葡萄牙中小学网站:评价建议

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education in the Knowledge Society Pub Date : 2017-09-15 DOI:10.14201/EKS20171833758
A. M. Santos, José Antonio Cordón García, Raquel Gómez Díaz
{"title":"葡萄牙中小学网站:评价建议","authors":"A. M. Santos, José Antonio Cordón García, Raquel Gómez Díaz","doi":"10.14201/EKS20171833758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes an evaluation the quality in educational websites of two degrees of education, Primary School and the High school. To stablish this analysis was used a Model of Evaluation of the Quality of Educational Websites (EQEWS) divided into Functional Aspects, with five criteria: authority, update, usability, accessibility and communication; and Technical-Aesthetic Aspects, with five principles: graphic design and multimedia quality, content, navigation, speed of access and interaction. This propose model of evaluation applied to 57 websites, according to the Likert scale of 0 to 4. We conclude that Secondary School web sites achieved better results in most of the evaluated criteria, it is verified that the authors of these resources are entirely identified with the needs and with the requirement that this degree of education requires the students, with levels of focused on achieving excellent results for university entrance.","PeriodicalId":45123,"journal":{"name":"Education in the Knowledge Society","volume":"18 1","pages":"37-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The websites of primary and secondary schools in Portugal: an evaluation proposal\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Santos, José Antonio Cordón García, Raquel Gómez Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.14201/EKS20171833758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article proposes an evaluation the quality in educational websites of two degrees of education, Primary School and the High school. To stablish this analysis was used a Model of Evaluation of the Quality of Educational Websites (EQEWS) divided into Functional Aspects, with five criteria: authority, update, usability, accessibility and communication; and Technical-Aesthetic Aspects, with five principles: graphic design and multimedia quality, content, navigation, speed of access and interaction. This propose model of evaluation applied to 57 websites, according to the Likert scale of 0 to 4. We conclude that Secondary School web sites achieved better results in most of the evaluated criteria, it is verified that the authors of these resources are entirely identified with the needs and with the requirement that this degree of education requires the students, with levels of focused on achieving excellent results for university entrance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education in the Knowledge Society\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"37-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education in the Knowledge Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14201/EKS20171833758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in the Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/EKS20171833758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文提出对小学和高中两个教育程度的教育网站进行质量评价。为了建立这一分析,使用了教育网站质量评估模型(EQEWS),该模型分为功能方面,具有五个标准:权威性、更新性、可用性、可访问性和沟通性;技术美学方面,有五个原则:平面设计和多媒体质量、内容、导航、访问速度和交互。本文提出的评估模型应用于57个网站,根据Likert量表0到4。我们得出的结论是,中学网站在大多数评估标准中都取得了更好的成绩,经过验证,这些资源的作者完全认同这种教育程度对学生的需求和要求,并专注于在大学入学时取得优异成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The websites of primary and secondary schools in Portugal: an evaluation proposal
This article proposes an evaluation the quality in educational websites of two degrees of education, Primary School and the High school. To stablish this analysis was used a Model of Evaluation of the Quality of Educational Websites (EQEWS) divided into Functional Aspects, with five criteria: authority, update, usability, accessibility and communication; and Technical-Aesthetic Aspects, with five principles: graphic design and multimedia quality, content, navigation, speed of access and interaction. This propose model of evaluation applied to 57 websites, according to the Likert scale of 0 to 4. We conclude that Secondary School web sites achieved better results in most of the evaluated criteria, it is verified that the authors of these resources are entirely identified with the needs and with the requirement that this degree of education requires the students, with levels of focused on achieving excellent results for university entrance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education in the Knowledge Society
Education in the Knowledge Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
10.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Percepción de alumnos y familias sobre la robótica educativa en la educación no formal Redes sociales y Educación Superior en la era COVID-19: Influencia de la trayectoria de aprendizaje de la metodología Self Directed Based Learning en el éxito académico Hábitos de estudio desarrollados durante la complejidad digital en la pandemia: Investigación comparada entre estudiantes universitarios de México y Colombia Análisis de proyectos de buenas prácticas en el marco del programa Erasmus+ centrados en el eLearning o TIC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1