COP26:这对农业部门意味着什么?

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Outlooks on Pest Management Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1564/v33_feb_01
R. Blake
{"title":"COP26:这对农业部门意味着什么?","authors":"R. Blake","doi":"10.1564/v33_feb_01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change challenges and the urgent need to take things seriously were once again thrust into the spotlight in October and November 2021 with the 26th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) held in Glasgow under the presidency of the United Kingdom, in partnership with\n Italy. COP stands for Conference of the Parties, and the summit was attended by the countries that signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) ? a treaty agreed in 1994. Billed by many as the most significant climate event since the 2015 Paris Agreement, COP26\n aimed to accelerate action towards the goals of both the UNFCCC treaty and Paris Agreement, such as for every country to work together to limit global warming to 1.5°C. Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) were central to the Paris Agreement and outlined efforts from each country\n to reduce national emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. Unfortunately, the commitments laid out in Paris in 2015 did not come close to achieving the 1.5°C target, and with the window for action becoming ever smaller, there was substantial pressure on Glasgow to deliver\n something meaningful. Following two weeks of intense negotiations, COP26 finally ended with nearly 200 countries agreeing the Glasgow Climate Pact. Crucially this pact keeps the 1.5°C reduction alive and completes the Paris Rulebook, a set of guidelines for how the Paris Agreement will\n be delivered including a transparency process to hold countries accountable as they deliver on their targets. But what about agriculture? Despite being the second largest driver of climate change behind the energy sector, and therefore central to meeting emissions reductions and achieving\n the 1.5°C target, the general consensus was that the agriculture sector did not feature prominently enough at COP26, and that reliance on major pledges and pacts disguised a lack of detail on exactly how action would be achieved. Under the UNFCCC there is only one program focussed on agriculture\n ? the Koronivia Joint Work on Agriculture (KJWA) which was established at COP23 in 2017 and aims to address agricultural issues through the lens of climate change. It is composed of six interrelated topics, namely soils, nutrient use, water, livestock, methods for assessing adaptation, and\n the socioeconomic and food security dimensions of climate change across the agricultural sectors. The process was scheduled to finish at COP26; however, by the end of the meeting there were still many areas of disagreement and so these will need to be ironed out in the future. Furthermore,\n despite pledging action, none of the updated NDCs submitted by the G20 nations prior to COP26 included specific targets on how commitments made for their agricultural sectors would actually be achieved in practice. Many of the current challenges in agriculture are political in nature, whether\n it is the desire of developed countries to reduce meat and dairy consumption and move towards more plant-based diets, or the reluctance of developing countries to agree, or discussions on farm subsidies, so it is perhaps not surprising that these challenges were not tackled. Agriculture plays\n a key role on both sides of the climate change debate as both a source and sink for emissions. Approximately 20% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions including carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide come from agriculture, forestry and land use. This value increases to\n 31% when considered across the whole agrifood system that includes crops and livestock. When split individually, agrifood systems globally account for 21% of carbon dioxide emissions, 53% of methane emissions and 78% of nitrous oxide emissions. Whilst the principal GHG emitted by most sectors\n is carbon dioxide, the agricultural sector is unusual in that direct emissions of methane and nitrous oxide, in particular, are far higher. Given the importance of these GHGs both as key drivers of climate change, and to the agricultural sector, it is timely to review COP26 discussions in\n this area.","PeriodicalId":19602,"journal":{"name":"Outlooks on Pest Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COP26: What Does It Mean for the Agriculture Sector?\",\"authors\":\"R. Blake\",\"doi\":\"10.1564/v33_feb_01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Climate change challenges and the urgent need to take things seriously were once again thrust into the spotlight in October and November 2021 with the 26th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) held in Glasgow under the presidency of the United Kingdom, in partnership with\\n Italy. COP stands for Conference of the Parties, and the summit was attended by the countries that signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) ? a treaty agreed in 1994. Billed by many as the most significant climate event since the 2015 Paris Agreement, COP26\\n aimed to accelerate action towards the goals of both the UNFCCC treaty and Paris Agreement, such as for every country to work together to limit global warming to 1.5°C. Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) were central to the Paris Agreement and outlined efforts from each country\\n to reduce national emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. Unfortunately, the commitments laid out in Paris in 2015 did not come close to achieving the 1.5°C target, and with the window for action becoming ever smaller, there was substantial pressure on Glasgow to deliver\\n something meaningful. Following two weeks of intense negotiations, COP26 finally ended with nearly 200 countries agreeing the Glasgow Climate Pact. Crucially this pact keeps the 1.5°C reduction alive and completes the Paris Rulebook, a set of guidelines for how the Paris Agreement will\\n be delivered including a transparency process to hold countries accountable as they deliver on their targets. But what about agriculture? Despite being the second largest driver of climate change behind the energy sector, and therefore central to meeting emissions reductions and achieving\\n the 1.5°C target, the general consensus was that the agriculture sector did not feature prominently enough at COP26, and that reliance on major pledges and pacts disguised a lack of detail on exactly how action would be achieved. Under the UNFCCC there is only one program focussed on agriculture\\n ? the Koronivia Joint Work on Agriculture (KJWA) which was established at COP23 in 2017 and aims to address agricultural issues through the lens of climate change. It is composed of six interrelated topics, namely soils, nutrient use, water, livestock, methods for assessing adaptation, and\\n the socioeconomic and food security dimensions of climate change across the agricultural sectors. The process was scheduled to finish at COP26; however, by the end of the meeting there were still many areas of disagreement and so these will need to be ironed out in the future. Furthermore,\\n despite pledging action, none of the updated NDCs submitted by the G20 nations prior to COP26 included specific targets on how commitments made for their agricultural sectors would actually be achieved in practice. Many of the current challenges in agriculture are political in nature, whether\\n it is the desire of developed countries to reduce meat and dairy consumption and move towards more plant-based diets, or the reluctance of developing countries to agree, or discussions on farm subsidies, so it is perhaps not surprising that these challenges were not tackled. Agriculture plays\\n a key role on both sides of the climate change debate as both a source and sink for emissions. Approximately 20% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions including carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide come from agriculture, forestry and land use. This value increases to\\n 31% when considered across the whole agrifood system that includes crops and livestock. When split individually, agrifood systems globally account for 21% of carbon dioxide emissions, 53% of methane emissions and 78% of nitrous oxide emissions. Whilst the principal GHG emitted by most sectors\\n is carbon dioxide, the agricultural sector is unusual in that direct emissions of methane and nitrous oxide, in particular, are far higher. Given the importance of these GHGs both as key drivers of climate change, and to the agricultural sector, it is timely to review COP26 discussions in\\n this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Outlooks on Pest Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Outlooks on Pest Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1564/v33_feb_01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Outlooks on Pest Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1564/v33_feb_01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2021年10月和11月,英国与意大利合作,在格拉斯哥举行了第26届联合国气候变化大会(COP26),气候变化挑战和认真对待问题的迫切需要再次成为人们关注的焦点。COP代表缔约方大会,签署《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)的国家出席了峰会?1994年达成的一项条约。COP26被许多人称为自2015年《巴黎协定》以来最重要的气候事件,旨在加快实现《联合国气候变化框架公约》条约和《巴黎协定,例如每个国家共同努力将全球变暖限制在1.5°C以内。国家自主贡献是《巴黎协定》的核心,并概述了每个国家为减少国家排放和适应气候变化影响所做的努力。不幸的是,2015年在巴黎做出的承诺并没有接近1.5°C的目标,而且随着行动窗口越来越小,格拉斯哥面临着巨大的压力,需要做出有意义的事情。经过两周的紧张谈判,COP26最终以近200个国家同意《格拉斯哥气候公约》而告终。至关重要的是,这项协议保持了1.5°C的减排,并完善了《巴黎规则手册》,这是一套关于如何实现《巴黎协定》的指导方针,包括一个透明程序,让各国在实现目标时承担责任。但是农业呢?尽管农业是仅次于能源部门的第二大气候变化驱动力,因此也是实现减排和1.5°C目标的核心,但普遍的共识是,农业部门在COP26上的地位不够突出,对主要承诺和协议的依赖掩盖了对如何实现行动缺乏细节。根据《联合国气候变化框架公约》,只有一个项目侧重于农业?Koronivia农业联合工作(KJWA)于2017年在COP23上成立,旨在通过气候变化的视角解决农业问题。它由六个相互关联的主题组成,即土壤、养分利用、水、牲畜、评估适应的方法,以及整个农业部门气候变化的社会经济和粮食安全层面。这一进程计划在第二十六届缔约方大会上结束;然而,到会议结束时,仍有许多领域存在分歧,因此这些问题需要在未来解决。此外,尽管承诺采取行动,但G20国家在COP26之前提交的最新NDC中没有一个包含如何在实践中实际实现其农业部门承诺的具体目标。目前农业中的许多挑战都是政治性的,无论是发达国家希望减少肉类和乳制品消费,转向更多的植物性饮食,还是发展中国家不愿同意,或者讨论农业补贴,因此这些挑战没有得到解决也许并不奇怪。农业作为排放源和汇,在气候变化辩论的双方都发挥着关键作用。包括二氧化碳、甲烷和一氧化二氮在内的全球人为温室气体排放约20%来自农业、林业和土地利用。当考虑到包括作物和牲畜在内的整个农业食品系统时,这一数值将增加到31%。单独划分时,全球农业食品系统的二氧化碳排放量占21%,甲烷排放量占53%,一氧化二氮排放量占78%。虽然大多数部门排放的主要温室气体是二氧化碳,但农业部门的不同寻常之处在于,甲烷和一氧化二氮的直接排放量要高得多。鉴于这些温室气体作为气候变化的关键驱动因素和对农业部门的重要性,审查COP26在这一领域的讨论是及时的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COP26: What Does It Mean for the Agriculture Sector?
