有氧运动训练对提高心脏移植后的有氧能力有多有效?系统回顾和荟萃分析

Keriann Groen, P. Robison, Annie Xiong, Kent E. Irwin, Amy B Stein, C. C. Evans
{"title":"有氧运动训练对提高心脏移植后的有氧能力有多有效?系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Keriann Groen, P. Robison, Annie Xiong, Kent E. Irwin, Amy B Stein, C. C. Evans","doi":"10.1097/CPT.0000000000000159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Purpose: Studies suggest that additional exercise (Ex) training beyond “usual care” increases peak VO2 in people post-heart transplant (HTx); however, no recent studies have quantified improvements or compared moderate-intensity aerobic Ex (MOD) to high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The purpose of this study was to quantify improvements in VO2 for patients post-HTx undergoing additional Ex training and compare effectiveness of MOD to HIIT. Methods: Inclusion criteria were: randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses published between 2008 to 2018, subjects post-HTx, participated in an aerobic Ex program beyond usual care, and reported peak VO2. Results: A total of 242 records were obtained and 7 randomized clinical trials were reviewed. The average PEDro score was 4.86 (range 2–7). The within-group weighted mean difference (WMD) in peak VO2 comparing baseline to post-training for the Ex group = 3.3 (0.5) ml/kg/min and for the control group = −0.2 (0.2) ml/kg/min. The between-group WMD in peak VO2 = 3.5 (7.9) ml/kg/min, Hedge's g = 0.606 (95% confidence intervals = 0.337–0.874), P < .001, favoring Ex. Comparison between Ex protocols indicated that there was no difference between HIIT and MOD (Q = 1.83, P = .176). Conclusions: Physical therapists should challenge patients post-HTx with aerobic Ex that goes beyond usual post-HTx care and should consider incorporating HIIT into the treatment plan or home program to maximize the benefits of rehabilitation when possible.","PeriodicalId":72526,"journal":{"name":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"114 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Effective Is Aerobic Exercise Training in Improving Aerobic Capacity After Heart Transplant? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Keriann Groen, P. Robison, Annie Xiong, Kent E. Irwin, Amy B Stein, C. C. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CPT.0000000000000159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Purpose: Studies suggest that additional exercise (Ex) training beyond “usual care” increases peak VO2 in people post-heart transplant (HTx); however, no recent studies have quantified improvements or compared moderate-intensity aerobic Ex (MOD) to high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The purpose of this study was to quantify improvements in VO2 for patients post-HTx undergoing additional Ex training and compare effectiveness of MOD to HIIT. Methods: Inclusion criteria were: randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses published between 2008 to 2018, subjects post-HTx, participated in an aerobic Ex program beyond usual care, and reported peak VO2. Results: A total of 242 records were obtained and 7 randomized clinical trials were reviewed. The average PEDro score was 4.86 (range 2–7). The within-group weighted mean difference (WMD) in peak VO2 comparing baseline to post-training for the Ex group = 3.3 (0.5) ml/kg/min and for the control group = −0.2 (0.2) ml/kg/min. The between-group WMD in peak VO2 = 3.5 (7.9) ml/kg/min, Hedge's g = 0.606 (95% confidence intervals = 0.337–0.874), P < .001, favoring Ex. Comparison between Ex protocols indicated that there was no difference between HIIT and MOD (Q = 1.83, P = .176). Conclusions: Physical therapists should challenge patients post-HTx with aerobic Ex that goes beyond usual post-HTx care and should consider incorporating HIIT into the treatment plan or home program to maximize the benefits of rehabilitation when possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"114 - 128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CPT.0000000000000159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CPT.0000000000000159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

补充数字内容可在文本中获得。目的:研究表明,在“常规护理”之外的额外运动(Ex)训练可以增加心脏移植后患者的峰值VO2;然而,最近没有研究量化改善或比较中等强度有氧Ex (MOD)与高强度间歇训练(HIIT)。本研究的目的是量化htx后接受额外Ex训练的患者VO2的改善,并比较MOD与HIIT的有效性。方法:纳入标准为:2008年至2018年间发表的随机临床试验、系统评价或荟萃分析、htx后受试者、参加常规护理以外的有氧Ex计划,并报告VO2峰值。结果:共获得242份记录,回顾了7项随机临床试验。平均PEDro评分为4.86(范围2-7)。实验组与训练后相比,组内VO2峰值加权平均差(WMD) = 3.3 (0.5) ml/kg/min,对照组= - 0.2 (0.2)ml/kg/min。峰VO2组间WMD = 3.5 (7.9) ml/kg/min, Hedge’s g = 0.606(95%可信区间= 0.337 ~ 0.874),P < 0.001,支持Ex。Ex方案间比较表明HIIT与MOD之间无差异(Q = 1.83, P = 0.176)。结论:物理治疗师应该对htx后患者进行有氧Ex训练,以超越通常的htx后护理,并应考虑将HIIT纳入治疗计划或家庭计划,以尽可能最大化康复效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Effective Is Aerobic Exercise Training in Improving Aerobic Capacity After Heart Transplant? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Purpose: Studies suggest that additional exercise (Ex) training beyond “usual care” increases peak VO2 in people post-heart transplant (HTx); however, no recent studies have quantified improvements or compared moderate-intensity aerobic Ex (MOD) to high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The purpose of this study was to quantify improvements in VO2 for patients post-HTx undergoing additional Ex training and compare effectiveness of MOD to HIIT. Methods: Inclusion criteria were: randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses published between 2008 to 2018, subjects post-HTx, participated in an aerobic Ex program beyond usual care, and reported peak VO2. Results: A total of 242 records were obtained and 7 randomized clinical trials were reviewed. The average PEDro score was 4.86 (range 2–7). The within-group weighted mean difference (WMD) in peak VO2 comparing baseline to post-training for the Ex group = 3.3 (0.5) ml/kg/min and for the control group = −0.2 (0.2) ml/kg/min. The between-group WMD in peak VO2 = 3.5 (7.9) ml/kg/min, Hedge's g = 0.606 (95% confidence intervals = 0.337–0.874), P < .001, favoring Ex. Comparison between Ex protocols indicated that there was no difference between HIIT and MOD (Q = 1.83, P = .176). Conclusions: Physical therapists should challenge patients post-HTx with aerobic Ex that goes beyond usual post-HTx care and should consider incorporating HIIT into the treatment plan or home program to maximize the benefits of rehabilitation when possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associations between Physical Activity, Systemic Inflammation, and Hospital Admissions in Adults with Heart Failure. From the Swimming Pool to Precision Cardiovascular Physical Therapy: What a Journey! Commentary on “Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Outpatients With Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Survey of Orthopedic and Sports Academies” Professional Community Simulation-Based Cardiopulmonary Examination Skills Checklist: Assessment of Inter-rater Reliability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1