评估深度学习架构和数据同化,以改进未监测地点的水温预测

IF 2.6 Q2 WATER RESOURCES Frontiers in Water Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.3389/frwa.2023.1184992
J. Zwart, Jeremy Diaz, Scott D. Hamshaw, S. Oliver, Jesse C. Ross, Margaux Sleckman, A. Appling, Hayley Corson-Dosch, X. Jia, J. Read, J. Sadler, Theodore Thompson, David W. Watkins, Elaheh White
{"title":"评估深度学习架构和数据同化,以改进未监测地点的水温预测","authors":"J. Zwart, Jeremy Diaz, Scott D. Hamshaw, S. Oliver, Jesse C. Ross, Margaux Sleckman, A. Appling, Hayley Corson-Dosch, X. Jia, J. Read, J. Sadler, Theodore Thompson, David W. Watkins, Elaheh White","doi":"10.3389/frwa.2023.1184992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly used to forecast water quality variables for use in decision making. Ingesting recent observations of the forecasted variable has been shown to greatly increase model performance at monitored locations; however, observations are not collected at all locations, and methods are not yet well developed for DL models for optimally ingesting recent observations from other sites to inform focal sites. In this paper, we evaluate two different DL model structures, a long short-term memory neural network (LSTM) and a recurrent graph convolutional neural network (RGCN), both with and without data assimilation for forecasting daily maximum stream temperature 7 days into the future at monitored and unmonitored locations in a 70-segment stream network. All our DL models performed well when forecasting stream temperature as the root mean squared error (RMSE) across all models ranged from 2.03 to 2.11°C for 1-day lead times in the validation period, with substantially better performance at gaged locations (RMSE = 1.45–1.52°C) compared to ungaged locations (RMSE = 3.18–3.27°C). Forecast uncertainty characterization was near-perfect for gaged locations but all DL models were overconfident (i.e., uncertainty bounds too narrow) for ungaged locations. Our results show that the RGCN with data assimilation performed best for ungaged locations and especially at higher temperatures (>18°C) which is important for management decisions in our study location. This indicates that the networked model structure and data assimilation techniques may help borrow information from nearby monitored sites to improve forecasts at unmonitored locations. Results from this study can help guide DL modeling decisions when forecasting other important environmental variables.","PeriodicalId":33801,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Water","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating deep learning architecture and data assimilation for improving water temperature forecasts at unmonitored locations\",\"authors\":\"J. Zwart, Jeremy Diaz, Scott D. Hamshaw, S. Oliver, Jesse C. Ross, Margaux Sleckman, A. Appling, Hayley Corson-Dosch, X. Jia, J. Read, J. Sadler, Theodore Thompson, David W. Watkins, Elaheh White\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frwa.2023.1184992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly used to forecast water quality variables for use in decision making. Ingesting recent observations of the forecasted variable has been shown to greatly increase model performance at monitored locations; however, observations are not collected at all locations, and methods are not yet well developed for DL models for optimally ingesting recent observations from other sites to inform focal sites. In this paper, we evaluate two different DL model structures, a long short-term memory neural network (LSTM) and a recurrent graph convolutional neural network (RGCN), both with and without data assimilation for forecasting daily maximum stream temperature 7 days into the future at monitored and unmonitored locations in a 70-segment stream network. All our DL models performed well when forecasting stream temperature as the root mean squared error (RMSE) across all models ranged from 2.03 to 2.11°C for 1-day lead times in the validation period, with substantially better performance at gaged locations (RMSE = 1.45–1.52°C) compared to ungaged locations (RMSE = 3.18–3.27°C). Forecast uncertainty characterization was near-perfect for gaged locations but all DL models were overconfident (i.e., uncertainty bounds too narrow) for ungaged locations. Our results show that the RGCN with data assimilation performed best for ungaged locations and especially at higher temperatures (>18°C) which is important for management decisions in our study location. This indicates that the networked model structure and data assimilation techniques may help borrow information from nearby monitored sites to improve forecasts at unmonitored locations. Results from this study can help guide DL modeling decisions when forecasting other important environmental variables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Water\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1184992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1184992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度学习(DL)模型越来越多地用于预测水质变量,以用于决策。采用预测变量的最新观测结果已被证明可以大大提高监测位置的模型性能;然而,并不是在所有地点都收集到观测结果,DL模型也没有很好地开发出方法,以最佳地吸收来自其他地点的最新观测结果,从而为焦点地点提供信息。在本文中,我们评估了两种不同的DL模型结构,即长短期记忆神经网络(LSTM)和递归图卷积神经网络(RGCN),无论是否进行数据同化,都可以预测70段流网络中监测和未监测位置未来7天的日最高流温。我们所有的DL模型在预测流温度时都表现良好,因为在验证期内的1天交付周期内,所有模型的均方根误差(RMSE)在2.03至2.11°C之间,与未充气位置(RMSE=3.18–3.27°C)相比,在充气位置(均方根误差=1.45–1.52°C)的性能明显更好。对于充气位置,预测不确定性特征几乎是完美的,但对于未充气位置,所有DL模型都过于自信(即不确定性界限太窄)。我们的研究结果表明,具有数据同化的RGCN在未加标签的地点表现最好,尤其是在更高的温度(>18°C)下,这对我们研究地点的管理决策很重要。这表明,网络化的模型结构和数据同化技术可能有助于从附近的监测地点借用信息,以改进未监测地点的预测。这项研究的结果有助于在预测其他重要环境变量时指导DL建模决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating deep learning architecture and data assimilation for improving water temperature forecasts at unmonitored locations
Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly used to forecast water quality variables for use in decision making. Ingesting recent observations of the forecasted variable has been shown to greatly increase model performance at monitored locations; however, observations are not collected at all locations, and methods are not yet well developed for DL models for optimally ingesting recent observations from other sites to inform focal sites. In this paper, we evaluate two different DL model structures, a long short-term memory neural network (LSTM) and a recurrent graph convolutional neural network (RGCN), both with and without data assimilation for forecasting daily maximum stream temperature 7 days into the future at monitored and unmonitored locations in a 70-segment stream network. All our DL models performed well when forecasting stream temperature as the root mean squared error (RMSE) across all models ranged from 2.03 to 2.11°C for 1-day lead times in the validation period, with substantially better performance at gaged locations (RMSE = 1.45–1.52°C) compared to ungaged locations (RMSE = 3.18–3.27°C). Forecast uncertainty characterization was near-perfect for gaged locations but all DL models were overconfident (i.e., uncertainty bounds too narrow) for ungaged locations. Our results show that the RGCN with data assimilation performed best for ungaged locations and especially at higher temperatures (>18°C) which is important for management decisions in our study location. This indicates that the networked model structure and data assimilation techniques may help borrow information from nearby monitored sites to improve forecasts at unmonitored locations. Results from this study can help guide DL modeling decisions when forecasting other important environmental variables.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Water
Frontiers in Water WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
River-floodplain connectivity and residence times controlled by topographic bluffs along a backwater transition Rating curve development and uncertainty analysis in mountainous watersheds for informed hydrology and resource management Characterization of sewage quality and its spatiotemporal variations in a small town in Eastern Guangdong, China Model and remote-sensing-guided experimental design and hypothesis generation for monitoring snow-soil–plant interactions Precipitation fuels dissolved greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, N2O) dynamics in a peatland-dominated headwater stream: results from a continuous monitoring setup
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1