(T0)、切口后(T1)以及阻断上腔静脉(T2)、取肝(T3)和缝合(T4)时的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率;手术持续时间、手术期间液体的流入、瑞芬太尼的消耗以及术后麻醉后护理单元(PACU)的停留时间;术后休息和运动时(拔管后患者苏醒并能够正常交流时)以及术后2小时和6小时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分;以及术后6小时内需要阿片类药物的患者人数和术后首次给药的时间。结果TA组阻滞时间短于TP组(P<0.05)。结论在肝脏开放手术中,与TAPB相比,TPVB可维持更稳定的血液动力学,减少阿片类药物的用量,提高围手术期镇痛效果。关键词:肝脏开放手术;胸椎旁神经阻滞;横腹平面阻滞;术后镇痛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of thoracic paravertebral nerve block and transverse abdominal plane block for multiple costal margins in anal-gesia after open liver surgery
Objective To evaluate the analgesic application of thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPVB) and transverse abdom-inal plane block (TAPB) for multiple costal margins after open liver surgery. Methods A total of sixty patients [American Society Anesthesiologists (ASA) Ⅰ-Ⅲ ]who were scheduled for open liver surgery (with a classical reverse L-shaped incision) were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups according to the random number table method (n=30): a TPAB group (group TP) and a group of TAPB for multiple costal margins (group TA). Both groups received ultrasound guided nerve block before surgery. Group TP under-went bilateral TPVB at T7-T8 and T8-T9, while group TA underwent TAPB under bilateral costal margins and the classical site between the costal margin and the anterior inferior iliac spine, with a total of four block points. Then, both groups were compared and recorded for the duration of block procedures; the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate before incision (T0), after incision (T1), and at the times of block of the superior vena cava (T2), liver removal (T3) and stitching (T4); surgical duration, the inflow of liquid during surgery, the consumption of remifentanil, and the length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay after surgery; the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at resting and during movement immediately after surgery (when patients were awaken after extubation and able to communicate normally), and 2 h and 6 h after surgery; and the number of patients requiring opioids within 6 h after surgery and the time when opioids were first given after surgery. Results Group TA presented shorter duration of block procedures than group TP (P 0.05). Conclusions During open liver surgery, compared with TAPB for multiple costal margins, TPVB can maintain more stable hemody-namics, require less doses of opioids and improve perioperative analgesia. Key words: Open liver surgery; Thoracic paravertebral nerve block; Transverse abdominal plane block; Postoperative analgesia
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7758
期刊最新文献
Research progress on cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in acute respiratory distress syndrome Accuracy of invasive systolic pressure variation in monitoring the volume responsiveness of patients under pneumoperitoneum Research progress on blood-brain barrier damage in the pathogenesis of postoperative delirium Comparison of the application of cuffed or uncuffed endotracheal tubes in full-term newborns undergoing congenital intestinal atresia surgery Research progress on the clinical application of apneic oxygenation technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1