欧盟暂停反倾销措施是否是新趋势?

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Trade and Customs Journal Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.54648/gtcj2022028
Jin Woo (Jay) Kim
{"title":"欧盟暂停反倾销措施是否是新趋势?","authors":"Jin Woo (Jay) Kim","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Suspension of anti-dumping (‘AD’) measures is an exceptional tool available to the European Commission to be used under exceptional circumstances. In accordance with Article 14(4) of the basic AD Regulation, the Commission may suspend AD measures, if market conditions have temporarily changed to an extent that injury would be unlikely to resume as a result of the suspension. Although the suspension is not common, the Commission decided to suspend AD measures concerning imports of certain aluminium flat-rolled products (‘AFRP’) from China in October 2021. However, the Commission decided not to suspend AD measures concerning imports of birch plywood originating in Russia in December 2021. Better economic performance of Union producers in the post-investigation period (IP), or the absence thereof, was the main difference between the AFRP and birch plywood cases that led the Commission to reach the opposite conclusion. Given that the Commission recently suspended AD measures in the AFRP case, we may see more suspension requests from Union users and importers, and non-EU exporting producers. As a result, the Commission may initiate a few review investigations on suspension. However, the suspension will remain an exceptional tool and we will see a limited of cases of suspension.\nEU trade defense instruments, anti-dumping, suspension","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suspension of Anti-dumping Measures in the EU: A New Trend or Not?\",\"authors\":\"Jin Woo (Jay) Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/gtcj2022028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Suspension of anti-dumping (‘AD’) measures is an exceptional tool available to the European Commission to be used under exceptional circumstances. In accordance with Article 14(4) of the basic AD Regulation, the Commission may suspend AD measures, if market conditions have temporarily changed to an extent that injury would be unlikely to resume as a result of the suspension. Although the suspension is not common, the Commission decided to suspend AD measures concerning imports of certain aluminium flat-rolled products (‘AFRP’) from China in October 2021. However, the Commission decided not to suspend AD measures concerning imports of birch plywood originating in Russia in December 2021. Better economic performance of Union producers in the post-investigation period (IP), or the absence thereof, was the main difference between the AFRP and birch plywood cases that led the Commission to reach the opposite conclusion. Given that the Commission recently suspended AD measures in the AFRP case, we may see more suspension requests from Union users and importers, and non-EU exporting producers. As a result, the Commission may initiate a few review investigations on suspension. However, the suspension will remain an exceptional tool and we will see a limited of cases of suspension.\\nEU trade defense instruments, anti-dumping, suspension\",\"PeriodicalId\":12728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暂停反倾销措施是欧盟委员会在特殊情况下可以使用的一种特殊工具。根据《反倾销基本条例》第14条第(4)款,如果市场状况暂时发生变化,损害不太可能因暂停而恢复,委员会可以暂停反倾销措施。尽管暂停措施并不常见,但委员会于2021年10月决定暂停对从中国进口某些铝扁轧产品的反倾销措施。然而,委员会于2021年12月决定不暂停对原产于俄罗斯的桦树胶合板的进口采取反倾销措施。工会生产商在调查后时期(IP)的经济表现更好,或者没有调查,是AFRP和桦木胶合板案件之间的主要区别,导致委员会得出相反的结论。鉴于欧盟委员会最近暂停了AFRP案件中的AD措施,我们可能会看到欧盟用户和进口商以及非欧盟出口生产商提出更多的暂停请求。因此,委员会可能会启动一些关于停职的审查调查。然而,悬架仍然是一种特殊的工具,我们将看到有限的悬架情况。欧盟贸易防御文书、反倾销、暂停
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Suspension of Anti-dumping Measures in the EU: A New Trend or Not?
Suspension of anti-dumping (‘AD’) measures is an exceptional tool available to the European Commission to be used under exceptional circumstances. In accordance with Article 14(4) of the basic AD Regulation, the Commission may suspend AD measures, if market conditions have temporarily changed to an extent that injury would be unlikely to resume as a result of the suspension. Although the suspension is not common, the Commission decided to suspend AD measures concerning imports of certain aluminium flat-rolled products (‘AFRP’) from China in October 2021. However, the Commission decided not to suspend AD measures concerning imports of birch plywood originating in Russia in December 2021. Better economic performance of Union producers in the post-investigation period (IP), or the absence thereof, was the main difference between the AFRP and birch plywood cases that led the Commission to reach the opposite conclusion. Given that the Commission recently suspended AD measures in the AFRP case, we may see more suspension requests from Union users and importers, and non-EU exporting producers. As a result, the Commission may initiate a few review investigations on suspension. However, the suspension will remain an exceptional tool and we will see a limited of cases of suspension. EU trade defense instruments, anti-dumping, suspension
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Analysis Of The Foreign Subsidies Regulation From An International Trade Law Perspective On Trade In Goods Robotics Process Automation (RPA) And The Import/Export Customs Declaration Process Tackling Cross-Border Subsidies in the EU: The Need to Build on a Promising Start Part 1 The Foreign Subsidies Regulation of the European Union: A New Instrument Levelling the Playing Field? Digitalization in Global Trade: Opportunities and Challenges for Investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1