拉开K-12学校领导道德推理和道德领导力发展的帷幕

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Research on Leadership Education Pub Date : 2020-05-12 DOI:10.1177/1942775120921213
D. Gurley, Amy L. Dagley
{"title":"拉开K-12学校领导道德推理和道德领导力发展的帷幕","authors":"D. Gurley, Amy L. Dagley","doi":"10.1177/1942775120921213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the Defining Issues Test of moral reasoning, researchers gathered pre- and posttest data from educational leadership students (N = 52) and confidence levels in enacting ethical school leadership, before and after completing a master’s degree program in educational leadership. On a 95-point scale, pretest, postconventional moral reasoning abilities were calculated at M = 33.57. Significantly higher posttest, postconventional moral reasoning (M = 38.80) was determined. Respondent confidence levels in enacting ethical leadership also increased dramatically. Moral reasoning abilities measured far lower than would be expected compared with national norms of adults who had achieved similar levels of education in other professional areas.","PeriodicalId":51853,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Leadership Education","volume":"16 1","pages":"243 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1942775120921213","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulling Back the Curtain on Moral Reasoning and Ethical Leadership Development for K–12 School Leaders\",\"authors\":\"D. Gurley, Amy L. Dagley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1942775120921213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the Defining Issues Test of moral reasoning, researchers gathered pre- and posttest data from educational leadership students (N = 52) and confidence levels in enacting ethical school leadership, before and after completing a master’s degree program in educational leadership. On a 95-point scale, pretest, postconventional moral reasoning abilities were calculated at M = 33.57. Significantly higher posttest, postconventional moral reasoning (M = 38.80) was determined. Respondent confidence levels in enacting ethical leadership also increased dramatically. Moral reasoning abilities measured far lower than would be expected compared with national norms of adults who had achieved similar levels of education in other professional areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Leadership Education\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1942775120921213\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Leadership Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775120921213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Leadership Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775120921213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

使用道德推理的定义问题测试,研究人员收集了教育领导力学生(N=52)的测试前和测试后数据,以及在完成教育领导力硕士学位课程前后制定道德学校领导力的信心水平。在95分的量表上,测试前和常规后的道德推理能力的计算结果为M=33.57。确定了显著更高的后测、后约定道德推理(M=38.80)。受访者对制定道德领导力的信心水平也大幅提高。与在其他专业领域达到类似教育水平的成年人的国家标准相比,道德推理能力远低于预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pulling Back the Curtain on Moral Reasoning and Ethical Leadership Development for K–12 School Leaders
Using the Defining Issues Test of moral reasoning, researchers gathered pre- and posttest data from educational leadership students (N = 52) and confidence levels in enacting ethical school leadership, before and after completing a master’s degree program in educational leadership. On a 95-point scale, pretest, postconventional moral reasoning abilities were calculated at M = 33.57. Significantly higher posttest, postconventional moral reasoning (M = 38.80) was determined. Respondent confidence levels in enacting ethical leadership also increased dramatically. Moral reasoning abilities measured far lower than would be expected compared with national norms of adults who had achieved similar levels of education in other professional areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research on Leadership Education
Journal of Research on Leadership Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Are Aspiring Principals Prepared to Lead for Equity? An Exploratory Analysis of the Principal Fellows Typology in North Carolina Principal Preparation in the Arabian Gulf Region: A Comparative Study of Three Countries Examining Leadership Styles in Academic Leaders: A Case Study of a University in Bogotá, Colombia Complexities in Context: Uncovering Differences in School Leaders’ Needs and Mentoring Based on School Environment Resilient Leadership During COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1