波兰ordynacje和英国普通法带来和严格的解决:社会、政治和宗教的比较背景

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW Comparative Legal History Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/2049677X.2022.2131527
Lukasz Jan Korporowicz, J. G. Owen
{"title":"波兰ordynacje和英国普通法带来和严格的解决:社会、政治和宗教的比较背景","authors":"Lukasz Jan Korporowicz, J. G. Owen","doi":"10.1080/2049677X.2022.2131527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entailing landed property was a common feature of European property law in the late medieval and early modern periods, and beyond. Entails were far more common in some European states than others. This article undertakes comparative research into different forms of entailed property in Poland (where entails were uncommon) and England and Wales (where entails were common). It also undertakes comparative analysis with the later English common law strict settlement, which had the entail at its core. It investigates who created such settlements; why they were created; the different methods of creation; the attitude of the state/royal government; who benefitted under such settlements; inalienability of land; and perpetuity.","PeriodicalId":53815,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legal History","volume":"10 1","pages":"172 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polish ordynacje and the English common law entail and strict settlement: Social, political, and religious comparative contexts\",\"authors\":\"Lukasz Jan Korporowicz, J. G. Owen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2049677X.2022.2131527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Entailing landed property was a common feature of European property law in the late medieval and early modern periods, and beyond. Entails were far more common in some European states than others. This article undertakes comparative research into different forms of entailed property in Poland (where entails were uncommon) and England and Wales (where entails were common). It also undertakes comparative analysis with the later English common law strict settlement, which had the entail at its core. It investigates who created such settlements; why they were created; the different methods of creation; the attitude of the state/royal government; who benefitted under such settlements; inalienability of land; and perpetuity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Legal History\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"172 - 203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2022.2131527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2022.2131527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纠缠土地财产是中世纪晚期和现代早期及以后欧洲财产法的一个共同特征。Entails在一些欧洲国家比其他国家更常见。本文对波兰(不常见)和英格兰和威尔士(常见)的不同形式的附带财产进行了比较研究。它还与后来的英国普通法中以必然性为核心的严格解决进行了比较分析。它调查是谁建立了这样的定居点;它们的产生原因;不同的创作方法;国家/皇家政府的态度;根据此类和解受益的人;土地不可转让性;以及永久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polish ordynacje and the English common law entail and strict settlement: Social, political, and religious comparative contexts
Entailing landed property was a common feature of European property law in the late medieval and early modern periods, and beyond. Entails were far more common in some European states than others. This article undertakes comparative research into different forms of entailed property in Poland (where entails were uncommon) and England and Wales (where entails were common). It also undertakes comparative analysis with the later English common law strict settlement, which had the entail at its core. It investigates who created such settlements; why they were created; the different methods of creation; the attitude of the state/royal government; who benefitted under such settlements; inalienability of land; and perpetuity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Comparative Legal History is an international and comparative review of law and history. Articles will explore both ''internal'' legal history (doctrinal and disciplinary developments in the law) and ''external'' legal history (legal ideas and institutions in wider contexts). Rooted in the complexity of the various Western legal traditions worldwide, the journal will also investigate other laws and customs from around the globe. Comparisons may be either temporal or geographical and both legal and other law-like normative traditions will be considered. Scholarship on comparative and trans-national historiography, including trans-disciplinary approaches, is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Arbeit und Familie in Nordwesteuropa im Spätmittelalter und in der Frühen Neuzeit / Travail et famille en Europe du Nord-Ouest au bas Moyen Âge et à l’époque moderne We, the King. Creating royal legislation in the sixteenth century Spanish New World The ideal river: how control of nature shaped the international order Intervention and state sovereignty in Central Europe, 1500–1780 Comparative nomogenetics: revisiting Wigmore’s oriental(ist) encounter and the taxonomy of his approach to global legal history
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1