教师变革性专业学习经验缩小与包容性实践相关的价值观实践差距

IF 1.8 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Cambridge Journal of Education Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/0305764X.2021.1965092
A. Brennan, F. King
{"title":"教师变革性专业学习经验缩小与包容性实践相关的价值观实践差距","authors":"A. Brennan, F. King","doi":"10.1080/0305764X.2021.1965092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The literature supports transformative models of professional learning and development (PLD) such as professional learning communities (PLCs). However, there is a research gap relating to PLCs for inclusive practice. This paper draws on findings from a qualitative study with 10 teachers in an urban primary school in the Republic of Ireland, who engaged in a PLC for inclusive practice facilitated by one of the researchers. Two years later the researchers undertook semi-structured interviews with nine of the original participants and five classroom observations to explore if and how teachers can sustain inclusive practices in changing times. The findings evidenced sustained changes in teachers’ individual and collaborative practices, affirming an argument that PLCs can support teachers to develop and sustain inclusive practices in the longer term. This paper offers a conceptual framework for prospectively planning PLCs to narrow the values practice gap for inclusive practice.","PeriodicalId":47730,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"175 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ experiences of transformative professional learning to narrow the values practice gap related to inclusive practice\",\"authors\":\"A. Brennan, F. King\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0305764X.2021.1965092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The literature supports transformative models of professional learning and development (PLD) such as professional learning communities (PLCs). However, there is a research gap relating to PLCs for inclusive practice. This paper draws on findings from a qualitative study with 10 teachers in an urban primary school in the Republic of Ireland, who engaged in a PLC for inclusive practice facilitated by one of the researchers. Two years later the researchers undertook semi-structured interviews with nine of the original participants and five classroom observations to explore if and how teachers can sustain inclusive practices in changing times. The findings evidenced sustained changes in teachers’ individual and collaborative practices, affirming an argument that PLCs can support teachers to develop and sustain inclusive practices in the longer term. This paper offers a conceptual framework for prospectively planning PLCs to narrow the values practice gap for inclusive practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cambridge Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"175 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cambridge Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1965092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1965092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

文献支持专业学习与发展(PLD)的变革模型,如专业学习社区(plc)。然而,关于plc包容性实践的研究还存在空白。本文借鉴了对爱尔兰共和国一所城市小学的10名教师进行定性研究的结果,这些教师参与了一项由一名研究人员促成的包容性实践的PLC。两年后,研究人员对九名原始参与者进行了半结构化访谈,并进行了五次课堂观察,以探索教师是否以及如何在不断变化的时代保持包容性实践。研究结果证明了教师个人和合作实践的持续变化,证实了plc可以支持教师长期发展和维持包容性实践的观点。本文为前瞻性规划plc提供了一个概念框架,以缩小包容性实践的价值实践差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teachers’ experiences of transformative professional learning to narrow the values practice gap related to inclusive practice
ABSTRACT The literature supports transformative models of professional learning and development (PLD) such as professional learning communities (PLCs). However, there is a research gap relating to PLCs for inclusive practice. This paper draws on findings from a qualitative study with 10 teachers in an urban primary school in the Republic of Ireland, who engaged in a PLC for inclusive practice facilitated by one of the researchers. Two years later the researchers undertook semi-structured interviews with nine of the original participants and five classroom observations to explore if and how teachers can sustain inclusive practices in changing times. The findings evidenced sustained changes in teachers’ individual and collaborative practices, affirming an argument that PLCs can support teachers to develop and sustain inclusive practices in the longer term. This paper offers a conceptual framework for prospectively planning PLCs to narrow the values practice gap for inclusive practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cambridge Journal of Education
Cambridge Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Cambridge Journal of Education publishes original refereed articles on all aspects of education, with a particular emphasis on work that contributes to a shared understanding amongst academic researchers, theorists, practising teachers, policy-makers and educational administrators. The journal also welcomes the submission of systematic review articles that summarise and offer new insights into specific areas of educational concern. With a wide international readership, Cambridge Journal of Education publishes contributions drawn from different educational systems and cultures enabling continued in-depth discussion of global educational theory, policy and practice. The journal’s Special Issue programme encourages and stimulates focused discussion and engagement with significant themes and responses to topics raised by readers and contributors. Cambridge Journal of Education welcomes proposals for future editions.
期刊最新文献
Academisation, neoliberal technologies of governance and the rapid growth of multi-academy trusts (MATs) in England “Sometimes it feels like we are puppets, here to listen to but not speak”: listening to the voices of young Bangladeshi students about barriers to well-being at school Funds of courage: advancing social justice in children’s reading for pleasure Indigenous youth wellbeing in higher education: a systematic literature review of qualitative studies Adolescents’ and teachers’ experience of shared education: a small-scale qualitative study in Northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1