概念化新冠肺炎的“终结”:时间性和线性健康动员

Q3 Social Sciences Review of Communication Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15358593.2022.2066477
H. Tabrizi, Marina Levina
{"title":"概念化新冠肺炎的“终结”:时间性和线性健康动员","authors":"H. Tabrizi, Marina Levina","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2022.2066477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT COVID-19 has crystalized how Western sociopolitical, cultural, and biomedical understandings of health advance the spaciotemporal logic of “the end.” This logic defines health in terms of linear accessibility to cures while ignoring the intersectional mechanisms of systemic inequality. Such logics stress an individual’s ability to mobilize along the timeline of health, ignoring the stoppages shaped by race, class, ability, and gender. This effectively casts public health as a matter of managing individual choice without attending to systems of power. The logic of “the end” works in tandem with the metaphors of “darkness” and “light.” Within the context of COVID-19, these metaphors demarcate health as a universally attainable good defined by Western medicine, whiteness, and normative ability. This temporal logic of the pandemic crystalizes how whiteness and ability shape notions of health in ways that render precariously situated bodies immobile and essentially ill.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"22 1","pages":"110 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizing “the end” of COVID-19: temporality and linear mobilization toward health\",\"authors\":\"H. Tabrizi, Marina Levina\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15358593.2022.2066477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT COVID-19 has crystalized how Western sociopolitical, cultural, and biomedical understandings of health advance the spaciotemporal logic of “the end.” This logic defines health in terms of linear accessibility to cures while ignoring the intersectional mechanisms of systemic inequality. Such logics stress an individual’s ability to mobilize along the timeline of health, ignoring the stoppages shaped by race, class, ability, and gender. This effectively casts public health as a matter of managing individual choice without attending to systems of power. The logic of “the end” works in tandem with the metaphors of “darkness” and “light.” Within the context of COVID-19, these metaphors demarcate health as a universally attainable good defined by Western medicine, whiteness, and normative ability. This temporal logic of the pandemic crystalizes how whiteness and ability shape notions of health in ways that render precariously situated bodies immobile and essentially ill.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Communication\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"110 - 126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2066477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2066477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:新冠肺炎明确了西方社会政治、文化和生物医学对健康的理解如何推进“终结”的时空逻辑。这种逻辑以获得治疗的线性可及性来定义健康,而忽略了系统性不平等的交叉机制。这种逻辑强调个人在健康时间线上动员的能力,而忽略了种族、阶级、能力和性别造成的停顿。这有效地将公共卫生塑造成一个管理个人选择的问题,而不关注权力体系。“终结”的逻辑与“黑暗”和“光明”的隐喻是一致的。在新冠肺炎的背景下,这些隐喻将健康界定为一种普遍可实现的好,由西方医学、白人和规范能力定义。疫情的这种时间逻辑具体化了白人和能力如何塑造健康观念,使处境不稳定的身体无法移动,基本上生病了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conceptualizing “the end” of COVID-19: temporality and linear mobilization toward health
ABSTRACT COVID-19 has crystalized how Western sociopolitical, cultural, and biomedical understandings of health advance the spaciotemporal logic of “the end.” This logic defines health in terms of linear accessibility to cures while ignoring the intersectional mechanisms of systemic inequality. Such logics stress an individual’s ability to mobilize along the timeline of health, ignoring the stoppages shaped by race, class, ability, and gender. This effectively casts public health as a matter of managing individual choice without attending to systems of power. The logic of “the end” works in tandem with the metaphors of “darkness” and “light.” Within the context of COVID-19, these metaphors demarcate health as a universally attainable good defined by Western medicine, whiteness, and normative ability. This temporal logic of the pandemic crystalizes how whiteness and ability shape notions of health in ways that render precariously situated bodies immobile and essentially ill.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Communication
Review of Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Student-to-student confirmation: a review and recommendations for research Theorizing about persuasive message repetition in communication research: a systematic review Students’ peer network quality: effects on academic resilience and intention to persist Marginalizing mortality: the fight against death as the communicative cultural condition Assessing the communicative experience of student orientation leaders: peer and professional
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1