罗尔斯和努斯鲍姆自由主义视角下的正义

Pedro Luís Bracho Fuenmayor
{"title":"罗尔斯和努斯鲍姆自由主义视角下的正义","authors":"Pedro Luís Bracho Fuenmayor","doi":"10.46398/cuestpol.4176.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, the objective was to analyze justice from the liberal perspective of John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum, with a comparative approach. A documentary review of the bibliographic material about the productions of Rawls (1975, 1971, 1986, 1996, 1097), and Nussbaum (1992, 2007, 2012, 2014, 2016) was carried out, also considering the approach of experts in the subject. It is a qualitative research of descriptive type, with methodological design of theoretical, documentary and diachronic cut. The data collection technique was the signing or registration of author, documentary and content references. As a result, an analytical comparison was established referring to some criteria on the notion of justice, and it is concluded by analyzing the postulates of these two philosophers, that the theoretical supports of Rawls, are far from the real society, by assuming that all primary social goods; freedom, equal opportunities, income, wealth and the bases of mutual respect, must be distributed in an equal way, while for Nussbaum justice must produce in its citizens the ability to deliberate, think, discuss, choose and tries to overcome the concept of justice proper to contractualism ensuring respect for the value and dignity of each individual.","PeriodicalId":40854,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Politicas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La justicia desde la perspectiva liberal de Rawls y Nussbaum\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Luís Bracho Fuenmayor\",\"doi\":\"10.46398/cuestpol.4176.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this research, the objective was to analyze justice from the liberal perspective of John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum, with a comparative approach. A documentary review of the bibliographic material about the productions of Rawls (1975, 1971, 1986, 1996, 1097), and Nussbaum (1992, 2007, 2012, 2014, 2016) was carried out, also considering the approach of experts in the subject. It is a qualitative research of descriptive type, with methodological design of theoretical, documentary and diachronic cut. The data collection technique was the signing or registration of author, documentary and content references. As a result, an analytical comparison was established referring to some criteria on the notion of justice, and it is concluded by analyzing the postulates of these two philosophers, that the theoretical supports of Rawls, are far from the real society, by assuming that all primary social goods; freedom, equal opportunities, income, wealth and the bases of mutual respect, must be distributed in an equal way, while for Nussbaum justice must produce in its citizens the ability to deliberate, think, discuss, choose and tries to overcome the concept of justice proper to contractualism ensuring respect for the value and dignity of each individual.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuestiones Politicas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuestiones Politicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4176.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Politicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4176.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,目的是从约翰·罗尔斯和玛莎·努斯鲍姆的自由主义视角,采用比较的方法来分析正义。对罗尔斯(1975年、1971年、1986年、1996年、1097年)和努斯鲍姆(1992年、2007年、2012年、2014年、2016年)的作品的文献资料进行了文献综述,同时考虑了该主题专家的方法。它是一种描述性的定性研究,具有理论性、纪实性和历时性的方法论设计。数据收集技术是对作者、文献和内容参考文献进行签名或登记。因此,参照正义概念的一些标准建立了一种分析比较,并通过分析这两位哲学家的假设得出结论,即罗尔斯的理论支持与现实社会相去甚远,假设所有的主要社会商品;自由、平等机会、收入、财富和相互尊重的基础必须以平等的方式分配,而对努斯鲍姆来说,正义必须使其公民有能力思考、思考、讨论、选择并试图克服契约主义特有的正义概念,确保尊重每个人的价值和尊严。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La justicia desde la perspectiva liberal de Rawls y Nussbaum
In this research, the objective was to analyze justice from the liberal perspective of John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum, with a comparative approach. A documentary review of the bibliographic material about the productions of Rawls (1975, 1971, 1986, 1996, 1097), and Nussbaum (1992, 2007, 2012, 2014, 2016) was carried out, also considering the approach of experts in the subject. It is a qualitative research of descriptive type, with methodological design of theoretical, documentary and diachronic cut. The data collection technique was the signing or registration of author, documentary and content references. As a result, an analytical comparison was established referring to some criteria on the notion of justice, and it is concluded by analyzing the postulates of these two philosophers, that the theoretical supports of Rawls, are far from the real society, by assuming that all primary social goods; freedom, equal opportunities, income, wealth and the bases of mutual respect, must be distributed in an equal way, while for Nussbaum justice must produce in its citizens the ability to deliberate, think, discuss, choose and tries to overcome the concept of justice proper to contractualism ensuring respect for the value and dignity of each individual.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cuestiones Politicas
Cuestiones Politicas POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
42.90%
发文量
154
期刊最新文献
Financial responsibility of the state: a comparative analysis of the European countries’ approaches in peacetime and wartime The system of political education as an institute for the professionalization of politics Recognition and normative reconstruction as a theory of justice in Axel Honneth Legislative Support Standards in the European Union in the Field of Building a System of Local Self-Government Features of the Functioning of the Legal System in the Context of Digitalization Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1