捷克共和国的数字创新:发展触发变化模型的内圈

IF 2.9 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI:10.1080/1389224X.2022.2039247
Marta Mrnuštík Konečná, L. Sutherland
{"title":"捷克共和国的数字创新:发展触发变化模型的内圈","authors":"Marta Mrnuštík Konečná, L. Sutherland","doi":"10.1080/1389224X.2022.2039247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose To assess how the primary actors within farmers’ microAKIS (self-assembled knowledge networks) changed as a technology evolved, utilising a case study of precision farming. Methodology Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 farmers in two Czech Regions. Findings The evolution of digital technologies led to an ongoing, incremental pattern of innovation, where innovating (pioneering) and early-adopting farmers experimented and developed new uses for the technologies. Technology suppliers were identified as the most important information sources, but pioneering farmers often exceeded advisors’ knowledge through farmers’ own experimentation, reflecting highly educated farm staff and the Czech history of on-farm experimentation. Pioneering farmers engaged in reciprocal advisory relationships. Practical Implications There may be limited demand for ‘independent’ advice on digital technological issues from large-scale farms. Smaller farms struggled to access both the technology and the advice because technical advice was dependent on prospective equipment purchase. Theoretical Implications Integration of the microAKIS concept and Triggering Change Model demonstrated how the characteristics of the innovation – particularly mutability – influence the role of advisors. Originality Findings advanced the Triggering Change Model by applying it to digital technological innovations and developing the inner circle of ‘co-innovation’, whereby advances to technologies are evaluated and integrated on an ongoing basis.","PeriodicalId":46772,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension","volume":"28 1","pages":"577 - 600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital innovations in the Czech Republic: developing the inner circle of the Triggering Change Model\",\"authors\":\"Marta Mrnuštík Konečná, L. Sutherland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1389224X.2022.2039247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Purpose To assess how the primary actors within farmers’ microAKIS (self-assembled knowledge networks) changed as a technology evolved, utilising a case study of precision farming. Methodology Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 farmers in two Czech Regions. Findings The evolution of digital technologies led to an ongoing, incremental pattern of innovation, where innovating (pioneering) and early-adopting farmers experimented and developed new uses for the technologies. Technology suppliers were identified as the most important information sources, but pioneering farmers often exceeded advisors’ knowledge through farmers’ own experimentation, reflecting highly educated farm staff and the Czech history of on-farm experimentation. Pioneering farmers engaged in reciprocal advisory relationships. Practical Implications There may be limited demand for ‘independent’ advice on digital technological issues from large-scale farms. Smaller farms struggled to access both the technology and the advice because technical advice was dependent on prospective equipment purchase. Theoretical Implications Integration of the microAKIS concept and Triggering Change Model demonstrated how the characteristics of the innovation – particularly mutability – influence the role of advisors. Originality Findings advanced the Triggering Change Model by applying it to digital technological innovations and developing the inner circle of ‘co-innovation’, whereby advances to technologies are evaluated and integrated on an ongoing basis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"577 - 600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2022.2039247\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2022.2039247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要目的利用精准农业的案例研究,评估农民微型AKIS(自组装知识网络)中的主要参与者如何随着技术的发展而变化。方法对捷克两个地区的35名农民进行了半结构化访谈。研究结果数字技术的演变导致了一种持续的、渐进的创新模式,在这种模式下,创新(开拓)和早期采用的农民试验并开发了技术的新用途。技术供应商被认为是最重要的信息来源,但开拓性的农民往往通过农民自己的实验超出了顾问的知识范围,这反映了受过高等教育的农场工作人员和捷克农场实验的历史。开拓性的农民参与互惠咨询关系。实际意义大型农场对数字技术问题的“独立”建议的需求可能有限。较小的农场很难获得技术和建议,因为技术建议取决于未来的设备购买。理论含义microAKIS概念和触发变化模型的整合展示了创新的特征——特别是可变性——如何影响顾问的角色。独创性研究结果将触发变化模型应用于数字技术创新,并发展“共同创新”的核心圈子,从而不断评估和整合技术进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital innovations in the Czech Republic: developing the inner circle of the Triggering Change Model
ABSTRACT Purpose To assess how the primary actors within farmers’ microAKIS (self-assembled knowledge networks) changed as a technology evolved, utilising a case study of precision farming. Methodology Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 farmers in two Czech Regions. Findings The evolution of digital technologies led to an ongoing, incremental pattern of innovation, where innovating (pioneering) and early-adopting farmers experimented and developed new uses for the technologies. Technology suppliers were identified as the most important information sources, but pioneering farmers often exceeded advisors’ knowledge through farmers’ own experimentation, reflecting highly educated farm staff and the Czech history of on-farm experimentation. Pioneering farmers engaged in reciprocal advisory relationships. Practical Implications There may be limited demand for ‘independent’ advice on digital technological issues from large-scale farms. Smaller farms struggled to access both the technology and the advice because technical advice was dependent on prospective equipment purchase. Theoretical Implications Integration of the microAKIS concept and Triggering Change Model demonstrated how the characteristics of the innovation – particularly mutability – influence the role of advisors. Originality Findings advanced the Triggering Change Model by applying it to digital technological innovations and developing the inner circle of ‘co-innovation’, whereby advances to technologies are evaluated and integrated on an ongoing basis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension is published to inform experts who do or use research on agricultural education and extension about research conducted in this field worldwide. Information about this research is needed to improve policies, strategies, methods and practices for agricultural education and extension. The Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension accepts authorative and well-referenced scientific articles within the field of agricultural education and extension after a double-blind peer review process. Agricultural education and extension faces profound change, and therefore its core area of attention is moving towards communication, competence development and performance improvement for a wide variety of fields and audiences, most of which can be studied from a multi-disciplinary perspective, including: -Communication for Development- Competence Management and Development- Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Resource Development- Design and Implementation of Competence–based Education- Environmental and Natural Resource Management- Entrepreneurship and Learning- Facilitating Multiple-Stakeholder Processes- Health and Society- Innovation of Agricultural-Technical Education- Innovation Systems and Learning- Integrated Rural Development- Interdisciplinary and Social Learning- Learning, Conflict and Decision Making- Poverty Reduction- Performance Improvement- Sustainable Agricultural Production
期刊最新文献
Who, how and why? The nature of industry participants in agricultural industry school partnerships in Gippsland, Australia Farmers’ access, demand, and satisfaction with innovation support services and their determinants: the case of the cocoa sector in Central Cameroon Irish dairy farmers’ assessment of their training needs Designing a skills training pathway for the agricultural workforce from the employer perspective: skills micro-credentials from seasonal worker to supervisor Eliciting farmers’ preferences towards agriculture education in northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1