直接民主、政治支持和民粹主义——德国联邦的态度模式

IF 1.7 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional and Federal Studies Pub Date : 2021-05-11 DOI:10.1080/13597566.2021.1919876
Kathrin Ackermann, D. Braun, Matthias Fatke, N. Fawzi
{"title":"直接民主、政治支持和民粹主义——德国联邦的态度模式","authors":"Kathrin Ackermann, D. Braun, Matthias Fatke, N. Fawzi","doi":"10.1080/13597566.2021.1919876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Empirical insights on the attitudinal correlates of direct democracy are inconclusive. On the one hand, direct democracy bears a conceptual resemblance with populist ideas. On the other hand, participatory democrats advocate the use of direct democracy precisely on grounds that it promises to educate citizens. This paper complements tests of arguments positing an educative potential of direct democracy with tests of its populist potential. We make use of original survey data collected in the German Bundesländer, which present a relatively underappreciated, yet interesting and representative case for studying direct democracy. Multilevel models indicate that political attitudes are neither more populist nor more supportive of the political system among citizens in direct democratic contexts. The story is more complicated though as the relationship between direct democracy and populist attitudes is conditional on the ideological orientation of a citizen.","PeriodicalId":46657,"journal":{"name":"Regional and Federal Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13597566.2021.1919876","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct democracy, political support and populism–attitudinal patterns in the German Bundesländer\",\"authors\":\"Kathrin Ackermann, D. Braun, Matthias Fatke, N. Fawzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13597566.2021.1919876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Empirical insights on the attitudinal correlates of direct democracy are inconclusive. On the one hand, direct democracy bears a conceptual resemblance with populist ideas. On the other hand, participatory democrats advocate the use of direct democracy precisely on grounds that it promises to educate citizens. This paper complements tests of arguments positing an educative potential of direct democracy with tests of its populist potential. We make use of original survey data collected in the German Bundesländer, which present a relatively underappreciated, yet interesting and representative case for studying direct democracy. Multilevel models indicate that political attitudes are neither more populist nor more supportive of the political system among citizens in direct democratic contexts. The story is more complicated though as the relationship between direct democracy and populist attitudes is conditional on the ideological orientation of a citizen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional and Federal Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13597566.2021.1919876\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional and Federal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1919876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional and Federal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1919876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

关于直接民主的态度相关性的经验见解是不确定的。一方面,直接民主在概念上与民粹主义思想相似。另一方面,参与式民主人士主张使用直接民主,正是因为它承诺教育公民。本文用对直接民主的民粹主义潜力的测试来补充对直接民主教育潜力的论点的测试。我们利用了在德国联邦州收集的原始调查数据,这些数据为研究直接民主提供了一个相对未被重视但有趣且具有代表性的案例。多层次模型表明,在直接民主背景下,公民的政治态度既不更民粹主义,也不更支持政治制度。然而,故事更为复杂,因为直接民主和民粹主义态度之间的关系取决于公民的意识形态取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Direct democracy, political support and populism–attitudinal patterns in the German Bundesländer
ABSTRACT Empirical insights on the attitudinal correlates of direct democracy are inconclusive. On the one hand, direct democracy bears a conceptual resemblance with populist ideas. On the other hand, participatory democrats advocate the use of direct democracy precisely on grounds that it promises to educate citizens. This paper complements tests of arguments positing an educative potential of direct democracy with tests of its populist potential. We make use of original survey data collected in the German Bundesländer, which present a relatively underappreciated, yet interesting and representative case for studying direct democracy. Multilevel models indicate that political attitudes are neither more populist nor more supportive of the political system among citizens in direct democratic contexts. The story is more complicated though as the relationship between direct democracy and populist attitudes is conditional on the ideological orientation of a citizen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Regional and Federal Studies
Regional and Federal Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The upsurge of academic and political interest in regional and federal questions since the 1980s has been stimulated by the salience of regions in EU policy-making and the Structural Funds but also by regionalization and federalization processes in many Western states. The most striking example is the devolution occurring in the UK, but the process is at work all over Europe and in other parts of the world. These developments have led to many important research programmes and projects. Regional and Federal Studies is a refereed social science journal which provides an academic forum for the publication of international research on these issues. It is essential reading for both academics and practitioners in politics, administration and the business world.
期刊最新文献
Australian state and territory elections: regional incumbents matter Moving beyond the second-order election model? Diverging electoral fortunes in Scotland and Wales: national identities, national interests, and voting behavior National political parties or regional movements? The case of Peru’s 2018 regional elections Blame, hope, or gratitude? Voting decisions during the pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1