Climate change challenges and the urgent need to take things seriously were once again thrust into the spotlight in October and November 2021 with the 26th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) held in Glasgow under the presidency of the United Kingdom, in partnership with Italy. COP stands for Conference of the Parties, and the summit was attended by the countries that signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) ? a treaty agreed in 1994. Billed by many as the most significant climate event since the 2015 Paris Agreement, COP26 aimed to accelerate action towards the goals of both the UNFCCC treaty and Paris Agreement, such as for every country to work together to limit global warming to 1.5°C. Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) were central to the Paris Agreement and outlined efforts from each country to reduce national emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. Unfortunately, the commitments laid out in Paris in 2015 did not come close to achieving the 1.5°C target, and with the window for action becoming ever smaller, there was substantial pressure on Glasgow to deliver something meaningful. Following two weeks of intense negotiations, COP26 finally ended with nearly 200 countries agreeing the Glasgow Climate Pact. Crucially this pact keeps the 1.5°C reduction alive and completes the Paris Rulebook, a set of guidelines for how the Paris Agreement will be delivered including a transparency process to hold countries accountable as they deliver on their targets. But what about agriculture? Despite being the second largest driver of climate change behind the energy sector, and therefore central to meeting emissions reductions and achieving the 1.5°C target, the general consensus was that the agriculture sector did not feature prominently enough at COP26, and that reliance on major pledges and pacts disguised a lack of detail on exactly how action would be achieved. Under the UNFCCC there is only one program focussed on agriculture ? the Koronivia Joint Work on Agriculture (KJWA) which was established at COP23 in 2017 and aims to address agricultural issues through the lens of climate change. It is composed of six interrelated topics, namely soils, nutrient use, water, livestock, methods for assessing adaptation, and the socioeconomic and food security dimensions of climate change across the agricultural sectors. The process was scheduled to finish at COP26; however, by the end of the meeting there were still many areas of disagreement and so these will need to be ironed out in the future. Furthermore, despite pledging action, none of the updated NDCs submitted by the G20 nations prior to COP26 included specific targets on how commitments made for their agricultural sectors would actually be achieved in practice. Many of the current challenges in agriculture are political in nature, whether it is the desire of developed countries to reduce meat and dairy consumption and move towards more plant-based diets, or the reluctance of developing countries to agree, or discussions on farm subsidies, so it is perhaps not surprising that these challenges were not tackled. Agriculture plays a key role on both sides of the climate change debate as both a source and sink for emissions. Approximately 20% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions including carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide come from agriculture, forestry and land use. This value increases to 31% when considered across the whole agrifood system that includes crops and livestock. When split individually, agrifood systems globally account for 21% of carbon dioxide emissions, 53% of methane emissions and 78% of nitrous oxide emissions. Whilst the principal GHG emitted by most sectors is carbon dioxide, the agricultural sector is unusual in that direct emissions of methane and nitrous oxide, in particular, are far higher. Given the importance of these GHGs both as key drivers of climate change, and to the agricultural sector, it is timely to review COP26 discussions in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Outlooks on Pest Management
Outlooks on Pest Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Research and development in the crop protection and crop enhancement sector continues to grow at pace. Those associated with the agriculture and food industries, researchers in academia, government organisations, legislators, and professionals involved with the development and environmental impact of pesticides and biotechnology can all benefit from Outlooks on Pest Management. This bi-monthly journal provides a unique blend of international news and reviews covering all aspects of the management of weeds, pests and diseases through chemistry, biology and biotechnology.
期刊最新文献
The Annual Biocontrol Industry Meeting (ABIM) 2023 Invasive Species Impact in Agriculture: Striking a Balance Between Productivity, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Health The Need to Use Different Ways of Applying Pesticides R&D News Tighter Regulations Regarding Pesticides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1