Noelle A. Paufler, Miriam D. Ezzani, Elizabeth T. Murakami, Jesika Viamontes Quintero, Barbara L. Pazey
{"title":"教育领导博士课程评估:学生声音作为石蕊试金石","authors":"Noelle A. Paufler, Miriam D. Ezzani, Elizabeth T. Murakami, Jesika Viamontes Quintero, Barbara L. Pazey","doi":"10.1177/1942775120976705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines students’ perceptions of an Educational Leadership Doctoral Program’s redesign, based on a multi-criteria framework that informed the program’s core values and beliefs to prepare students to: (a) lead learning organizations; (b) engage ethically with the community; (c) advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion; and (d) develop theory-to-practice solutions. Student voices are expressed through surveys and focus group interviews. Student perceptions of the core values and beliefs were reflected in their experiences. The program evaluation was significant as a critical review of the redesign informing both faculty and students about areas still in need of continuous improvement.","PeriodicalId":51853,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Leadership Education","volume":"17 1","pages":"215 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1942775120976705","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Leadership Doctoral Program Evaluation: Student Voice as the Litmus Test\",\"authors\":\"Noelle A. Paufler, Miriam D. Ezzani, Elizabeth T. Murakami, Jesika Viamontes Quintero, Barbara L. Pazey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1942775120976705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines students’ perceptions of an Educational Leadership Doctoral Program’s redesign, based on a multi-criteria framework that informed the program’s core values and beliefs to prepare students to: (a) lead learning organizations; (b) engage ethically with the community; (c) advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion; and (d) develop theory-to-practice solutions. Student voices are expressed through surveys and focus group interviews. Student perceptions of the core values and beliefs were reflected in their experiences. The program evaluation was significant as a critical review of the redesign informing both faculty and students about areas still in need of continuous improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Leadership Education\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1942775120976705\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Leadership Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775120976705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Leadership Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775120976705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Educational Leadership Doctoral Program Evaluation: Student Voice as the Litmus Test
This study examines students’ perceptions of an Educational Leadership Doctoral Program’s redesign, based on a multi-criteria framework that informed the program’s core values and beliefs to prepare students to: (a) lead learning organizations; (b) engage ethically with the community; (c) advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion; and (d) develop theory-to-practice solutions. Student voices are expressed through surveys and focus group interviews. Student perceptions of the core values and beliefs were reflected in their experiences. The program evaluation was significant as a critical review of the redesign informing both faculty and students about areas still in need of continuous improvement.