SCOPUS的质量评估和收录标准——三种BH期刊文献计量指标的比较

Emina Adilović
{"title":"SCOPUS的质量评估和收录标准——三种BH期刊文献计量指标的比较","authors":"Emina Adilović","doi":"10.37083/bosn.2022.27.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the selected corpus of journals, this paper aims to analyse the criteria for their inclusion in the bibliographic and citation database Scopus. The paper takes a sample of three scientific journals from Bosnia and Herzegovina – Social Sciences and Humanities Studies, Philologist – Journal of Language, Literary and Cultural Studies and Historical Views. The results of this paper show that the DHS journal follows the official Scopus guidelines, which indicates the lack of a causal relationship between the journal indexing criteria and its implementation in practice – indexing Philologist and Historical Views while rejecting Social Sciences and Humanities Studies. The importance of these results lies in the systematization of criteria for indexing scientific journals in a specific database, as well as in a better understanding of the Scopus inclusion process, guided by a comparison of recent bibliometric indicators.","PeriodicalId":40324,"journal":{"name":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criteria for Quality Assessment and Inclusion in SCOPUS: A Comparison of Bibliometric Indicators in Three BH Journals\",\"authors\":\"Emina Adilović\",\"doi\":\"10.37083/bosn.2022.27.169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the selected corpus of journals, this paper aims to analyse the criteria for their inclusion in the bibliographic and citation database Scopus. The paper takes a sample of three scientific journals from Bosnia and Herzegovina – Social Sciences and Humanities Studies, Philologist – Journal of Language, Literary and Cultural Studies and Historical Views. The results of this paper show that the DHS journal follows the official Scopus guidelines, which indicates the lack of a causal relationship between the journal indexing criteria and its implementation in practice – indexing Philologist and Historical Views while rejecting Social Sciences and Humanities Studies. The importance of these results lies in the systematization of criteria for indexing scientific journals in a specific database, as well as in a better understanding of the Scopus inclusion process, guided by a comparison of recent bibliometric indicators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2022.27.169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bosniaca-Journal of the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37083/bosn.2022.27.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于所选择的期刊语料库,本文旨在分析它们被纳入书目和引文数据库Scopus的标准。本文选取了波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的三本科学期刊——《社会科学与人文研究》、《语言学家》、《文学与文化研究》和《历史观点》。本文的结果表明,国土安全部期刊遵循了官方的Scopus指南,这表明期刊索引标准及其在实践中的实施之间缺乏因果关系——索引文献学家和历史观点,同时拒绝社会科学和人文科学研究。这些结果的重要性在于在特定数据库中为科学期刊编制索引的标准的系统化,以及在比较最近的文献计量指标的指导下更好地理解Scopus收录过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Criteria for Quality Assessment and Inclusion in SCOPUS: A Comparison of Bibliometric Indicators in Three BH Journals
Based on the selected corpus of journals, this paper aims to analyse the criteria for their inclusion in the bibliographic and citation database Scopus. The paper takes a sample of three scientific journals from Bosnia and Herzegovina – Social Sciences and Humanities Studies, Philologist – Journal of Language, Literary and Cultural Studies and Historical Views. The results of this paper show that the DHS journal follows the official Scopus guidelines, which indicates the lack of a causal relationship between the journal indexing criteria and its implementation in practice – indexing Philologist and Historical Views while rejecting Social Sciences and Humanities Studies. The importance of these results lies in the systematization of criteria for indexing scientific journals in a specific database, as well as in a better understanding of the Scopus inclusion process, guided by a comparison of recent bibliometric indicators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Official Bosnian Language at the Beginning of Public Schooling in B&H: Bosniakdom and the Bosnian Language in the Textbooks of Bosnian Franciscans Ambroža Matić and Augustin Miletić The Public Library “Bora Stanković” in Vranje and the COVID-19 Pandemic The Concept of Controlled Digital Lending: Possibilities of Application in Croatian Libraries Linguistics in the Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina The Need for Continuous Professional Development of Librarians - A Benefit to the Individual and Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1