专家对导师能力档案的不同看法

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Education Culture and Society Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.15503/jecs2023.1.53.65
A. Hašková, Tereza Guziurová, Slavomira Klimszova, Eva Malá
{"title":"专家对导师能力档案的不同看法","authors":"A. Hašková, Tereza Guziurová, Slavomira Klimszova, Eva Malá","doi":"10.15503/jecs2023.1.53.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The paper focuses on the divergence of views of experts from four European educational institutions on key competences, which would become the basis for a successful performance of a mentor position. They should be taken as the key items of a mentor competence profile.\nMethods. A panel discussion – specifically, a focus group interview as its alternative form – was used to determine how the experts assessed particular competences of the mentor competence profile, i.e. to identify which competences they considered to be the key ones of the mentor competence profile. The panel discussion was led by six focus groups, members of which were experts representing four different countries from six universities: two from Slovakia and the Czech Republic, and one from Hungary and Serbia.\nResults. The intention of the conducted panel discussion was to find a common view and consensus on the key competences required for a successful performance of the mentor position. However, the results of the panel discussion showed a significant divergence of the opinions on the fundamental mentor competences depending on the country the experts were from. Differences in the views on the issue examined by experts representing different institutions from the same country also occurred, but proved to be inconclusive. \nConclusion. Mentoring is currently considered one of the most important means of developing pedagogical competences of future and novice teachers. The results of the conducted panel discussion may contribute to the creation of a platform on which an adequate professional mentor training can be designed.","PeriodicalId":30646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Culture and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Divergence of Experts’ Views on a Mentor Competence Profile\",\"authors\":\"A. Hašková, Tereza Guziurová, Slavomira Klimszova, Eva Malá\",\"doi\":\"10.15503/jecs2023.1.53.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. The paper focuses on the divergence of views of experts from four European educational institutions on key competences, which would become the basis for a successful performance of a mentor position. They should be taken as the key items of a mentor competence profile.\\nMethods. A panel discussion – specifically, a focus group interview as its alternative form – was used to determine how the experts assessed particular competences of the mentor competence profile, i.e. to identify which competences they considered to be the key ones of the mentor competence profile. The panel discussion was led by six focus groups, members of which were experts representing four different countries from six universities: two from Slovakia and the Czech Republic, and one from Hungary and Serbia.\\nResults. The intention of the conducted panel discussion was to find a common view and consensus on the key competences required for a successful performance of the mentor position. However, the results of the panel discussion showed a significant divergence of the opinions on the fundamental mentor competences depending on the country the experts were from. Differences in the views on the issue examined by experts representing different institutions from the same country also occurred, but proved to be inconclusive. \\nConclusion. Mentoring is currently considered one of the most important means of developing pedagogical competences of future and novice teachers. The results of the conducted panel discussion may contribute to the creation of a platform on which an adequate professional mentor training can be designed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education Culture and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2023.1.53.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2023.1.53.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标本文重点研究了来自四个欧洲教育机构的专家对关键能力的看法分歧,这些能力将成为成功履行导师职位的基础。它们应被视为导师能力简介的关键项目。方法。小组讨论——特别是作为其替代形式的焦点小组访谈——用于确定专家如何评估导师能力档案中的特定能力,即确定他们认为哪些能力是导师能力档案的关键能力。小组讨论由六个重点小组领导,其中成员是来自六所大学的四个不同国家的专家:两所来自斯洛伐克和捷克共和国,一所来自匈牙利和塞尔维亚。结果。进行小组讨论的目的是就成功履行导师职位所需的关键能力达成共识。然而,小组讨论的结果显示,根据专家来自哪个国家,对基本导师能力的意见存在重大分歧。代表同一国家不同机构的专家对这一问题的看法也存在分歧,但事实证明没有结论。结论。辅导目前被认为是培养未来教师和新手教师教学能力的最重要手段之一。小组讨论的结果可能有助于建立一个平台,在这个平台上可以设计适当的专业导师培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Divergence of Experts’ Views on a Mentor Competence Profile
Aim. The paper focuses on the divergence of views of experts from four European educational institutions on key competences, which would become the basis for a successful performance of a mentor position. They should be taken as the key items of a mentor competence profile. Methods. A panel discussion – specifically, a focus group interview as its alternative form – was used to determine how the experts assessed particular competences of the mentor competence profile, i.e. to identify which competences they considered to be the key ones of the mentor competence profile. The panel discussion was led by six focus groups, members of which were experts representing four different countries from six universities: two from Slovakia and the Czech Republic, and one from Hungary and Serbia. Results. The intention of the conducted panel discussion was to find a common view and consensus on the key competences required for a successful performance of the mentor position. However, the results of the panel discussion showed a significant divergence of the opinions on the fundamental mentor competences depending on the country the experts were from. Differences in the views on the issue examined by experts representing different institutions from the same country also occurred, but proved to be inconclusive.  Conclusion. Mentoring is currently considered one of the most important means of developing pedagogical competences of future and novice teachers. The results of the conducted panel discussion may contribute to the creation of a platform on which an adequate professional mentor training can be designed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education Culture and Society
Journal of Education Culture and Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
Narrating Chinese Teaching and Learning in Culturally Local Thai Schools The Influence of Ottoman Culture on the Way of life of Albanian Society Motivation and the Psycho-Emotional Reaction of Volunteers in War-Time The Dynamics of Motivation and Social Atmosphere of the Classroom in the Process of Pedagogical Intervention of Reading Comprehension Objective Feedback: The Views of Pedagogical Study Programme Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1