{"title":"分析资本结构和所有权结构对公司绩效的影响","authors":"Dellia Santi Noviastuti, Ika Sasti Ferina, Rini Yayuk Priyati","doi":"10.22219/jrak.v12i2.20645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study extends examining the effect of capital structure (Debt Equity Ratio) on firm performance (Tobin’s q dan ROA), quadratic (concave) effect of capital structure on firm performance, the effect of Multiple Large Shareholder Structure (MLSS) and institutional ownership on firm performance. This study differ from previous studies by pinpointing the category of debt to calculate Debt to Equity Ratio. The sample of this study is 424 observations from 53 non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange including Index Kompas 100 from 2013 to 2020. Using fixed effect panel regression, this research finds inconsistent evidence that capital structure has insignificant negative effect on firm performance and has not a quadratic (concave) effect on firm performance. This study finds MLSS have insignificant negative effect on firm performance. This result could be caused by ownership structure in Indonesia is concentrated and percentage of MLSS is small. MLSS can not monitor the largest shareholder. This study also finds institutional ownership has insignificant negative effect on firm performance. This result could be caused by percentage of institusional owneship is small that can not monitoring manager behaviour in determining debt and dividen policy.\n ","PeriodicalId":52995,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis Pengaruh Struktur Modal Dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan\",\"authors\":\"Dellia Santi Noviastuti, Ika Sasti Ferina, Rini Yayuk Priyati\",\"doi\":\"10.22219/jrak.v12i2.20645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study extends examining the effect of capital structure (Debt Equity Ratio) on firm performance (Tobin’s q dan ROA), quadratic (concave) effect of capital structure on firm performance, the effect of Multiple Large Shareholder Structure (MLSS) and institutional ownership on firm performance. This study differ from previous studies by pinpointing the category of debt to calculate Debt to Equity Ratio. The sample of this study is 424 observations from 53 non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange including Index Kompas 100 from 2013 to 2020. Using fixed effect panel regression, this research finds inconsistent evidence that capital structure has insignificant negative effect on firm performance and has not a quadratic (concave) effect on firm performance. This study finds MLSS have insignificant negative effect on firm performance. This result could be caused by ownership structure in Indonesia is concentrated and percentage of MLSS is small. MLSS can not monitor the largest shareholder. This study also finds institutional ownership has insignificant negative effect on firm performance. This result could be caused by percentage of institusional owneship is small that can not monitoring manager behaviour in determining debt and dividen policy.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":52995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i2.20645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i2.20645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究扩展考察了资本结构(债务权益比率)对企业绩效的影响(Tobin’s q dan ROA)、资本结构对企业绩效二次(凹)效应、多大股东结构(MLSS)和机构所有权对企业绩效影响。这项研究与以往的研究不同,它精确地确定了债务的类别来计算债务与股本比率。本研究的样本是2013年至2020年在印度尼西亚证券交易所上市的53家非金融公司的424个观察结果,包括Kompas 100指数。利用固定效应面板回归,本研究发现资本结构对企业绩效的负面影响不显著,而对企业绩效没有二次(凹)效应。本研究发现MLSS对企业绩效的负面影响不显著。这种结果可能是由于印尼的所有权结构集中,MLSS所占比例较小。MLSS无法监控最大股东。本研究还发现,机构所有权对企业绩效的负面影响并不显著。这一结果可能是由于机构所有权比例较小,无法在确定债务和分配政策时监控管理者的行为。
Analisis Pengaruh Struktur Modal Dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan
This study extends examining the effect of capital structure (Debt Equity Ratio) on firm performance (Tobin’s q dan ROA), quadratic (concave) effect of capital structure on firm performance, the effect of Multiple Large Shareholder Structure (MLSS) and institutional ownership on firm performance. This study differ from previous studies by pinpointing the category of debt to calculate Debt to Equity Ratio. The sample of this study is 424 observations from 53 non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange including Index Kompas 100 from 2013 to 2020. Using fixed effect panel regression, this research finds inconsistent evidence that capital structure has insignificant negative effect on firm performance and has not a quadratic (concave) effect on firm performance. This study finds MLSS have insignificant negative effect on firm performance. This result could be caused by ownership structure in Indonesia is concentrated and percentage of MLSS is small. MLSS can not monitor the largest shareholder. This study also finds institutional ownership has insignificant negative effect on firm performance. This result could be caused by percentage of institusional owneship is small that can not monitoring manager behaviour in determining debt and dividen policy.