影响熟练和不熟练理解者阅读过程和阅读后推理处理的因素

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Elementary School Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-20 DOI:10.1086/719477
Sarah E. Carlson, P. Broek, Kristen L. McMaster
{"title":"影响熟练和不熟练理解者阅读过程和阅读后推理处理的因素","authors":"Sarah E. Carlson, P. Broek, Kristen L. McMaster","doi":"10.1086/719477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines factors that influence readers’ cognitive processing (i.e., inference generation) and the development of a mental representation of text: comprehension skill and working memory (WM). Elementary students (N = 61) participated in causal questioning conditions with narrative texts to examine text- and knowledge-based inferences generated when probed during versus after reading. Recalls were examined to assess readers’ mental representations of texts after-reading and answering questions. Skilled comprehenders generated more goal- and subgoal-related text-based inferences during and after reading and included more original text information and less background knowledge in their recalls of texts than did less-skilled comprehenders. Skilled comprehenders with high WM also generated more goal-related text-based inferences than did those with low WM. Findings support and extend previous research regarding how readers struggle with inference generation and may further inform the development of causal questioning interventions to help improve struggling readers’ comprehension of narrative texts.","PeriodicalId":48010,"journal":{"name":"Elementary School Journal","volume":"122 1","pages":"475 - 501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors That Influence Skilled and Less-Skilled Comprehenders’ Inferential Processing During and After Reading\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E. Carlson, P. Broek, Kristen L. McMaster\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/719477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines factors that influence readers’ cognitive processing (i.e., inference generation) and the development of a mental representation of text: comprehension skill and working memory (WM). Elementary students (N = 61) participated in causal questioning conditions with narrative texts to examine text- and knowledge-based inferences generated when probed during versus after reading. Recalls were examined to assess readers’ mental representations of texts after-reading and answering questions. Skilled comprehenders generated more goal- and subgoal-related text-based inferences during and after reading and included more original text information and less background knowledge in their recalls of texts than did less-skilled comprehenders. Skilled comprehenders with high WM also generated more goal-related text-based inferences than did those with low WM. Findings support and extend previous research regarding how readers struggle with inference generation and may further inform the development of causal questioning interventions to help improve struggling readers’ comprehension of narrative texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Elementary School Journal\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"475 - 501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Elementary School Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/719477\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementary School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究考察了影响读者认知加工(即推理生成)和文本心理表征发展的因素:理解技能和工作记忆。小学生(N=61)用叙述性文本参与因果提问条件,以检查在阅读过程中与阅读后探究时产生的文本和基于知识的推理。对回忆进行了检查,以评估读者在阅读和回答问题后对文本的心理表征。熟练的理解者在阅读过程中和阅读后产生了更多与目标和子目标相关的基于文本的推断,并且在对文本的回忆中包含了更多的原始文本信息和更少的背景知识。与低WM的理解者相比,高WM的熟练理解者也产生了更多与目标相关的基于文本的推断。研究结果支持并扩展了先前关于读者如何在推理生成中挣扎的研究,并可能进一步为因果提问干预的发展提供信息,以帮助提高挣扎的读者对叙事文本的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors That Influence Skilled and Less-Skilled Comprehenders’ Inferential Processing During and After Reading
This study examines factors that influence readers’ cognitive processing (i.e., inference generation) and the development of a mental representation of text: comprehension skill and working memory (WM). Elementary students (N = 61) participated in causal questioning conditions with narrative texts to examine text- and knowledge-based inferences generated when probed during versus after reading. Recalls were examined to assess readers’ mental representations of texts after-reading and answering questions. Skilled comprehenders generated more goal- and subgoal-related text-based inferences during and after reading and included more original text information and less background knowledge in their recalls of texts than did less-skilled comprehenders. Skilled comprehenders with high WM also generated more goal-related text-based inferences than did those with low WM. Findings support and extend previous research regarding how readers struggle with inference generation and may further inform the development of causal questioning interventions to help improve struggling readers’ comprehension of narrative texts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Elementary School Journal
Elementary School Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Elementary School Journal has served researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners in the elementary and middle school education for over one hundred years. ESJ publishes peer-reviewed articles dealing with both education theory and research and their implications for teaching practice. In addition, ESJ presents articles that relate the latest research in child development, cognitive psychology, and sociology to school learning and teaching. ESJ prefers to publish original studies that contain data about school and classroom processes in elementary or middle schools while occasionally publishing integrative research reviews and in-depth conceptual analyses of schooling.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and optimization of sequence-based gene regulatory deep learning models. “It’s Just Something That You Have to Do as a Teacher” Front Matter 41 Teachers, 41 Different Ways Predictable Variation in the Implementation of a Curricular Intervention—and Why it Matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1