多组随机向量主成分得分的典型相关分析

IF 0.6 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis Pub Date : 2020-02-05 DOI:10.1285/I20705948V13N1P47
T. Ogura, H. Murakami
{"title":"多组随机向量主成分得分的典型相关分析","authors":"T. Ogura, H. Murakami","doi":"10.1285/I20705948V13N1P47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) is often used to analyze correlations between the variables of two random vectors. As an extension of CCA, multiple-set canonical correlation analysis (MCCA) was proposed to analyze correlations between multiple-set random vectors. However, sometimes interpreting MCCA results may not be as straightforward as interpreting CCA results. Principal CCA (PCCA), which uses CCA between two sets of principal component (PC) scores, was proposed to address these difficulties in CCA. We propose multiple-set PCCA (MPCCA) by applying the idea to multiple-set of PC scores. PCs are ranked in descending order according to the amount of information they contain. Therefore, it is enough to use only a few PC scores from the top instead of using all PC scores. Decreasing the number of PC makes it easy to interpret the result. We confirmed the effectiveness of MPCCA using simulation studies and a practical example.","PeriodicalId":44770,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","volume":"13 1","pages":"47-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canonical Correlation Analysis of Principal Component Scores for Multiple-set Random Vectors\",\"authors\":\"T. Ogura, H. Murakami\",\"doi\":\"10.1285/I20705948V13N1P47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) is often used to analyze correlations between the variables of two random vectors. As an extension of CCA, multiple-set canonical correlation analysis (MCCA) was proposed to analyze correlations between multiple-set random vectors. However, sometimes interpreting MCCA results may not be as straightforward as interpreting CCA results. Principal CCA (PCCA), which uses CCA between two sets of principal component (PC) scores, was proposed to address these difficulties in CCA. We propose multiple-set PCCA (MPCCA) by applying the idea to multiple-set of PC scores. PCs are ranked in descending order according to the amount of information they contain. Therefore, it is enough to use only a few PC scores from the top instead of using all PC scores. Decreasing the number of PC makes it easy to interpret the result. We confirmed the effectiveness of MPCCA using simulation studies and a practical example.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"47-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V13N1P47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V13N1P47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

典型相关分析(CCA)通常用于分析两个随机向量的变量之间的相关性。作为CCA的扩展,提出了多集规范相关分析(MCCA)来分析多集随机向量之间的相关性。然而,有时解释MCCA结果可能不如解释CCA结果那么简单。为了解决CCA中的这些困难,提出了在两组主成分(PC)得分之间使用CCA的主成分CCA(PCCA)。我们将这一思想应用于多组PC分数,提出了多组PCCA(MPCCA)。PC根据其包含的信息量按降序排列。因此,只使用顶部的几个PC分数就足够了,而不是使用所有的PC分数。减少PC的数量使解释结果变得容易。我们通过仿真研究和实例验证了MPCCA的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Canonical Correlation Analysis of Principal Component Scores for Multiple-set Random Vectors
Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) is often used to analyze correlations between the variables of two random vectors. As an extension of CCA, multiple-set canonical correlation analysis (MCCA) was proposed to analyze correlations between multiple-set random vectors. However, sometimes interpreting MCCA results may not be as straightforward as interpreting CCA results. Principal CCA (PCCA), which uses CCA between two sets of principal component (PC) scores, was proposed to address these difficulties in CCA. We propose multiple-set PCCA (MPCCA) by applying the idea to multiple-set of PC scores. PCs are ranked in descending order according to the amount of information they contain. Therefore, it is enough to use only a few PC scores from the top instead of using all PC scores. Decreasing the number of PC makes it easy to interpret the result. We confirmed the effectiveness of MPCCA using simulation studies and a practical example.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Data Analysis of Accuracy of US Weather Forecastes Extended asymmetry model based on logit transformation and decomposition of symmetry for square contingency tables with ordered categories Generalized Quasi Lindley Distribution: Theoretical Properties, Estimation Methods, and Applications Almost unbiased ridge estimator in the count data regression models Does the elimination of work flexibility contribute to reducing wage inequality? Empirical evidence from Ecuador
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1