三种体质指数分类预测印尼中年人高血压的比较

Tri Sutanti Puji Hartati, Emyr Reisha Isaura
{"title":"三种体质指数分类预测印尼中年人高血压的比较","authors":"Tri Sutanti Puji Hartati, Emyr Reisha Isaura","doi":"10.20473/mgi.v18i1.38-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiovascular disease is one of the severe causes of death in low-middle-income countries. Being overweight and obese relates to a higher risk of hypertension, which further increases the risk of CVD. Therefore, determining body mass index (BMI) cut-off points is essential to provide a new scale for early and accurate screening. This study aimed to compare three classifications of BMI defined by WHO, Indonesia, and Asian criteria in predicting hypertension in middle-aged Indonesians. We used the 2014 Indonesian Family Life Survey data and included a total sample of 9737 respondents aged 40-60-year-old. We compared values (specificity, sensitivity, negative and positive predictive value, false-positive rate, negative and positive likelihood ratio, Youden index, and prevalence) of three BMI criteria (WHO, Indonesian, and Asian) between groups (Group 1: normal BMI vs overweight + obese BMI; group 2: normal + overweight BMI vs obese BMI) to determine the cut-off points of BMI related to hypertension. The hypertension prevalence was significantly higher in women (48.3%) than in men (42.0%). Respondents’ BMI was positively associated with hypertension.  The Asian BMI classification showed better sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, FPR, LR+, LR-, and Youden index in group 1 than in group 2. Thus, this study proposed a fitted BMI cut-off point for overweight was ≥23 kg/m2 and for obesity was ≥25 kg/m2 as the early screening of overweight and obesity related to hypertension among the middle-aged population in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":32965,"journal":{"name":"Media Gizi Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Body Mass Index Classification Comparison In Predicting Hypertension Among Middle-Aged Indonesians\",\"authors\":\"Tri Sutanti Puji Hartati, Emyr Reisha Isaura\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/mgi.v18i1.38-48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cardiovascular disease is one of the severe causes of death in low-middle-income countries. Being overweight and obese relates to a higher risk of hypertension, which further increases the risk of CVD. Therefore, determining body mass index (BMI) cut-off points is essential to provide a new scale for early and accurate screening. This study aimed to compare three classifications of BMI defined by WHO, Indonesia, and Asian criteria in predicting hypertension in middle-aged Indonesians. We used the 2014 Indonesian Family Life Survey data and included a total sample of 9737 respondents aged 40-60-year-old. We compared values (specificity, sensitivity, negative and positive predictive value, false-positive rate, negative and positive likelihood ratio, Youden index, and prevalence) of three BMI criteria (WHO, Indonesian, and Asian) between groups (Group 1: normal BMI vs overweight + obese BMI; group 2: normal + overweight BMI vs obese BMI) to determine the cut-off points of BMI related to hypertension. The hypertension prevalence was significantly higher in women (48.3%) than in men (42.0%). Respondents’ BMI was positively associated with hypertension.  The Asian BMI classification showed better sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, FPR, LR+, LR-, and Youden index in group 1 than in group 2. Thus, this study proposed a fitted BMI cut-off point for overweight was ≥23 kg/m2 and for obesity was ≥25 kg/m2 as the early screening of overweight and obesity related to hypertension among the middle-aged population in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media Gizi Indonesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media Gizi Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/mgi.v18i1.38-48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Gizi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/mgi.v18i1.38-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心血管疾病是中低收入国家的严重死亡原因之一。超重和肥胖与高血压的风险较高有关,这进一步增加了患心血管疾病的风险。因此,确定身体质量指数(BMI)分界点,为早期准确筛查提供新的尺度是十分必要的。本研究旨在比较世界卫生组织、印度尼西亚和亚洲标准定义的三种BMI分类,以预测印度尼西亚中年人的高血压。我们使用了2014年印度尼西亚家庭生活调查数据,共纳入了9737名年龄在40-60岁之间的受访者。我们比较了三种BMI标准(WHO、印度尼西亚和亚洲)在组间的值(特异性、敏感性、阴性和阳性预测值、假阳性率、阴性和阳性似然比、约登指数和患病率)(第一组:正常BMI vs超重+肥胖BMI;2组:正常+超重BMI vs肥胖BMI),以确定与高血压相关的BMI的分界点。女性高血压患病率(48.3%)明显高于男性(42.0%)。被调查者的BMI与高血压呈正相关。亚洲BMI分类1组的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV、FPR、LR+、LR-、Youden指数优于2组。因此,本研究提出体重超重≥23 kg/m2和肥胖≥25 kg/m2的BMI分界点作为印尼中年人群高血压相关超重和肥胖的早期筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Three Body Mass Index Classification Comparison In Predicting Hypertension Among Middle-Aged Indonesians
Cardiovascular disease is one of the severe causes of death in low-middle-income countries. Being overweight and obese relates to a higher risk of hypertension, which further increases the risk of CVD. Therefore, determining body mass index (BMI) cut-off points is essential to provide a new scale for early and accurate screening. This study aimed to compare three classifications of BMI defined by WHO, Indonesia, and Asian criteria in predicting hypertension in middle-aged Indonesians. We used the 2014 Indonesian Family Life Survey data and included a total sample of 9737 respondents aged 40-60-year-old. We compared values (specificity, sensitivity, negative and positive predictive value, false-positive rate, negative and positive likelihood ratio, Youden index, and prevalence) of three BMI criteria (WHO, Indonesian, and Asian) between groups (Group 1: normal BMI vs overweight + obese BMI; group 2: normal + overweight BMI vs obese BMI) to determine the cut-off points of BMI related to hypertension. The hypertension prevalence was significantly higher in women (48.3%) than in men (42.0%). Respondents’ BMI was positively associated with hypertension.  The Asian BMI classification showed better sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, FPR, LR+, LR-, and Youden index in group 1 than in group 2. Thus, this study proposed a fitted BMI cut-off point for overweight was ≥23 kg/m2 and for obesity was ≥25 kg/m2 as the early screening of overweight and obesity related to hypertension among the middle-aged population in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Forecasting Layer Egg Production as Animal Source Food for Protein to Reduce Stunting in West Java, Indonesia Potential of Sunflower Seed Biscuits in Lowering Blood Glucose and Malondialdehyde Level in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Rat Models Eating Behavior of Indonesian Adults Differs by Metropolization Levels based on the 2018 Indonesian Food Barometer Narrative Review of Known Plants which Have Potential Benefits as Natural Galactagogues in Indonesia Nutrition Status And Neuropsychiatric Disorders In Indonesian Childhood Lupus: Experience At A Single Tertiary Referral Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1