{"title":"残疾人的自我表现","authors":"A. Kohn","doi":"10.1075/LD.00084.KOH","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper examines the contribution of multimodal strategies in challenging aspects of public discourse about\n people with disabilities. It looks into media texts that were created by people with disabilities, in which the topic of\n disability is not a metaphor or a narrative prosthesis, but a demand for recognition and a call for a sincere dialogue, using\n three complementary strategies: disabling the viewers, challenging dominant aesthetic norms, and ironic echoing. The paper focuses\n on two autobiographical videos, a promotional video, a small corpus of paintings and a photograph, in which ironic echoing is the\n dominant strategy.","PeriodicalId":42318,"journal":{"name":"Language and Dialogue","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-representation of people with disabilities\",\"authors\":\"A. Kohn\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LD.00084.KOH\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper examines the contribution of multimodal strategies in challenging aspects of public discourse about\\n people with disabilities. It looks into media texts that were created by people with disabilities, in which the topic of\\n disability is not a metaphor or a narrative prosthesis, but a demand for recognition and a call for a sincere dialogue, using\\n three complementary strategies: disabling the viewers, challenging dominant aesthetic norms, and ironic echoing. The paper focuses\\n on two autobiographical videos, a promotional video, a small corpus of paintings and a photograph, in which ironic echoing is the\\n dominant strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LD.00084.KOH\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LD.00084.KOH","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper examines the contribution of multimodal strategies in challenging aspects of public discourse about
people with disabilities. It looks into media texts that were created by people with disabilities, in which the topic of
disability is not a metaphor or a narrative prosthesis, but a demand for recognition and a call for a sincere dialogue, using
three complementary strategies: disabling the viewers, challenging dominant aesthetic norms, and ironic echoing. The paper focuses
on two autobiographical videos, a promotional video, a small corpus of paintings and a photograph, in which ironic echoing is the
dominant strategy.
期刊介绍：
In our post-Cartesian times human abilities are regarded as integrated and interacting abilities. Speaking, thinking, perceiving, having emotions need to be studied in interaction. Integration and interaction take place in dialogue. Scholars are called upon to go beyond reductive methods of abstraction and division and to take up the challenge of coming to terms with the complex whole. The conclusions drawn from reasoning about human behaviour in the humanities and social sciences have finally been proven by experiments in the natural sciences, especially neurology and sociobiology. What happens in the black box, can now, at least in part, be made visible. The journal intends to be an explicitly interdisciplinary journal reaching out to any discipline dealing with human abilities on the basis of consilience or the unity of knowledge. It is the challenge of post-Cartesian science to tackle the issue of how body, mind and language are interconnected and dialogically put to action. The journal invites papers which deal with ‘language and dialogue’ as an integrated whole in different languages and cultures and in different areas: everyday, institutional and literary, in theory and in practice, in business, in court, in the media, in politics and academia. In particular the humanities and social sciences are addressed: linguistics, literary studies, pragmatics, dialogue analysis, communication and cultural studies, applied linguistics, business studies, media studies, studies of language and the law, philosophy, psychology, cognitive sciences, sociology, anthropology and others. The journal Language and Dialogue is a peer reviewed journal and associated with the book series Dialogue Studies, edited by Edda Weigand.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
