波兰总统?1941年至1944年占领期间城市建设的建立和运作。

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Istorija 20. veka Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.29362/ist20veka.2022.2.tuc.345-360
Radosav Tucović
{"title":"波兰总统?1941年至1944年占领期间城市建设的建立和运作。","authors":"Radosav Tucović","doi":"10.29362/ist20veka.2022.2.tuc.345-360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of collaboration has provoked much debate since the end of the Second World War. Appearances of collaboration, diversity depending on geographical location, plans of the Third Reich for a particular country and others were some main phenomena analyzed. However, to adequately study the form of collaboration, it is necessary to start from the legal framework that defined the phenomenon itself. In the pre-war Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the Belgrade City Administration was part of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The institution of the same name was formed after the beginning of the occupation in 1941. However, it was established in multiple violations of The Hague Conventions and following the decisions of the Third Reich. Organizational changes made to the Belgrade City Administration adjusted it to the occupation system. All of this was against the provisions of The Hague Conventions, which were supposed to determine the form of occupation and be compulsory for Germany. The purpose of this article is to examine the establishment and functioning of the Belgrade City Administration under occupation from the perspective of international law. The legal framework is put in the context of the historical facts and used to analyze comparative experiences in the case of France and Belgium. Thus, the global context of the plans of the Third Reich and the executive practice in the creation of occupation systems in the west of Europe, are compared to the establishment of the Belgrade City Administration, as an occupation institution of domestic origin.","PeriodicalId":14520,"journal":{"name":"Istorija 20. veka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRAVNA OBAVEZA ILI KOLABORACIJA? USPOSTAVLJANJE I FUNKCIONISANJE UPRAVE GRADA BEOGRADA POD OKUPACIJOM 1941–1944.\",\"authors\":\"Radosav Tucović\",\"doi\":\"10.29362/ist20veka.2022.2.tuc.345-360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of collaboration has provoked much debate since the end of the Second World War. Appearances of collaboration, diversity depending on geographical location, plans of the Third Reich for a particular country and others were some main phenomena analyzed. However, to adequately study the form of collaboration, it is necessary to start from the legal framework that defined the phenomenon itself. In the pre-war Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the Belgrade City Administration was part of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The institution of the same name was formed after the beginning of the occupation in 1941. However, it was established in multiple violations of The Hague Conventions and following the decisions of the Third Reich. Organizational changes made to the Belgrade City Administration adjusted it to the occupation system. All of this was against the provisions of The Hague Conventions, which were supposed to determine the form of occupation and be compulsory for Germany. The purpose of this article is to examine the establishment and functioning of the Belgrade City Administration under occupation from the perspective of international law. The legal framework is put in the context of the historical facts and used to analyze comparative experiences in the case of France and Belgium. Thus, the global context of the plans of the Third Reich and the executive practice in the creation of occupation systems in the west of Europe, are compared to the establishment of the Belgrade City Administration, as an occupation institution of domestic origin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Istorija 20. veka\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Istorija 20. veka\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2022.2.tuc.345-360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istorija 20. veka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2022.2.tuc.345-360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自第二次世界大战结束以来,合作问题引发了许多争论。合作的出现、取决于地理位置的多样性、第三帝国对特定国家的计划等是分析的一些主要现象。然而,为了充分研究合作的形式,有必要从定义这种现象本身的法律框架开始。在战前的南斯拉夫王国,贝尔格莱德城市管理局是内务部的一部分。这个同名机构是在1941年占领开始后成立的。然而,它是在多次违反《海牙公约》和遵循第三帝国决定的情况下成立的。贝尔格莱德城市管理局的组织变动使其适应占领制度。所有这些都违反了《海牙公约》的规定,该公约本应确定占领的形式,并对德国具有强制性。本条的目的是从国际法的角度审查贝尔格莱德城市管理局在占领下的设立和运作情况。该法律框架被置于历史事实的背景下,并用于分析法国和比利时案件的比较经验。因此,将第三帝国计划的全球背景和在西欧建立占领制度的执行实践与贝尔格莱德城市管理局的建立进行比较,后者是一个起源于国内的占领机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PRAVNA OBAVEZA ILI KOLABORACIJA? USPOSTAVLJANJE I FUNKCIONISANJE UPRAVE GRADA BEOGRADA POD OKUPACIJOM 1941–1944.
The issue of collaboration has provoked much debate since the end of the Second World War. Appearances of collaboration, diversity depending on geographical location, plans of the Third Reich for a particular country and others were some main phenomena analyzed. However, to adequately study the form of collaboration, it is necessary to start from the legal framework that defined the phenomenon itself. In the pre-war Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the Belgrade City Administration was part of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The institution of the same name was formed after the beginning of the occupation in 1941. However, it was established in multiple violations of The Hague Conventions and following the decisions of the Third Reich. Organizational changes made to the Belgrade City Administration adjusted it to the occupation system. All of this was against the provisions of The Hague Conventions, which were supposed to determine the form of occupation and be compulsory for Germany. The purpose of this article is to examine the establishment and functioning of the Belgrade City Administration under occupation from the perspective of international law. The legal framework is put in the context of the historical facts and used to analyze comparative experiences in the case of France and Belgium. Thus, the global context of the plans of the Third Reich and the executive practice in the creation of occupation systems in the west of Europe, are compared to the establishment of the Belgrade City Administration, as an occupation institution of domestic origin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Istorija 20. veka
Istorija 20. veka Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
ИМЕНИЯ ВЕЛИКОГО КНЯЗЯ МИХАИЛА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧА. ЛИЦА И СУДЬБЫ. СЕРБСКИЙ СЛЕД SVETSKA, TRANSNACIONALNA I GLOBALNA ISTORIJA – ISTORIOGRAFIJA ZA UMREŽENA DRUŠTVA 21. STOLEĆA? REGIONALNA PISMENOST U JUGOSLAVIJI SA POSEBNIM OSVRTOM NA CRNU GORU ČETRDESET GODINA ČASOPISA „ISTORIJA 20. VEKA“ 1983‒2023. PRINC ĐORĐE KARAĐORĐEVIĆ U OKUPIRANOJ SRBIJI 1941–1944.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1