穆罕默德·马朗大学英语教育系学生的性别差异学习策略

T. Andini, Santi Prastiyowati
{"title":"穆罕默德·马朗大学英语教育系学生的性别差异学习策略","authors":"T. Andini, Santi Prastiyowati","doi":"10.22219/jinop.v7i2.10476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender difference can be assumed as an individual difference generally existing and catching attention in the foreign language teaching and learning.This research aims at finding out the strategies used by the students in learning English and students’ perspective on the learning strategies based on their gender. The data are gathered through questionnaires and interview which are given to the students of English Language Education Department. This study discovered that male and female students differ in the learning strategy, and the female students score higher in the use of learning strategy than the males. Metacognitive and social learning strategy were highly used by female students. On the other hand, male students score compensation, metacognitive and cognitive learning strategy as their attempts to learn English. The result also found that females use all the strategies more often than males particularly on metacognitive strategy. Moreover, there are differences in the use of other strategies, but the finding is not remarkable.","PeriodicalId":32038,"journal":{"name":"JINOP Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences learning strategy at English Language Education Department Students University Of Muhammadiyah Malang\",\"authors\":\"T. Andini, Santi Prastiyowati\",\"doi\":\"10.22219/jinop.v7i2.10476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gender difference can be assumed as an individual difference generally existing and catching attention in the foreign language teaching and learning.This research aims at finding out the strategies used by the students in learning English and students’ perspective on the learning strategies based on their gender. The data are gathered through questionnaires and interview which are given to the students of English Language Education Department. This study discovered that male and female students differ in the learning strategy, and the female students score higher in the use of learning strategy than the males. Metacognitive and social learning strategy were highly used by female students. On the other hand, male students score compensation, metacognitive and cognitive learning strategy as their attempts to learn English. The result also found that females use all the strategies more often than males particularly on metacognitive strategy. Moreover, there are differences in the use of other strategies, but the finding is not remarkable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JINOP Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JINOP Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v7i2.10476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JINOP Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v7i2.10476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

性别差异可以认为是外语教学中普遍存在并受到关注的个体差异。本研究旨在了解学生在英语学习中使用的策略,以及基于性别的学生对学习策略的看法。通过问卷调查和访谈的方式对英语语言教育系的学生进行数据收集。本研究发现,男女学生在学习策略上存在差异,女生在学习策略的使用上得分高于男生。女生的元认知策略和社会学习策略使用率较高。另一方面,男学生在英语学习过程中对补偿、元认知和认知学习策略进行了评分。结果还发现,女性比男性更频繁地使用所有策略,特别是在元认知策略上。此外,在其他策略的使用上也存在差异,但这一发现并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender differences learning strategy at English Language Education Department Students University Of Muhammadiyah Malang
Gender difference can be assumed as an individual difference generally existing and catching attention in the foreign language teaching and learning.This research aims at finding out the strategies used by the students in learning English and students’ perspective on the learning strategies based on their gender. The data are gathered through questionnaires and interview which are given to the students of English Language Education Department. This study discovered that male and female students differ in the learning strategy, and the female students score higher in the use of learning strategy than the males. Metacognitive and social learning strategy were highly used by female students. On the other hand, male students score compensation, metacognitive and cognitive learning strategy as their attempts to learn English. The result also found that females use all the strategies more often than males particularly on metacognitive strategy. Moreover, there are differences in the use of other strategies, but the finding is not remarkable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Students’ Cognitive Engagement and Academic Performance in A Flipped Classroom Model in Outstanding Class Program Pengembangan e-modul berbasis pbl untuk meningkatkan kemampuan analisis dan rasa ingin tahu siswa Digitalisasi ajaran Ki-Hadjar-Dewantara pada proses pembelajaran neo-guided inquiry untuk mengembangkan literasi dan numerasi mahasiswa Implementasi Model PjBL-STEAM konteks lahan basah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy peserta didik Implementation and challenges of project-based learning of STEAM in the university during the pandemic: A systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1