熟能生巧吗?教师教育项目再设计的课程给予与接受

Q2 Social Sciences Action in Teacher Education Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1080/01626620.2021.1955775
Scott Kissau, Hilary Dack, Paul G. Fitchett
{"title":"熟能生巧吗?教师教育项目再设计的课程给予与接受","authors":"Scott Kissau, Hilary Dack, Paul G. Fitchett","doi":"10.1080/01626620.2021.1955775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As teacher preparation programs across the country evolve in response to criticism, declining enrollment, and increasing competition, research is needed to guide and inform their evolution. In response, faculty at one teacher preparation program embarked upon a two-year journey to transform a program to make it more conceptually coherent as well as convenient and affordable. Upon completion, the researchers employed a mixed methods design involving valid and reliable performance assessments, surveys, and interviews to investigate the impact of the re-design on teacher candidate performance and perceptions of their preparation. Results suggested that the changes led to some improvements in candidate performance, but that these improvements may have come at the expense of other knowledge and skills. Despite prioritizing a practice-based teacher education, results indicated that the re-designed program did not provide completers with adequate opportunity to practice skills across the entire program, and as a result, left completers of the re-designed program less confident in their degree of preparation than their peers who completed the original program. The study shares a number of lessons learned that other teacher preparation programs should consider before embarking upon programmatic re-design.","PeriodicalId":52183,"journal":{"name":"Action in Teacher Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"123 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01626620.2021.1955775","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Practice Make Perfect? The Curricular Give and Take of One Teacher Education Program’s Re-design\",\"authors\":\"Scott Kissau, Hilary Dack, Paul G. Fitchett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01626620.2021.1955775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As teacher preparation programs across the country evolve in response to criticism, declining enrollment, and increasing competition, research is needed to guide and inform their evolution. In response, faculty at one teacher preparation program embarked upon a two-year journey to transform a program to make it more conceptually coherent as well as convenient and affordable. Upon completion, the researchers employed a mixed methods design involving valid and reliable performance assessments, surveys, and interviews to investigate the impact of the re-design on teacher candidate performance and perceptions of their preparation. Results suggested that the changes led to some improvements in candidate performance, but that these improvements may have come at the expense of other knowledge and skills. Despite prioritizing a practice-based teacher education, results indicated that the re-designed program did not provide completers with adequate opportunity to practice skills across the entire program, and as a result, left completers of the re-designed program less confident in their degree of preparation than their peers who completed the original program. The study shares a number of lessons learned that other teacher preparation programs should consider before embarking upon programmatic re-design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01626620.2021.1955775\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2021.1955775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2021.1955775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要随着全国各地的教师准备项目在批评、招生人数下降和竞争加剧的情况下不断发展,需要进行研究来指导和告知其发展。作为回应,一个教师准备项目的教员们开始了为期两年的旅程,对一个项目进行改造,使其在概念上更加连贯、方便和负担得起。完成后,研究人员采用了一种混合方法设计,包括有效和可靠的绩效评估、调查和访谈,以调查重新设计对教师候选人绩效和对其准备的看法的影响。结果表明,这些变化导致了候选人表现的一些改善,但这些改善可能是以牺牲其他知识和技能为代价的。尽管优先考虑基于实践的教师教育,但研究结果表明,重新设计的课程并没有为完成者提供足够的机会在整个课程中练习技能,因此,与完成原始课程的同龄人相比,重新设计课程的完成者对自己的准备程度缺乏信心。该研究分享了一些经验教训,其他教师准备计划在开始计划重新设计之前应该考虑这些经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Practice Make Perfect? The Curricular Give and Take of One Teacher Education Program’s Re-design
ABSTRACT As teacher preparation programs across the country evolve in response to criticism, declining enrollment, and increasing competition, research is needed to guide and inform their evolution. In response, faculty at one teacher preparation program embarked upon a two-year journey to transform a program to make it more conceptually coherent as well as convenient and affordable. Upon completion, the researchers employed a mixed methods design involving valid and reliable performance assessments, surveys, and interviews to investigate the impact of the re-design on teacher candidate performance and perceptions of their preparation. Results suggested that the changes led to some improvements in candidate performance, but that these improvements may have come at the expense of other knowledge and skills. Despite prioritizing a practice-based teacher education, results indicated that the re-designed program did not provide completers with adequate opportunity to practice skills across the entire program, and as a result, left completers of the re-designed program less confident in their degree of preparation than their peers who completed the original program. The study shares a number of lessons learned that other teacher preparation programs should consider before embarking upon programmatic re-design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Action in Teacher Education
Action in Teacher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Hurdles and Straightaways: Building a Cross-School Community of Practice White Preservice Teachers and Antiracist Practice: Enabling Trajectories of Learning and Identity in Teacher Preparation Engaging with Engagement: Interrogating Preservice Teachers’ Theories of Engagement in Their Literacy Planning and Reflection Applying an Equity Framework to Develop Inclusive Visions of STEM Teaching: Honoring the Voices of Students with Dis/Abilities Nearby Nature: An Interdisciplinary Science, Literacy, and Technology Project Situated within a Traditional Teacher Preparation Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1