交通基础设施、拥堵和可靠性对心理健康的影响:对实证研究的系统回顾

IF 9.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Transport Reviews Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/01441647.2022.2100943
Marta Aranha Conceição , Mayara Moraes Monteiro , Dena Kasraian , Pauline van den Berg , Sonja Haustein , Inês Alves , Carlos Lima Azevedo , Bruno Miranda
{"title":"交通基础设施、拥堵和可靠性对心理健康的影响:对实证研究的系统回顾","authors":"Marta Aranha Conceição ,&nbsp;Mayara Moraes Monteiro ,&nbsp;Dena Kasraian ,&nbsp;Pauline van den Berg ,&nbsp;Sonja Haustein ,&nbsp;Inês Alves ,&nbsp;Carlos Lima Azevedo ,&nbsp;Bruno Miranda","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2022.2100943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There has been a growing interest in understanding the interdependencies between urbanisation and mental health. Although transportation in cities is complex and of foremost importance to support the mobility of goods and passengers, little is known about how it relates to individual psychological distress. This review aims to provide an up-to-date synthesis of research evidence about the influence of transport infrastructure and operational performance (congestion, delays and reliability) on mental health/wellbeing. It is structured around three main interacting concepts that determined the search/selection of articles: identification of the above-mentioned transport-related exposures; use of psychological and physiological validated instruments; and the outcome on mental health/wellbeing. Ultimately, 69 studies were identified involving an empirical quantitative focus that met the inclusion criteria. We summarise the instruments most reported in these studies and the findings linking transport indicators and psychological and physiological outcomes. Across the review, we identified evidence of the contribution of key transport infrastructure, congestion and delay indicators on negative affective states and psychophysiological distress. Regarding transport reliability, the scarce number of studies identified did not allow for drawing similar firm conclusions. We conclude by discussing some limitations and providing recommendations for future research and policy-making agendas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"43 2","pages":"Pages 264-302"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of transport infrastructure, congestion and reliability on mental wellbeing: a systematic review of empirical studies\",\"authors\":\"Marta Aranha Conceição ,&nbsp;Mayara Moraes Monteiro ,&nbsp;Dena Kasraian ,&nbsp;Pauline van den Berg ,&nbsp;Sonja Haustein ,&nbsp;Inês Alves ,&nbsp;Carlos Lima Azevedo ,&nbsp;Bruno Miranda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01441647.2022.2100943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There has been a growing interest in understanding the interdependencies between urbanisation and mental health. Although transportation in cities is complex and of foremost importance to support the mobility of goods and passengers, little is known about how it relates to individual psychological distress. This review aims to provide an up-to-date synthesis of research evidence about the influence of transport infrastructure and operational performance (congestion, delays and reliability) on mental health/wellbeing. It is structured around three main interacting concepts that determined the search/selection of articles: identification of the above-mentioned transport-related exposures; use of psychological and physiological validated instruments; and the outcome on mental health/wellbeing. Ultimately, 69 studies were identified involving an empirical quantitative focus that met the inclusion criteria. We summarise the instruments most reported in these studies and the findings linking transport indicators and psychological and physiological outcomes. Across the review, we identified evidence of the contribution of key transport infrastructure, congestion and delay indicators on negative affective states and psychophysiological distress. Regarding transport reliability, the scarce number of studies identified did not allow for drawing similar firm conclusions. We conclude by discussing some limitations and providing recommendations for future research and policy-making agendas.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Reviews\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 264-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164723000314\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164723000314","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要人们对理解城市化与心理健康之间的相互依存关系越来越感兴趣。尽管城市交通很复杂,对支持货物和乘客的流动至关重要,但人们对其与个人心理困扰的关系知之甚少。这篇综述旨在提供关于交通基础设施和运营绩效(拥堵、延误和可靠性)对心理健康/幸福感影响的最新研究证据综合。它是围绕三个主要的相互作用概念构建的,这三个概念决定了物品的搜索/选择:识别上述与运输有关的暴露;使用经过心理学和生理学验证的仪器;以及心理健康/幸福感的结果。最终,确定了69项研究,涉及符合纳入标准的实证定量重点。我们总结了这些研究中报道最多的仪器,以及将运输指标与心理和生理结果联系起来的发现。在整个综述中,我们发现了关键交通基础设施、拥堵和延误指标对负面情感状态和心理生理痛苦的影响的证据。关于运输可靠性,所确定的研究数量很少,无法得出类似的确切结论。最后,我们讨论了一些局限性,并为未来的研究和决策议程提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of transport infrastructure, congestion and reliability on mental wellbeing: a systematic review of empirical studies

There has been a growing interest in understanding the interdependencies between urbanisation and mental health. Although transportation in cities is complex and of foremost importance to support the mobility of goods and passengers, little is known about how it relates to individual psychological distress. This review aims to provide an up-to-date synthesis of research evidence about the influence of transport infrastructure and operational performance (congestion, delays and reliability) on mental health/wellbeing. It is structured around three main interacting concepts that determined the search/selection of articles: identification of the above-mentioned transport-related exposures; use of psychological and physiological validated instruments; and the outcome on mental health/wellbeing. Ultimately, 69 studies were identified involving an empirical quantitative focus that met the inclusion criteria. We summarise the instruments most reported in these studies and the findings linking transport indicators and psychological and physiological outcomes. Across the review, we identified evidence of the contribution of key transport infrastructure, congestion and delay indicators on negative affective states and psychophysiological distress. Regarding transport reliability, the scarce number of studies identified did not allow for drawing similar firm conclusions. We conclude by discussing some limitations and providing recommendations for future research and policy-making agendas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
期刊最新文献
Forecasting travel in urban America: the socio-technical life of an engineering modeling world Spatial factors associated with usage of different on-demand elements within mobility hubs: a systematic literature review Measuring transport-associated urban inequalities: Where are we and where do we go from here? Human factors affecting truck – vulnerable road user safety: a scoping review A survey on reinforcement learning-based control for signalized intersections with connected automated vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1