利用会计信息预测欧洲集团激进的税收地点决策

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Systems Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101090
Matteo Borrotti, Michele Rabasco, Alessandro Santoro
{"title":"利用会计信息预测欧洲集团激进的税收地点决策","authors":"Matteo Borrotti,&nbsp;Michele Rabasco,&nbsp;Alessandro Santoro","doi":"10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Although locating a company in a tax haven is not illegal per se, it is likely to be part of a scheme purported to erode the </span>tax base<span> or to shift profits to less-taxed jurisdictions. For this reason, this type of location decision is usually targeted by anti-avoidance laws, that can take the form either of specific rules or general standards that, ex-post, sanction or limit the location decision. However, rules entail higher drafting costs and are easy to circumvent whereas standards entail more uncertainty costs. The goal of this paper is to illustrate that the risk of aggressive location decisions can be predicted ex-ante using publicly available data and that this prediction can be used by tax authorities. In the paper, we do two things. First, we use publicly available accounting data for the period 2015–2019 on 4031 group ultimate owners (GUO) of active listed companies resident in one of the 27 European Union countries to predict the probability that these companies would have at least a subsidiary in a tax haven, by spring 2021, as well as the intensity in the use of tax havens. Second, we discuss how this prediction can be used by tax authorities in the context of a new administrative preventive approach that complements the traditional legal approach. This approach can increase welfare by reducing uncertainty, thus increasing investments and economic growth.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51505,"journal":{"name":"Economic Systems","volume":"47 3","pages":"Article 101090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using accounting information to predict aggressive tax location decisions by European groups\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Borrotti,&nbsp;Michele Rabasco,&nbsp;Alessandro Santoro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Although locating a company in a tax haven is not illegal per se, it is likely to be part of a scheme purported to erode the </span>tax base<span> or to shift profits to less-taxed jurisdictions. For this reason, this type of location decision is usually targeted by anti-avoidance laws, that can take the form either of specific rules or general standards that, ex-post, sanction or limit the location decision. However, rules entail higher drafting costs and are easy to circumvent whereas standards entail more uncertainty costs. The goal of this paper is to illustrate that the risk of aggressive location decisions can be predicted ex-ante using publicly available data and that this prediction can be used by tax authorities. In the paper, we do two things. First, we use publicly available accounting data for the period 2015–2019 on 4031 group ultimate owners (GUO) of active listed companies resident in one of the 27 European Union countries to predict the probability that these companies would have at least a subsidiary in a tax haven, by spring 2021, as well as the intensity in the use of tax havens. Second, we discuss how this prediction can be used by tax authorities in the context of a new administrative preventive approach that complements the traditional legal approach. This approach can increase welfare by reducing uncertainty, thus increasing investments and economic growth.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Systems\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362523000195\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362523000195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然将公司设在避税天堂本身并不违法,但这很可能是一项旨在侵蚀税基或将利润转移到税收较低的司法管辖区的计划的一部分。因此,这种类型的选址决策通常是反避税法的目标,可以采取具体规则或一般标准的形式,事后,制裁或限制选址决策。然而,规则需要更高的起草成本,并且很容易规避,而标准则需要更多的不确定性成本。本文的目的是说明激进的位置决策的风险可以预先使用公开可用的数据进行预测,并且这种预测可以被税务机关使用。在论文中,我们做两件事。首先,我们使用2015-2019年期间的公开会计数据,对居住在27个欧盟国家之一的活跃上市公司的4031个集团最终所有者(GUO)进行了预测,预测到2021年春季,这些公司在避税天堂至少拥有一家子公司的可能性,以及使用避税天堂的强度。其次,我们讨论了税务机关如何在新的行政预防方法的背景下使用这一预测,以补充传统的法律方法。这种方法可以通过减少不确定性来增加福利,从而增加投资和经济增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using accounting information to predict aggressive tax location decisions by European groups

Although locating a company in a tax haven is not illegal per se, it is likely to be part of a scheme purported to erode the tax base or to shift profits to less-taxed jurisdictions. For this reason, this type of location decision is usually targeted by anti-avoidance laws, that can take the form either of specific rules or general standards that, ex-post, sanction or limit the location decision. However, rules entail higher drafting costs and are easy to circumvent whereas standards entail more uncertainty costs. The goal of this paper is to illustrate that the risk of aggressive location decisions can be predicted ex-ante using publicly available data and that this prediction can be used by tax authorities. In the paper, we do two things. First, we use publicly available accounting data for the period 2015–2019 on 4031 group ultimate owners (GUO) of active listed companies resident in one of the 27 European Union countries to predict the probability that these companies would have at least a subsidiary in a tax haven, by spring 2021, as well as the intensity in the use of tax havens. Second, we discuss how this prediction can be used by tax authorities in the context of a new administrative preventive approach that complements the traditional legal approach. This approach can increase welfare by reducing uncertainty, thus increasing investments and economic growth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Systems
Economic Systems ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Economic Systems is a refereed journal for the analysis of causes and consequences of the significant institutional variety prevailing among developed, developing, and emerging economies, as well as attempts at and proposals for their reform. The journal is open to micro and macro contributions, theoretical as well as empirical, the latter to analyze related topics against the background of country or region-specific experiences. In this respect, Economic Systems retains its long standing interest in the emerging economies of Central and Eastern Europe and other former transition economies, but also encourages contributions that cover any part of the world, including Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, or Africa.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Comovement and Global Imbalances of Current Accounts Demographic transition and inflation The impact of the heterogenous fiscal policy stance of euro-area member states on ECB monetary policy Environmental protection taxes and green productivity: Evidence from listed companies in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1