非洲应对不安全局势的特设安全倡议

IF 1.1 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS African Security Review Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10246029.2022.2134810
Cedric de Coning, Andrew E. Yaw Tchie, Anab Ovidie Grand
{"title":"非洲应对不安全局势的特设安全倡议","authors":"Cedric de Coning, Andrew E. Yaw Tchie, Anab Ovidie Grand","doi":"10.1080/10246029.2022.2134810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article contends that Ad-hoc Security Initiatives (ASI) have developed over the last decade in the Sahel and Lake Chad Basin and represents a new form of African collective security mechanism. The G5 Sahel Force and the Multi-National Joint Task Force emerged from a context-specific need for small clusters of African states to respond collectively to a shared cross-border security threat(s). The existing African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) mechanisms were not specific and responsive enough to meet this emerging need. Despite substantial investments over the last twenty years by the African Union, Regional Economic Community/ Regional Mechanisms and international partners to establish the African Standby Force, this instrument was not agile enough to respond to the type of threats experienced in the greater Sahel region. In this article, we trace the emergence of a new type of ASI, examine how they fill an essential gap and analyse why the African Standby Force was not able to meet this need. We then consider the implications of these developments for the future of the APSA and how closer collaboration between ASIs and APSA can be developed.","PeriodicalId":44882,"journal":{"name":"African Security Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"383 - 398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ad-hoc Security Initiatives, an African response to insecurity\",\"authors\":\"Cedric de Coning, Andrew E. Yaw Tchie, Anab Ovidie Grand\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10246029.2022.2134810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article contends that Ad-hoc Security Initiatives (ASI) have developed over the last decade in the Sahel and Lake Chad Basin and represents a new form of African collective security mechanism. The G5 Sahel Force and the Multi-National Joint Task Force emerged from a context-specific need for small clusters of African states to respond collectively to a shared cross-border security threat(s). The existing African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) mechanisms were not specific and responsive enough to meet this emerging need. Despite substantial investments over the last twenty years by the African Union, Regional Economic Community/ Regional Mechanisms and international partners to establish the African Standby Force, this instrument was not agile enough to respond to the type of threats experienced in the greater Sahel region. In this article, we trace the emergence of a new type of ASI, examine how they fill an essential gap and analyse why the African Standby Force was not able to meet this need. We then consider the implications of these developments for the future of the APSA and how closer collaboration between ASIs and APSA can be developed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Security Review\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"383 - 398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2022.2134810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2022.2134810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要本文认为,特设安全倡议(ASI)在过去十年中在萨赫勒和乍得湖流域发展起来,代表了非洲集体安全机制的一种新形式。萨赫勒五国集团(G5 Sahel Force)和多国联合特遣部队(Multi-National Joint Task Force)是在特定背景下成立的,需要非洲国家的小集群集体应对共同的跨境安全威胁。现有的非洲和平与安全架构机制不够具体,反应不够迅速,无法满足这一新出现的需求。尽管非洲联盟、区域经济共同体/区域机制和国际伙伴在过去二十年中为建立非洲待命部队进行了大量投资,但这一工具不够灵活,无法应对大萨赫勒地区所经历的威胁。在这篇文章中,我们追踪了一种新型ASI的出现,研究了它们如何填补一个重要缺口,并分析了为什么非洲待命部队无法满足这一需求。然后,我们考虑这些发展对APSA未来的影响,以及如何在ASI和APSA之间发展更紧密的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ad-hoc Security Initiatives, an African response to insecurity
ABSTRACT This article contends that Ad-hoc Security Initiatives (ASI) have developed over the last decade in the Sahel and Lake Chad Basin and represents a new form of African collective security mechanism. The G5 Sahel Force and the Multi-National Joint Task Force emerged from a context-specific need for small clusters of African states to respond collectively to a shared cross-border security threat(s). The existing African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) mechanisms were not specific and responsive enough to meet this emerging need. Despite substantial investments over the last twenty years by the African Union, Regional Economic Community/ Regional Mechanisms and international partners to establish the African Standby Force, this instrument was not agile enough to respond to the type of threats experienced in the greater Sahel region. In this article, we trace the emergence of a new type of ASI, examine how they fill an essential gap and analyse why the African Standby Force was not able to meet this need. We then consider the implications of these developments for the future of the APSA and how closer collaboration between ASIs and APSA can be developed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Security Review
African Security Review INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Market warfare strategy and rural armed banditry in Zamfara State, Nigeria Reimagining counter-piracy efforts in the Gulf of Guinea: Lessons from the theory of infrastructure for coordination and information sharing* The Dynamics of African traditional justice systems: Perspectives and prospective Missed or misused opportunity? Social cohesion, national dialogue and peacebuilding in Cameroon Pills, substances and brigandage: Exploring the drug factor in Nigeria’s banditry crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1