边缘性参与:年轻人在公共领域的实践——介于排斥、归属主张和民主创新之间

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Youth & Society Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI:10.1177/0044118X211040848
Ilaria Pitti, Yağmur Mengilli, A. Walther
{"title":"边缘性参与:年轻人在公共领域的实践——介于排斥、归属主张和民主创新之间","authors":"Ilaria Pitti, Yağmur Mengilli, A. Walther","doi":"10.1177/0044118X211040848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing understandings of youth participation often imply clear distinctions from non-participation and thus boundaries between “recognized” and “non-recognized” practices of engagement. This article aims at questioning these boundaries. It analyzes young people’s practices in the public sphere that are characterized by both recognition as participation and misrecognition or stigmatization as deviant and it is suggested to conceptualize such practices as “liminal participation.” The concept of liminality has been developed to describe transitory situations “in-between”—between defined and recognized status positions—and seems helpful for better understanding the blurring boundaries of youth participation. Drawing on qualitative case studies conducted within a European research project, the analysis focuses on how young people whose practices evolve at the margins of the respective societies position themselves with regard to the challenges of liminality and on the potential of this for democratic innovation and change.","PeriodicalId":47959,"journal":{"name":"Youth & Society","volume":"55 1","pages":"143 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liminal Participation: Young People’s Practices in the Public Sphere Between Exclusion, Claims of Belonging, and Democratic Innovation\",\"authors\":\"Ilaria Pitti, Yağmur Mengilli, A. Walther\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0044118X211040848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing understandings of youth participation often imply clear distinctions from non-participation and thus boundaries between “recognized” and “non-recognized” practices of engagement. This article aims at questioning these boundaries. It analyzes young people’s practices in the public sphere that are characterized by both recognition as participation and misrecognition or stigmatization as deviant and it is suggested to conceptualize such practices as “liminal participation.” The concept of liminality has been developed to describe transitory situations “in-between”—between defined and recognized status positions—and seems helpful for better understanding the blurring boundaries of youth participation. Drawing on qualitative case studies conducted within a European research project, the analysis focuses on how young people whose practices evolve at the margins of the respective societies position themselves with regard to the challenges of liminality and on the potential of this for democratic innovation and change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Youth & Society\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"143 - 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Youth & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211040848\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211040848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

对青年参与的现有理解往往意味着与不参与有着明显的区别,因此也意味着“公认”和“不公认”的参与做法之间存在界限。本文旨在质疑这些界限。它分析了年轻人在公共领域的做法,这些做法的特点是既被承认为参与,又被错误承认或污名化为离经叛道,并建议将这种做法概念化为“极限参与”。“界限的概念是为了描述“介于”之间的短暂情况——介于已确定的地位和已确认的地位之间——似乎有助于更好地理解青年参与的模糊边界。该分析借鉴了欧洲研究项目中进行的定性案例研究,重点关注那些在各自社会边缘发展实践的年轻人如何看待边缘化的挑战,以及这对民主创新和变革的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liminal Participation: Young People’s Practices in the Public Sphere Between Exclusion, Claims of Belonging, and Democratic Innovation
Existing understandings of youth participation often imply clear distinctions from non-participation and thus boundaries between “recognized” and “non-recognized” practices of engagement. This article aims at questioning these boundaries. It analyzes young people’s practices in the public sphere that are characterized by both recognition as participation and misrecognition or stigmatization as deviant and it is suggested to conceptualize such practices as “liminal participation.” The concept of liminality has been developed to describe transitory situations “in-between”—between defined and recognized status positions—and seems helpful for better understanding the blurring boundaries of youth participation. Drawing on qualitative case studies conducted within a European research project, the analysis focuses on how young people whose practices evolve at the margins of the respective societies position themselves with regard to the challenges of liminality and on the potential of this for democratic innovation and change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Youth & Society
Youth & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For thirty-five years, Youth & Society has provided educators, counsellors, researchers, and policy makers with the latest research and scholarship in this dynamic field. This valuable resource examines critical contemporary issues and presents vital, practical information for studying and working with young people today. Each quarterly issue of Youth & Society features peer-reviewed articles by distinguished scholars and practitioners from a variety of disciplines and fields, including: sociology, public health, social work, education, criminology, psychology, anthropology, human services, and political science.
期刊最新文献
Conceptualization of Firearm-Related Terms Among Rural Adolescents: Definitions Matter. The Role of School Context Factors for Gender Role Attitudes: General and Differential Associations Between Female and Male Adolescents “We Know About Things Too”: Exploring the Labors of Love Involved in Cultivating Youth Voice in Online Youth Civic Engagement Programs With Youth of Color Recent Trend in the Prevalence and Correlates of Depression Among Chinese Young Adults from 2010 to 2018 Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Adolescent Cannabis Use in Washington State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1