陨石铁制品

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Archeologicke Rozhledy Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.35686/ar.2019.8
V. Zavyalov, N. Terekhova
{"title":"陨石铁制品","authors":"V. Zavyalov, N. Terekhova","doi":"10.35686/ar.2019.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The earliest iron artefacts are often presented as products made of meteoritic iron, which is characterised by its high iron content. However, recent studies have shown that high nickel and iron content cannot be taken as a firm criterion for establishing its meteoritic origin. The most effective tool for helping to specify the elemental composition in such cases is a metallographic analysis. It turns out that the material of many artefacts regarded as having been forged from meteoritic iron could in fact be bloomery iron. An analysis of ample yet scattered evidence suggests that the production of items from meteoritic iron could in fact be irregular and sporadic.","PeriodicalId":54176,"journal":{"name":"Archeologicke Rozhledy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meteoritic iron artefacts redux\",\"authors\":\"V. Zavyalov, N. Terekhova\",\"doi\":\"10.35686/ar.2019.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The earliest iron artefacts are often presented as products made of meteoritic iron, which is characterised by its high iron content. However, recent studies have shown that high nickel and iron content cannot be taken as a firm criterion for establishing its meteoritic origin. The most effective tool for helping to specify the elemental composition in such cases is a metallographic analysis. It turns out that the material of many artefacts regarded as having been forged from meteoritic iron could in fact be bloomery iron. An analysis of ample yet scattered evidence suggests that the production of items from meteoritic iron could in fact be irregular and sporadic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archeologicke Rozhledy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archeologicke Rozhledy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35686/ar.2019.8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archeologicke Rozhledy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35686/ar.2019.8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最早的铁制品通常是由陨石铁制成的产品,其特点是铁含量高。然而,最近的研究表明,高镍和高铁含量不能作为确定其陨石起源的可靠标准。在这种情况下,帮助指定元素成分的最有效工具是金相分析。事实证明,许多被认为是由陨石铁锻造而成的人工制品的材料实际上可能是灯笼铁。对大量但零散的证据的分析表明,陨石铁的生产实际上可能是不规则和零星的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meteoritic iron artefacts redux
The earliest iron artefacts are often presented as products made of meteoritic iron, which is characterised by its high iron content. However, recent studies have shown that high nickel and iron content cannot be taken as a firm criterion for establishing its meteoritic origin. The most effective tool for helping to specify the elemental composition in such cases is a metallographic analysis. It turns out that the material of many artefacts regarded as having been forged from meteoritic iron could in fact be bloomery iron. An analysis of ample yet scattered evidence suggests that the production of items from meteoritic iron could in fact be irregular and sporadic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archeologicke Rozhledy
Archeologicke Rozhledy ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Archeologické rozhledy jsou recenzovaný časopis. Příspěvky procházejí recenzním řízením, jehož výsledek slouží k formulaci vyjádření redakce. Za věcný obsah příspěvků odpovídá autor. Příspěvky nejsou honorovány. Nezbytnou součástí každého článku je max. třístránkový český podklad pro překlad, nebo dvou až čtyřstránkový cizojazyčný souhrn, dále český abstrakt postihující cíl práce, v rozsahu 7-12 řádků, a 5-7 klíčových slov, kontaktní adresa autora.
期刊最新文献
Pavel Vařeka a kolektiv autorů: Svědectví archeologie o tzv. cikánském táboře v Letech. Význam histotafonomie a terénní antropologie při rekonstrukci pohřebního ritu kultury se šňůrovou keramikou na Moravě 50 let petroarcheologie. 6. mezinárodní petroarcheologické sympozium, Wrocław 24.–25. 9. 2020 Organické nádoby na vodu ze studny kultury s lineární keramikou v Mohelnici, okr. Šumperk Did they leave or not?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1