恶性输尿管梗阻患者姑息性经皮肾造口管置入后的生存:验证预后模型

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE Pub Date : 2021-04-23 DOI:10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145
B. Gunawan, K. Foster, J. Hardy, P. Good
{"title":"恶性输尿管梗阻患者姑息性经皮肾造口管置入后的生存:验证预后模型","authors":"B. Gunawan, K. Foster, J. Hardy, P. Good","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) is a life-threatening complication of advanced cancer associated with short survival. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is a commonly employed technique to decompress MUO. Prognostic models have been developed to identify patients with poor outcomes. This study aimed to validate and update the recent model by Alawneh et al. [Alawneh A, Tuqan W, Innabi A, et al. Clinical Factors Associated With a Short Survival Time After Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Ureteric Obstruction in Cancer Patients: An Updated Model. J Pain Symptom Manag 2016;51(2):255–261]. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who received PCN for MUO over a 10-year period. Clinical and demographic details were recorded. Patients were stratified into prognostic groups and survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between prognostic group, individual variables and mortality was investigated. Results 29 patients had received PCN for MUO. When stratified by Alawneh prognostic group, survival was 0.9 months (0 risk factors), 8.4 months (1 factor), 3.4 months (2 factors) and 4.1 months (3 factors). No statistical association was identified between prognostic group and mortality risk (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.92; p = 0.72). The only variable associated with increased mortality was pre-nephrostomy haemoglobin <100 g/L (HR 2.6; p = 0.037). Conclusion Survival with MUO remains short, despite advances in supportive care and PCN. This study was unable to either validate or update the prognostic model, due to limited numbers. Further research with prospective studies is recommended.","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival following palliative percutaneous nephrostomy tube insertion in patients with malignant ureteric obstruction: Validating a prognostic model\",\"authors\":\"B. Gunawan, K. Foster, J. Hardy, P. Good\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aims Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) is a life-threatening complication of advanced cancer associated with short survival. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is a commonly employed technique to decompress MUO. Prognostic models have been developed to identify patients with poor outcomes. This study aimed to validate and update the recent model by Alawneh et al. [Alawneh A, Tuqan W, Innabi A, et al. Clinical Factors Associated With a Short Survival Time After Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Ureteric Obstruction in Cancer Patients: An Updated Model. J Pain Symptom Manag 2016;51(2):255–261]. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who received PCN for MUO over a 10-year period. Clinical and demographic details were recorded. Patients were stratified into prognostic groups and survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between prognostic group, individual variables and mortality was investigated. Results 29 patients had received PCN for MUO. When stratified by Alawneh prognostic group, survival was 0.9 months (0 risk factors), 8.4 months (1 factor), 3.4 months (2 factors) and 4.1 months (3 factors). No statistical association was identified between prognostic group and mortality risk (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.92; p = 0.72). The only variable associated with increased mortality was pre-nephrostomy haemoglobin <100 g/L (HR 2.6; p = 0.037). Conclusion Survival with MUO remains short, despite advances in supportive care and PCN. This study was unable to either validate or update the prognostic model, due to limited numbers. Further research with prospective studies is recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2021.1905145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景与目的恶性输尿管梗阻(MUO)是晚期癌症的一种危及生命的并发症,生存期短。经皮肾造瘘术(PCN)是一种常用的MUO减压技术。已经开发了预后模型来识别预后不佳的患者。本研究旨在验证和更新Alawneh等人的最新模型。[Alanneh A,Tuqan W,Innabi A等人。癌症患者经皮肾造瘘术后生存时间短的临床因素:更新模型。疼痛症状管理杂志2016;51(2):255-261]。方法对10年来接受PCN MUO治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。记录临床和人口统计学细节。将患者分为预后组,并使用Kaplan-Meier方法描述生存率。研究了预后组、个体变量和死亡率之间的关系。结果29例患者接受了PCN治疗。按Alawneh预后组进行分层时,生存期分别为0.9个月(0个危险因素)、8.4个月(1个因素)、3.4个月(2个因素)和4.1个月(3个因素)。预后组和死亡率风险之间没有统计学关联(危险比[HR]0.92;p = 0.72)。与死亡率增加相关的唯一变量是肾造口术前血红蛋白<100 g/L(HR 2.6;p = 0.037)。结论尽管在支持性护理和PCN方面取得了进展,但MUO的生存期仍然很短。由于数量有限,这项研究无法验证或更新预后模型。建议进行进一步的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survival following palliative percutaneous nephrostomy tube insertion in patients with malignant ureteric obstruction: Validating a prognostic model
Background and Aims Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) is a life-threatening complication of advanced cancer associated with short survival. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is a commonly employed technique to decompress MUO. Prognostic models have been developed to identify patients with poor outcomes. This study aimed to validate and update the recent model by Alawneh et al. [Alawneh A, Tuqan W, Innabi A, et al. Clinical Factors Associated With a Short Survival Time After Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Ureteric Obstruction in Cancer Patients: An Updated Model. J Pain Symptom Manag 2016;51(2):255–261]. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who received PCN for MUO over a 10-year period. Clinical and demographic details were recorded. Patients were stratified into prognostic groups and survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between prognostic group, individual variables and mortality was investigated. Results 29 patients had received PCN for MUO. When stratified by Alawneh prognostic group, survival was 0.9 months (0 risk factors), 8.4 months (1 factor), 3.4 months (2 factors) and 4.1 months (3 factors). No statistical association was identified between prognostic group and mortality risk (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.92; p = 0.72). The only variable associated with increased mortality was pre-nephrostomy haemoglobin <100 g/L (HR 2.6; p = 0.037). Conclusion Survival with MUO remains short, despite advances in supportive care and PCN. This study was unable to either validate or update the prognostic model, due to limited numbers. Further research with prospective studies is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.
期刊最新文献
The impact of COVID-19 and community services on palliative care unit admissions: A retrospective cohort study A qualitative evidence synthesis exploring the attitudes, beliefs and values of the long-term care workforce towards palliative care Evidence-based physiotherapy interventions: evaluation of current practice in a palliative care service Feasibility and economic benefits of community-based palliative care in regional Australia: A case study with cost analysis Exploring the competency and confidence levels of physiotherapists in the management of patients diagnosed with life-limiting illnesses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1