Sumba巨石传统:可持续发展的视角

IF 0.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropologie Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anthro.2023.103154
Retno Handini , Jajang Gunawijaya , I. Made Geria , Daud Aris Tanudirjo , Qonitah Basalamah , Harry O. Sofian , M. Ruly Fauzi , Marlon Ririmasse , Cecep Eka Permana
{"title":"Sumba巨石传统:可持续发展的视角","authors":"Retno Handini ,&nbsp;Jajang Gunawijaya ,&nbsp;I. Made Geria ,&nbsp;Daud Aris Tanudirjo ,&nbsp;Qonitah Basalamah ,&nbsp;Harry O. Sofian ,&nbsp;M. Ruly Fauzi ,&nbsp;Marlon Ririmasse ,&nbsp;Cecep Eka Permana","doi":"10.1016/j.anthro.2023.103154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sumba culture is one of the few societies in the world that still preserves its megalithic tradition up to the present day. The tradition of constructing stone graves, which have been in place for hundreds of years, is a testament to the significant sustainable process of Sumba people. This paper discusses research findings that measure the sustainability of the stone grave construction tradition in Sumba, as well as several other factors that support its persistence. The research was conducted using participant observation methodology and included in-depth interviews to gather information regarding sustainability measurement. The data collected were analysed using Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS). The findings indicate that the sustainability status of the stone grave tradition in Sumba is considered unsubstantial. Among the four dimensions measured; the sociocultural factor is the most prominent factor that supports sustainability whereas the economical dimension is the weakest. Therefore, to preserve the heritage for a longer extent, the economic dimension of the tradition would require more absorption from participating parties in the society. Furthermore, this finding is important for professionals who stress the need for more cultural attention to the four supporting dimensions of the sustainability concept which has only been based on economic, environmental, and social factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46860,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologie","volume":"127 3","pages":"Article 103154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sumba megalithic tradition: A sustainability perspective\",\"authors\":\"Retno Handini ,&nbsp;Jajang Gunawijaya ,&nbsp;I. Made Geria ,&nbsp;Daud Aris Tanudirjo ,&nbsp;Qonitah Basalamah ,&nbsp;Harry O. Sofian ,&nbsp;M. Ruly Fauzi ,&nbsp;Marlon Ririmasse ,&nbsp;Cecep Eka Permana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anthro.2023.103154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sumba culture is one of the few societies in the world that still preserves its megalithic tradition up to the present day. The tradition of constructing stone graves, which have been in place for hundreds of years, is a testament to the significant sustainable process of Sumba people. This paper discusses research findings that measure the sustainability of the stone grave construction tradition in Sumba, as well as several other factors that support its persistence. The research was conducted using participant observation methodology and included in-depth interviews to gather information regarding sustainability measurement. The data collected were analysed using Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS). The findings indicate that the sustainability status of the stone grave tradition in Sumba is considered unsubstantial. Among the four dimensions measured; the sociocultural factor is the most prominent factor that supports sustainability whereas the economical dimension is the weakest. Therefore, to preserve the heritage for a longer extent, the economic dimension of the tradition would require more absorption from participating parties in the society. Furthermore, this finding is important for professionals who stress the need for more cultural attention to the four supporting dimensions of the sustainability concept which has only been based on economic, environmental, and social factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropologie\",\"volume\":\"127 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 103154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003552123000407\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologie","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003552123000407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

松巴文化是世界上少数几个至今仍保留其巨石传统的社会之一。建造石头坟墓的传统已经存在了数百年,这是松巴人重要的可持续发展进程的证明。本文讨论了衡量松巴石墓建筑传统可持续性的研究结果,以及支持其持久性的其他几个因素。本研究采用参与式观察法进行,包括深度访谈,以收集有关可持续性测量的信息。采用多维尺度(Multi-Dimensional Scaling, MDS)对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,松巴石墓传统的可持续性状况被认为是不可靠的。在测量的四个维度中;社会文化因素是支持可持续发展的最重要因素,而经济因素是最弱的。因此,为了更长久地保存遗产,传统的经济层面将需要社会参与各方更多地吸收。此外,这一发现对于那些强调需要对可持续发展概念的四个支持维度给予更多文化关注的专业人士来说很重要,这些维度只基于经济、环境和社会因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sumba megalithic tradition: A sustainability perspective

Sumba culture is one of the few societies in the world that still preserves its megalithic tradition up to the present day. The tradition of constructing stone graves, which have been in place for hundreds of years, is a testament to the significant sustainable process of Sumba people. This paper discusses research findings that measure the sustainability of the stone grave construction tradition in Sumba, as well as several other factors that support its persistence. The research was conducted using participant observation methodology and included in-depth interviews to gather information regarding sustainability measurement. The data collected were analysed using Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS). The findings indicate that the sustainability status of the stone grave tradition in Sumba is considered unsubstantial. Among the four dimensions measured; the sociocultural factor is the most prominent factor that supports sustainability whereas the economical dimension is the weakest. Therefore, to preserve the heritage for a longer extent, the economic dimension of the tradition would require more absorption from participating parties in the society. Furthermore, this finding is important for professionals who stress the need for more cultural attention to the four supporting dimensions of the sustainability concept which has only been based on economic, environmental, and social factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropologie
Anthropologie ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: First published in 1890, Anthropologie remains one of the most important journals devoted to prehistoric sciences and paleoanthropology. It regularly publishes thematic issues, originalsarticles and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Les monuments funéraires et cultuels du Sahara central (Algérie) : définitions et classifications Une sépulture mésolithique douteuse sans relation archéo-stratigraphique dans la grotte du Rond-du-Barry (Polignac, Haute-Loire, France) Deux cas de façonnage dentaire rituel au Néolithique en Europe. Dolmen A1 de la nécropole de Chenon (Charente, France) A “shaman” burial from the PPNA settlement of Çemka Höyük, Upper Tigris Basin, Turkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1