650–850/1252–1446年梅坎学术家族的婚姻

Q4 Social Sciences Orient Pub Date : 2019-03-31 DOI:10.5356/orient.54.105
Kaori Otsuya
{"title":"650–850/1252–1446年梅坎学术家族的婚姻","authors":"Kaori Otsuya","doi":"10.5356/orient.54.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although many studies have argued for the frequency of cousin marriages and the significant role of marriage as an opportunity for employment or alliance between two families, extensive case studies on marriages within scholarly families have not been conducted. This paper is a case study on the marriages of four Meccan scholarly families from the mid-thirteenth to the late fifteenth centuries: the Ṭabarī family, the Nuwayrī family, the Fāsī family, and the Ẓuhayra family. It aims to examine the basic characteristics of these mar-riages, including the rate of consanguineous marriages and cousin marriages, and to reveal what kind of marriage strategies each family employed. This study is based primarily on the biographical dictionaries composed by contemporary intellectuals. This study found that, first, each family utilized different marriage strategies. For example, as the only Ḥasanid sharīf family among these four families, the Fāsī family tried to connect with the family of the Meccan amirs who were also the Ḥasanid sharīf s. Second, regarding the general tendency, nearly half of those with marriage records married their paternal relatives, and more than one third of consanguineous marriages were with sons and daughters of paternal uncles. The daughters of Shāfi ʿ ī judges were apparently the most preferred candidates from other families. Among male members of the four scholarly families who married daughters of the Shāfi ʿ ī judges, two-thirds succeeded in attaining the position of judge or deputy judge. In addition, around 40 percent of these men were sons of deputy judges. This indicates that judges and deputy judges tried to keep the legal offices within their extended families. Thus, extended households seem to have had a major role in marriages.","PeriodicalId":35262,"journal":{"name":"Orient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marriages of Meccan Scholarly Families in 650–850/1252–1446\",\"authors\":\"Kaori Otsuya\",\"doi\":\"10.5356/orient.54.105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although many studies have argued for the frequency of cousin marriages and the significant role of marriage as an opportunity for employment or alliance between two families, extensive case studies on marriages within scholarly families have not been conducted. This paper is a case study on the marriages of four Meccan scholarly families from the mid-thirteenth to the late fifteenth centuries: the Ṭabarī family, the Nuwayrī family, the Fāsī family, and the Ẓuhayra family. It aims to examine the basic characteristics of these mar-riages, including the rate of consanguineous marriages and cousin marriages, and to reveal what kind of marriage strategies each family employed. This study is based primarily on the biographical dictionaries composed by contemporary intellectuals. This study found that, first, each family utilized different marriage strategies. For example, as the only Ḥasanid sharīf family among these four families, the Fāsī family tried to connect with the family of the Meccan amirs who were also the Ḥasanid sharīf s. Second, regarding the general tendency, nearly half of those with marriage records married their paternal relatives, and more than one third of consanguineous marriages were with sons and daughters of paternal uncles. The daughters of Shāfi ʿ ī judges were apparently the most preferred candidates from other families. Among male members of the four scholarly families who married daughters of the Shāfi ʿ ī judges, two-thirds succeeded in attaining the position of judge or deputy judge. In addition, around 40 percent of these men were sons of deputy judges. This indicates that judges and deputy judges tried to keep the legal offices within their extended families. Thus, extended households seem to have had a major role in marriages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orient\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orient\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5356/orient.54.105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orient","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5356/orient.54.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管许多研究都认为表亲婚姻的频率以及婚姻作为两个家庭之间就业或结盟的机会所起的重要作用,但尚未对学术家庭中的婚姻进行广泛的案例研究。本文是对十三世纪中期至十五世纪末四个梅坎学术家族婚姻的个案研究:Ṭabarī家族、Nuwayrī家庭、Fāsī家族和Ẓuhayra家族。它旨在研究这些婚姻的基本特征,包括近亲结婚和表亲结婚的比率,并揭示每个家庭采用的婚姻策略。本研究主要以当代知识分子的传记词典为基础。这项研究发现,首先,每个家庭使用不同的婚姻策略。例如,作为Ḥ在这四个家族中,fāsī家族试图与Meccan阿米尔家族建立联系,他们也是Ḥ第二,从总体趋势来看,有婚姻记录的人中,近一半与父系亲属结婚,超过三分之一的近亲婚姻是与父系叔叔的儿子和女儿结婚。什菲法官的女儿显然是其他家庭最喜欢的候选人。在四个与Shāfiʿī法官的女儿结婚的学术家庭的男性成员中,三分之二成功地获得了法官或副法官的职位。此外,这些人中约有40%是副法官的儿子。这表明法官和副法官试图将法律办公室保留在他们的大家庭中。因此,大家庭似乎在婚姻中发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Marriages of Meccan Scholarly Families in 650–850/1252–1446
Although many studies have argued for the frequency of cousin marriages and the significant role of marriage as an opportunity for employment or alliance between two families, extensive case studies on marriages within scholarly families have not been conducted. This paper is a case study on the marriages of four Meccan scholarly families from the mid-thirteenth to the late fifteenth centuries: the Ṭabarī family, the Nuwayrī family, the Fāsī family, and the Ẓuhayra family. It aims to examine the basic characteristics of these mar-riages, including the rate of consanguineous marriages and cousin marriages, and to reveal what kind of marriage strategies each family employed. This study is based primarily on the biographical dictionaries composed by contemporary intellectuals. This study found that, first, each family utilized different marriage strategies. For example, as the only Ḥasanid sharīf family among these four families, the Fāsī family tried to connect with the family of the Meccan amirs who were also the Ḥasanid sharīf s. Second, regarding the general tendency, nearly half of those with marriage records married their paternal relatives, and more than one third of consanguineous marriages were with sons and daughters of paternal uncles. The daughters of Shāfi ʿ ī judges were apparently the most preferred candidates from other families. Among male members of the four scholarly families who married daughters of the Shāfi ʿ ī judges, two-thirds succeeded in attaining the position of judge or deputy judge. In addition, around 40 percent of these men were sons of deputy judges. This indicates that judges and deputy judges tried to keep the legal offices within their extended families. Thus, extended households seem to have had a major role in marriages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orient
Orient Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Father’s Will, Daughter’s Waqf Nobuaki Kondo, Islamic Law and Society in Iran: A Social History of Qajar Tehran (Royal Asiatic Society Books), New York: Routledge, 2017. 210 pp., ISBN: 978-0-415-71137. Female Slaves and Transgression in Medieval Cairo and Damascus The Prophet Muḥammad and Ṣadaqa The Muzhir Family
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1