《枪炮、游击队与伟大领袖:朝鲜与第三世界》,本杰明·R·杨著

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of Cold War Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1162/jcws_r_01112
Rosamund Johnston
{"title":"《枪炮、游击队与伟大领袖:朝鲜与第三世界》,本杰明·R·杨著","authors":"Rosamund Johnston","doi":"10.1162/jcws_r_01112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In From Stalin to Mao: Albania and the Socialist World (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2017), Elidor Mëhilli argues that Communism in Albania “engendered a shared material and mental culture across borders without ensuring political unity.” In Guns, Guerrillas, and the Great Leader, Benjamin Young shows the extent to which policymakers and ordinary citizens in another prominent case of Communist heterodoxy— North Korea—drew from, and indeed tried to export, the “party central committees, recognizable slogans, surveillance techniques, censorship rituals, a mental map, and a new vocabulary” that were, for Mëhilli constitutive of the socialist world. Young argues that the relationships forged through the export of such techniques and ideas to Third World states fundamentally “shaped and molded North Korea’s national identity,” causing officials in Pyongyang to foreground autonomy and anti-colonialism as the “core principles” of their state (p. 11). Guns, Guerillas and the Great Leader contributes to research on socialist internationalism by stressing that the Soviet Union was not always the one that laid down the ideological terms for such exchanges. Young’s work additionally reveals the occasional frictions and competition that occurred between Communist states for influence in the Third World. Fostering relations with Third World states was, Young shows, a strategic priority for Communist countries keen to enhance domestic perceptions of their global influence, their standing in international organizations, and their hard currency supplies. Guns, Guerillas and the Great Leader sets out to recover the independent aspirations and impact of “small states” on the Cold War (p. 11). It should additionally be read by scholars interested in the blending of soft and hard power in Communist states’ Cold War diplomacy and the nature and limits of these same states’ autonomy from the Soviet Union. The book considers whether a special subset of Communist states existed—also including Albania—which had more in common with one another than with their nearer regional neighbors on account of what became their “renegade” status (p. 124). Young traces North Korean engagement with the Third World (defined “not [as] a geographic area but a global project . . . that prioritized anti-imperialism and anticolonialism”) from 1956 through 1989 (p. 1). The North Koreans first fostered bilateral relations with seemingly like-minded states such as Indonesia under Sukarno, Cuba under Fidel Castro, and Communist-ruled Vietnam. It then courted the NonAligned Movement (NAM)—which it joined in 1975—to promote the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the Korean peninsula. North Korean leaders quickly grew disillusioned, however, with what they perceived to be the NAM’s crippling lack of consensus. By the 1980s, North Korea turned toward newly independent states in the South Pacific to “extend its diplomatic presence and undermine South Korea” (p. 116). North Korean leader Kim Il-Sung simultaneously made a concerted effort to","PeriodicalId":45551,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cold War Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guns, Guerrillas, and the Great Leader: North Korea and the Third World by Benjamin R. Young\",\"authors\":\"Rosamund Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/jcws_r_01112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In From Stalin to Mao: Albania and the Socialist World (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2017), Elidor Mëhilli argues that Communism in Albania “engendered a shared material and mental culture across borders without ensuring political unity.” In Guns, Guerrillas, and the Great Leader, Benjamin Young shows the extent to which policymakers and ordinary citizens in another prominent case of Communist heterodoxy— North Korea—drew from, and indeed tried to export, the “party central committees, recognizable slogans, surveillance techniques, censorship rituals, a mental map, and a new vocabulary” that were, for Mëhilli constitutive of the socialist world. Young argues that the relationships forged through the export of such techniques and ideas to Third World states fundamentally “shaped and molded North Korea’s national identity,” causing officials in Pyongyang to foreground autonomy and anti-colonialism as the “core principles” of their state (p. 11). Guns, Guerillas and the Great Leader contributes to research on socialist internationalism by stressing that the Soviet Union was not always the one that laid down the ideological terms for such exchanges. Young’s work additionally reveals the occasional frictions and competition that occurred between Communist states for influence in the Third World. Fostering relations with Third World states was, Young shows, a strategic priority for Communist countries keen to enhance domestic perceptions of their global influence, their standing in international organizations, and their hard currency supplies. Guns, Guerillas and the Great Leader sets out to recover the independent aspirations and impact of “small states” on the Cold War (p. 11). It should additionally