{"title":"变化与偏差","authors":"Pablo E. Requena","doi":"10.1075/lab.21001.req","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Naturalistic production research has reported that, unlike monolingual peers, children acquiring Spanish as a\n heritage language omit Differential Object Marking (DOM) with animate objects since the earliest stages of language development.\n However, the previous studies investigating longitudinal monolingual and bilingual corpora cannot be compared to each other given\n their different treatment of language-internal variation in DOM use along the animacy scale. Whereas monolingual results excluded\n contexts predicted to be variable, bilingual results combined them with categorical contexts increasing the rate of “errors” in\n the bilingual group. This study reexamines naturalistic production by monolingual and early bilingual children as well as by their\n caregivers using a common methodology that distinguishes categorical from variable DOM contexts. The results indicate that\n longitudinal corpora covering child heritage speakers’ development up to age three do not show evidence of greater omission of DOM\n compared to monolingual children once variability along the animacy scale is accounted for. By contrast, young monolingual and\n bilingual children’s use of Spanish DOM seems target-like based on their input.","PeriodicalId":48664,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation versus deviation\",\"authors\":\"Pablo E. Requena\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lab.21001.req\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Naturalistic production research has reported that, unlike monolingual peers, children acquiring Spanish as a\\n heritage language omit Differential Object Marking (DOM) with animate objects since the earliest stages of language development.\\n However, the previous studies investigating longitudinal monolingual and bilingual corpora cannot be compared to each other given\\n their different treatment of language-internal variation in DOM use along the animacy scale. Whereas monolingual results excluded\\n contexts predicted to be variable, bilingual results combined them with categorical contexts increasing the rate of “errors” in\\n the bilingual group. This study reexamines naturalistic production by monolingual and early bilingual children as well as by their\\n caregivers using a common methodology that distinguishes categorical from variable DOM contexts. The results indicate that\\n longitudinal corpora covering child heritage speakers’ development up to age three do not show evidence of greater omission of DOM\\n compared to monolingual children once variability along the animacy scale is accounted for. By contrast, young monolingual and\\n bilingual children’s use of Spanish DOM seems target-like based on their input.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21001.req\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21001.req","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Naturalistic production research has reported that, unlike monolingual peers, children acquiring Spanish as a
heritage language omit Differential Object Marking (DOM) with animate objects since the earliest stages of language development.
However, the previous studies investigating longitudinal monolingual and bilingual corpora cannot be compared to each other given
their different treatment of language-internal variation in DOM use along the animacy scale. Whereas monolingual results excluded
contexts predicted to be variable, bilingual results combined them with categorical contexts increasing the rate of “errors” in
the bilingual group. This study reexamines naturalistic production by monolingual and early bilingual children as well as by their
caregivers using a common methodology that distinguishes categorical from variable DOM contexts. The results indicate that
longitudinal corpora covering child heritage speakers’ development up to age three do not show evidence of greater omission of DOM
compared to monolingual children once variability along the animacy scale is accounted for. By contrast, young monolingual and
bilingual children’s use of Spanish DOM seems target-like based on their input.
期刊介绍:
LAB provides an outlet for cutting-edge, contemporary studies on bilingualism. LAB assumes a broad definition of bilingualism, including: adult L2 acquisition, simultaneous child bilingualism, child L2 acquisition, adult heritage speaker competence, L1 attrition in L2/Ln environments, and adult L3/Ln acquisition. LAB solicits high quality articles of original research assuming any cognitive science approach to understanding the mental representation of bilingual language competence and performance, including cognitive linguistics, emergentism/connectionism, generative theories, psycholinguistic and processing accounts, and covering typical and atypical populations.