刑事诉讼程序:哈萨克斯坦立法的比较法律研究

L.Ye. Nurlumbayeva, A. Akhpanov
{"title":"刑事诉讼程序:哈萨克斯坦立法的比较法律研究","authors":"L.Ye. Nurlumbayeva, A. Akhpanov","doi":"10.33327/ajee-18-6.1-n000112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Over the past decade, the criminal process of Kazakhstan has undergone significant modernisation, during which many new institutions have been implemented, prescribed, and introduced into national legislation, one of which is writ proceedings in criminal cases.\nThe institution of writ proceedings in the criminal process of Kazakhstan is a type of simplified proceedings that can be applied to criminal offences and criminal cases of minor gravity. One of the main characteristics of writ proceedings is the possibility of considering a criminal case in court without the participation of the accused.\nMethods: The article uses system-structural, formal-logical, comparative-legal, and dialectical research methods. Currently, law enforcement officers have a number of questions regarding the effectiveness of writs in criminal proceedings. In response, the authors of the article offer a constructive and critical approach to solving problems and reject the untenable, irrational, and radical methods presented by some Kazakhstani scientists and practitioners. Moreover, the analysis of successfully tested foreign legislation, in which institutions similar to writ production are actively used, has shown the effectiveness of their application. A comparative legal study of the legislation of Switzerland and Japan was also conducted.\nResults and Conclusions: In the article, the authors propose to consider a set of measures to improve the institution of writ proceedings in the criminal process of the Republic of Kazakhstan.","PeriodicalId":40329,"journal":{"name":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writ Proceedings in Criminal Cases: A Comparative Legal Study of Kazakh Legislation\",\"authors\":\"L.Ye. Nurlumbayeva, A. Akhpanov\",\"doi\":\"10.33327/ajee-18-6.1-n000112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Over the past decade, the criminal process of Kazakhstan has undergone significant modernisation, during which many new institutions have been implemented, prescribed, and introduced into national legislation, one of which is writ proceedings in criminal cases.\\nThe institution of writ proceedings in the criminal process of Kazakhstan is a type of simplified proceedings that can be applied to criminal offences and criminal cases of minor gravity. One of the main characteristics of writ proceedings is the possibility of considering a criminal case in court without the participation of the accused.\\nMethods: The article uses system-structural, formal-logical, comparative-legal, and dialectical research methods. Currently, law enforcement officers have a number of questions regarding the effectiveness of writs in criminal proceedings. In response, the authors of the article offer a constructive and critical approach to solving problems and reject the untenable, irrational, and radical methods presented by some Kazakhstani scientists and practitioners. Moreover, the analysis of successfully tested foreign legislation, in which institutions similar to writ production are actively used, has shown the effectiveness of their application. A comparative legal study of the legislation of Switzerland and Japan was also conducted.\\nResults and Conclusions: In the article, the authors propose to consider a set of measures to improve the institution of writ proceedings in the criminal process of the Republic of Kazakhstan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-6.1-n000112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-6.1-n000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去的十年里,哈萨克斯坦的刑事程序经历了重大的现代化,在此期间,许多新的机构被实施、规定并引入国家立法,其中之一就是刑事案件的令状诉讼。哈萨克斯坦刑事诉讼程序中的令状程序是一种简化程序,可适用于刑事犯罪和情节较轻的刑事案件。令状诉讼的主要特点之一是可以在没有被告参与的情况下在法庭上审理刑事案件。方法:运用系统结构、形式逻辑、比较法学、辩证法等研究方法。目前,执法人员对令状在刑事诉讼中的有效性有许多疑问。作为回应,文章作者提供了一种建设性和批判性的方法来解决问题,并拒绝了一些哈萨克斯坦科学家和从业者提出的站不住脚、不合理和激进的方法。此外,对成功测试的外国立法的分析表明,这些立法积极使用类似于令状制作的制度,这表明了其适用的有效性。还对瑞士和日本的立法进行了法律比较研究。结果和结论:在文章中,作者建议考虑一系列措施来改善哈萨克斯坦共和国刑事诉讼中的令状诉讼制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Writ Proceedings in Criminal Cases: A Comparative Legal Study of Kazakh Legislation
Background: Over the past decade, the criminal process of Kazakhstan has undergone significant modernisation, during which many new institutions have been implemented, prescribed, and introduced into national legislation, one of which is writ proceedings in criminal cases. The institution of writ proceedings in the criminal process of Kazakhstan is a type of simplified proceedings that can be applied to criminal offences and criminal cases of minor gravity. One of the main characteristics of writ proceedings is the possibility of considering a criminal case in court without the participation of the accused. Methods: The article uses system-structural, formal-logical, comparative-legal, and dialectical research methods. Currently, law enforcement officers have a number of questions regarding the effectiveness of writs in criminal proceedings. In response, the authors of the article offer a constructive and critical approach to solving problems and reject the untenable, irrational, and radical methods presented by some Kazakhstani scientists and practitioners. Moreover, the analysis of successfully tested foreign legislation, in which institutions similar to writ production are actively used, has shown the effectiveness of their application. A comparative legal study of the legislation of Switzerland and Japan was also conducted. Results and Conclusions: In the article, the authors propose to consider a set of measures to improve the institution of writ proceedings in the criminal process of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges of Legal Guarantees for the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in International Commercial Cases Advancing Sustainable Justice through AI-Based Case Law Analysis The Implementation of Consensual Tenet in Modern Civil Procedure: Comparative Analysis of Court-Connected Settlement Procedures Applied in Austria, Lithuania, and Ukraine Human Trafficking in Western Balkan: Case Study of Kosovo Towards an Effective Legal Protection for Older Persons in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of International Human Rights Law and Arab Constitutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1