be read by scholars interested in the blending of soft and hard power in Communist states’ Cold War diplomacy and the nature and limits of these same states’ autonomy from the Soviet Union. The book considers whether a special subset of Communist states existed—also including Albania—which had more in common with one another than with their nearer regional neighbors on account of what became their “renegade” status (p. 124). Young traces North Korean engagement with the Third World (defined “not [as] a geographic area but a global project . . . that prioritized anti-imperialism and anticolonialism”) from 1956 through 1989 (p. 1). The North Koreans first fostered bilateral relations with seemingly like-minded states such as Indonesia under Sukarno, Cuba under Fidel Castro, and Communist-ruled Vietnam. It then courted the NonAligned Movement (NAM)—which it joined in 1975—to promote the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the Korean peninsula. North Korean leaders quickly grew disillusioned, however, with what they perceived to be the NAM’s crippling lack of consensus. By the 1980s, North Korea turned toward newly independent states in the South Pacific to “extend its diplomatic presence and undermine South Korea” (p. 116). North Korean leader Kim Il-Sung simultaneously made a concerted effort to\",\"PeriodicalId\":45551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cold War Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cold War Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/jcws_r_01112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cold War Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jcws_r_01112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guns, Guerrillas, and the Great Leader: North Korea and the Third World by Benjamin R. Young
In From Stalin to Mao: Albania and the Socialist World (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2017), Elidor Mëhilli argues that Communism in Albania “engendered a shared material and mental culture across borders without ensuring political unity.” In Guns, Guerrillas, and the Great Leader, Benjamin Young shows the extent to which policymakers and ordinary citizens in another prominent case of Communist heterodoxy— North Korea—drew from, and indeed tried to export, the “party central committees, recognizable slogans, surveillance techniques, censorship rituals, a mental map, and a new vocabulary” that were, for Mëhilli constitutive of the socialist world. Young argues that the relationships forged through the export of such techniques and ideas to Third World states fundamentally “shaped and molded North Korea’s national identity,” causing officials in Pyongyang to foreground autonomy and anti-colonialism as the “core principles” of their state (p. 11). Guns, Guerillas and the Great Leader contributes to research on socialist internationalism by stressing that the Soviet Union was not always the one that laid down the ideological terms for such exchanges. Young’s work additionally reveals the occasional frictions and competition that occurred between Communist states for influence in the Third World. Fostering relations with Third World states was, Young shows, a strategic priority for Communist countries keen to enhance domestic perceptions of their global influence, their standing in international organizations, and their hard currency supplies. Guns, Guerillas and the Great Leader sets out to recover the independent aspirations and impact of “small states” on the Cold War (p. 11). It should additionally be read by scholars interested in the blending of soft and hard power in Communist states’ Cold War diplomacy and the nature and limits of these same states’ autonomy from the Soviet Union. The book considers whether a special subset of Communist states existed—also including Albania—which had more in common with one another than with their nearer regional neighbors on account of what became their “renegade” status (p. 124). Young traces North Korean engagement with the Third World (defined “not [as] a geographic area but a global project . . . that prioritized anti-imperialism and anticolonialism”) from 1956 through 1989 (p. 1). The North Koreans first fostered bilateral relations with seemingly like-minded states such as Indonesia under Sukarno, Cuba under Fidel Castro, and Communist-ruled Vietnam. It then courted the NonAligned Movement (NAM)—which it joined in 1975—to promote the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the Korean peninsula. North Korean leaders quickly grew disillusioned, however, with what they perceived to be the NAM’s crippling lack of consensus. By the 1980s, North Korea turned toward newly independent states in the South Pacific to “extend its diplomatic presence and undermine South Korea” (p. 116). North Korean leader Kim Il-Sung simultaneously made a concerted effort to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
The Liar: How a Double Agent in the CIA Became the Cold War's Last Honest Man by Benjamin Cunningham Beatriz Allende: A Revolutionary Life in Cold War Latin America by Tanya Harmer The Nonconformists: American and Czech Writers across the Iron Curtain by Brian K. Goodman Beginning of Winter: The George H.W. Bush Administration, the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, and the Emergence of the Post–Cold War World The Autobahn Crises of 1963: The U.S. Military and the Last Major Cold War Showdowns over Berlin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1