ESG基金在自定义供款计划新参与者中的分配

SSRN Pub Date : 2023-07-12 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4149885
David Blanchett, Zhikun Liu
{"title":"ESG基金在自定义供款计划新参与者中的分配","authors":"David Blanchett, Zhikun Liu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4149885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investment strategies focused on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues have been receiving increased interest among defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors, consultants, and regulators. This article explores the allocation decisions of 9,324 newly enrolled DC participants who are self-directing their accounts in a DC plan that offers at least one ESG fund. The analysis suggests that demand for ESG funds is relatively low, with ESG fund allocations and holding levels being lower than random chance would suggest. While there are some clear demographic preferences for ESG funds (e.g., among younger participants with higher incomes), ESG allocations appear to be primarily a function of weak preferences, driven by naïve diversification, although ESG allocations are significantly higher in plans where general ESG usage is more elevated. ESG funds have the potential to drive participants away from professionally managed investment options, such as target-date funds, resulting in lower risk-adjusted returns for participants if they are simply added to core menus. Overall, this analysis suggests that plan sponsors should take a thoughtful and cautious approach when considering adding ESG funds to an existing core menu.","PeriodicalId":74863,"journal":{"name":"SSRN","volume":"11 1","pages":"56 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESG Fund Allocations among New, Do-It-Yourself Defined Contribution Plan Participants\",\"authors\":\"David Blanchett, Zhikun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.4149885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Investment strategies focused on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues have been receiving increased interest among defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors, consultants, and regulators. This article explores the allocation decisions of 9,324 newly enrolled DC participants who are self-directing their accounts in a DC plan that offers at least one ESG fund. The analysis suggests that demand for ESG funds is relatively low, with ESG fund allocations and holding levels being lower than random chance would suggest. While there are some clear demographic preferences for ESG funds (e.g., among younger participants with higher incomes), ESG allocations appear to be primarily a function of weak preferences, driven by naïve diversification, although ESG allocations are significantly higher in plans where general ESG usage is more elevated. ESG funds have the potential to drive participants away from professionally managed investment options, such as target-date funds, resulting in lower risk-adjusted returns for participants if they are simply added to core menus. Overall, this analysis suggests that plan sponsors should take a thoughtful and cautious approach when considering adding ESG funds to an existing core menu.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSRN\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"56 - 73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSRN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4149885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4149885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

专注于环境、社会和治理(ESG)问题的投资策略越来越受到固定缴款(DC)计划发起人、顾问和监管机构的关注。本文探讨了9324名新注册的DC参与者的分配决策,他们在至少提供一个ESG基金的DC计划中自我指导自己的账户。分析表明,对ESG基金的需求相对较低,ESG基金的配置和持有水平低于随机机会所显示的水平。虽然ESG基金有一些明显的人口偏好(例如,在收入较高的年轻参与者中),但ESG分配似乎主要是由天真的多元化驱动的弱偏好的函数,尽管在总体ESG使用率更高的计划中,ESG分配要高得多。ESG基金有可能使参与者远离专业管理的投资选择,如目标日期基金,如果只是将其添加到核心菜单中,则会降低参与者的风险调整回报。总体而言,这一分析表明,计划赞助商在考虑将ESG基金添加到现有核心菜单中时,应采取深思熟虑和谨慎的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESG Fund Allocations among New, Do-It-Yourself Defined Contribution Plan Participants
Investment strategies focused on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues have been receiving increased interest among defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors, consultants, and regulators. This article explores the allocation decisions of 9,324 newly enrolled DC participants who are self-directing their accounts in a DC plan that offers at least one ESG fund. The analysis suggests that demand for ESG funds is relatively low, with ESG fund allocations and holding levels being lower than random chance would suggest. While there are some clear demographic preferences for ESG funds (e.g., among younger participants with higher incomes), ESG allocations appear to be primarily a function of weak preferences, driven by naïve diversification, although ESG allocations are significantly higher in plans where general ESG usage is more elevated. ESG funds have the potential to drive participants away from professionally managed investment options, such as target-date funds, resulting in lower risk-adjusted returns for participants if they are simply added to core menus. Overall, this analysis suggests that plan sponsors should take a thoughtful and cautious approach when considering adding ESG funds to an existing core menu.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stocks as a Hedge against Inflation: Does Corporate Profitability Keep Up with Inflation? How Useful Is a Prospectus in Identifying Greenwashing versus True ESG Funds? Beyond Direct Indexing: Dynamic Direct Long-Short Investing The Hidden Cost in Costless Put-Spread Collars: Rebalance Timing Luck Investing in Carbon Credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1