{"title":"《武装公民:从古罗马到第二修正案》作者:诺亚·舒斯特曼","authors":"R. Parkinson","doi":"10.1353/ecs.2023.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the year that Armed Citizens was published, Americans bought 22,800,000 guns, shattering all previous records. The exploding gun culture in the United States takes as its mantra the last phrase of the Second Amendment to the Constitution that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Advocates, lobbyists, politicians, and judges who demand total gun freedom ignore the first words of the amendment, that that right is dependent on “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state.” Those defenders rest their arguments upon the “original intent” of “the Founders,” but, Noah Shusterman argues in his excellent examination of the long historical roots of the Second Amendment, when they bypass the first words to get to the “keep and bear” bit, they distort the real purposes of that provision. As a result, Shusterman states in his opening sentence, “the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution no longer makes sense” (1). Without this context—the ideological history of militias—it is impossible to understand what the Second Amendment “meant to the generation that created it” (1).","PeriodicalId":45802,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Armed Citizens: The Road from Ancient Rome to the Second Amendment by Noah Shusterman (review)\",\"authors\":\"R. Parkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ecs.2023.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the year that Armed Citizens was published, Americans bought 22,800,000 guns, shattering all previous records. The exploding gun culture in the United States takes as its mantra the last phrase of the Second Amendment to the Constitution that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Advocates, lobbyists, politicians, and judges who demand total gun freedom ignore the first words of the amendment, that that right is dependent on “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state.” Those defenders rest their arguments upon the “original intent” of “the Founders,” but, Noah Shusterman argues in his excellent examination of the long historical roots of the Second Amendment, when they bypass the first words to get to the “keep and bear” bit, they distort the real purposes of that provision. As a result, Shusterman states in his opening sentence, “the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution no longer makes sense” (1). Without this context—the ideological history of militias—it is impossible to understand what the Second Amendment “meant to the generation that created it” (1).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.0016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.0016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Armed Citizens: The Road from Ancient Rome to the Second Amendment by Noah Shusterman (review)
In the year that Armed Citizens was published, Americans bought 22,800,000 guns, shattering all previous records. The exploding gun culture in the United States takes as its mantra the last phrase of the Second Amendment to the Constitution that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Advocates, lobbyists, politicians, and judges who demand total gun freedom ignore the first words of the amendment, that that right is dependent on “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state.” Those defenders rest their arguments upon the “original intent” of “the Founders,” but, Noah Shusterman argues in his excellent examination of the long historical roots of the Second Amendment, when they bypass the first words to get to the “keep and bear” bit, they distort the real purposes of that provision. As a result, Shusterman states in his opening sentence, “the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution no longer makes sense” (1). Without this context—the ideological history of militias—it is impossible to understand what the Second Amendment “meant to the generation that created it” (1).
期刊介绍:
As the official publication of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS), Eighteenth-Century Studies is committed to publishing the best of current writing on all aspects of eighteenth-century culture. The journal selects essays that employ different modes of analysis and disciplinary discourses to explore how recent historiographical, critical, and theoretical ideas have engaged scholars concerned with the eighteenth century.