工业化时期苏联计划经济发展的财政政策与激励措施

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Tax Reform Pub Date : 2019-05-13 DOI:10.15826/JTR.2019.5.1.061
S. Sodnomova, Y. Leontyeva
{"title":"工业化时期苏联计划经济发展的财政政策与激励措施","authors":"S. Sodnomova, Y. Leontyeva","doi":"10.15826/JTR.2019.5.1.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is aimed at studying the Soviet fiscal policy and its effects on the country’s economic development in 1926–1940. We used a historical and logical method to research the effectiveness of the two instruments of taxation – the turnover tax and tax charges on profits – and their role in the impressive achievements of the Soviet economy. To analyze and compare the data we used the key indicators of economic development and tax collection for 1926–1940. The results of the analysis have confirmed our hypothesis that the turnover tax and tax charges on profits along with price regulation and planned economy led to the formation of a cost-effective economic model in the USSR. We have shown that this model ensured constant reduction of production costs, accelerated growth of the urban population and unprecedented expansion of heavy industry. Radical simplification of the tax system, which was a part of the 1930s reform, not only had a considerable fiscal effect but also affected social development. The turnover tax and tax charges on profits allowed the government to mobilize considerable resources for investment to stimulate growth in production of heavy industry at a rate of 10–16% a year, which created a multiplier effect in the whole economy. However, financial resources were mobilized at the expense of consumers, since higher taxes were mainly imposed on enterprises of light industry and food industry. This led to “commodity hunger”, the introduction of ration cards, and strict administration. It is concluded that the distinctive feature of the Soviet fiscal policy was its complex nature and subordination to the single goal of the country’s industrialization. For citation Sodnomova S. K., Leontyeva Yu. V. Fiscal policy and incentives for development of the Soviet planned economy in the industrialization period. Journal of Tax Reform. 2019;5(1):70–82. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2019.5.1.061 Article info Received December 20, 2018; accepted March 25, 2019","PeriodicalId":53924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tax Reform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiscal policy and incentives for development of the Soviet planned economy in the industrialization period\",\"authors\":\"S. Sodnomova, Y. Leontyeva\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/JTR.2019.5.1.061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is aimed at studying the Soviet fiscal policy and its effects on the country’s economic development in 1926–1940. We used a historical and logical method to research the effectiveness of the two instruments of taxation – the turnover tax and tax charges on profits – and their role in the impressive achievements of the Soviet economy. To analyze and compare the data we used the key indicators of economic development and tax collection for 1926–1940. The results of the analysis have confirmed our hypothesis that the turnover tax and tax charges on profits along with price regulation and planned economy led to the formation of a cost-effective economic model in the USSR. We have shown that this model ensured constant reduction of production costs, accelerated growth of the urban population and unprecedented expansion of heavy industry. Radical simplification of the tax system, which was a part of the 1930s reform, not only had a considerable fiscal effect but also affected social development. The turnover tax and tax charges on profits allowed the government to mobilize considerable resources for investment to stimulate growth in production of heavy industry at a rate of 10–16% a year, which created a multiplier effect in the whole economy. However, financial resources were mobilized at the expense of consumers, since higher taxes were mainly imposed on enterprises of light industry and food industry. This led to “commodity hunger”, the introduction of ration cards, and strict administration. It is concluded that the distinctive feature of the Soviet fiscal policy was its complex nature and subordination to the single goal of the country’s industrialization. For citation Sodnomova S. K., Leontyeva Yu. V. Fiscal policy and incentives for development of the Soviet planned economy in the industrialization period. Journal of Tax Reform. 2019;5(1):70–82. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2019.5.1.061 Article info Received December 20, 2018; accepted March 25, 2019\",\"PeriodicalId\":53924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tax Reform\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tax Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/JTR.2019.5.1.061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tax Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/JTR.2019.5.1.061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文旨在研究1926-1940年苏联的财政政策及其对国家经济发展的影响。我们用历史和逻辑的方法研究了两种税收工具——流转税和利润税——的有效性,以及它们在苏联经济取得令人瞩目成就中的作用。为了分析和比较数据,我们使用了1926-1940年经济发展和税收的关键指标。分析结果证实了我们的假设,即流转税和利润税以及价格管制和计划经济导致了苏联成本效益经济模式的形成。我们已经证明,这种模式确保了生产成本的不断降低、城市人口的加速增长和重工业的空前扩张。作为20世纪30年代改革的一部分,税收制度的彻底简化不仅产生了相当大的财政影响,而且影响了社会发展。流转税和利润税使政府能够调动大量资源进行投资,以每年10-16%的速度刺激重工业生产的增长,这在整个经济中产生了乘数效应。然而,财政资源的调动是以牺牲消费者为代价的,因为更高的税收主要对轻工业和食品工业的企业征收。这导致了“商品饥饿”、配给卡的引入和严格的管理。结果表明,苏联财政政策的显著特点是其复杂性和服从于国家工业化的单一目标。引用Sodnomova S.K.,Leontyeva Yu。五、工业化时期苏联计划经济发展的财政政策和激励措施。税务改革杂志。2019年;5(1):70–82.DOI:10.15826/jtr.209.5.1.061文章信息收到时间:2018年12月20日;接受日期:2019年3月25日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fiscal policy and incentives for development of the Soviet planned economy in the industrialization period
The article is aimed at studying the Soviet fiscal policy and its effects on the country’s economic development in 1926–1940. We used a historical and logical method to research the effectiveness of the two instruments of taxation – the turnover tax and tax charges on profits – and their role in the impressive achievements of the Soviet economy. To analyze and compare the data we used the key indicators of economic development and tax collection for 1926–1940. The results of the analysis have confirmed our hypothesis that the turnover tax and tax charges on profits along with price regulation and planned economy led to the formation of a cost-effective economic model in the USSR. We have shown that this model ensured constant reduction of production costs, accelerated growth of the urban population and unprecedented expansion of heavy industry. Radical simplification of the tax system, which was a part of the 1930s reform, not only had a considerable fiscal effect but also affected social development. The turnover tax and tax charges on profits allowed the government to mobilize considerable resources for investment to stimulate growth in production of heavy industry at a rate of 10–16% a year, which created a multiplier effect in the whole economy. However, financial resources were mobilized at the expense of consumers, since higher taxes were mainly imposed on enterprises of light industry and food industry. This led to “commodity hunger”, the introduction of ration cards, and strict administration. It is concluded that the distinctive feature of the Soviet fiscal policy was its complex nature and subordination to the single goal of the country’s industrialization. For citation Sodnomova S. K., Leontyeva Yu. V. Fiscal policy and incentives for development of the Soviet planned economy in the industrialization period. Journal of Tax Reform. 2019;5(1):70–82. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2019.5.1.061 Article info Received December 20, 2018; accepted March 25, 2019
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tax Reform
Journal of Tax Reform BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
MSMEs Tax Compliance in Indonesia During Pandemic COVID-19: The Role of Risk Preference as Moderation The influence of foreign ownership on tax avoidance in Thailand: A study from an emerging economy Rationality of the Tax and Economic Behavior of Enterprises in the Russian Forestry Sector Economic Growth and Optimal Tax Burden: A Case of Uzbekistan’s Economy The Impact of Indirect Taxation on Inequality in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1