外伤性延髓尿道狭窄的肌神经保留法简易重建

M. Arya
{"title":"外伤性延髓尿道狭窄的肌神经保留法简易重建","authors":"M. Arya","doi":"10.33552/aun.2020.02.000536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Anastomotic urethroplasty in traumatic bulbar stricture is successful in 90-95% of cases, but for post-void dribble and ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD). Here, we present modified muscle and nerve-sparing urethroplasty to overcome these problems. Material and Methodology: A retrospective analysis (from January 2015- January 2019) of 55 patients with traumatic bulbar stricture managed by standard urethroplasty (Group 1, N=30) and modified urethroplasty (Group2, N=25) was done. The comparison also included their post-operative EjD and post-void dribble. Results: Mean age of patients was 31.12 (15-55) years. Mean length of stricture was 1.41 [1-2] cm. Mean Qmax was 27.8 and 26.4ml/s in the modified and standard urethroplasty group (P-value>0.05). EjD was calculated for each patient using questions from male sexual health questionnaire (MSHQ)and MSHQ mean scores pertaining to ejaculation had a significant difference between Group1 and Group2 with mean post- operative scores of 14.17 and 21.12 respectively (p-value- <0.005) At 1-year, ten patients (33%) from Group 1 while one patient (4%) in the Group 2 showed post-void dribbling respectively (P-value-0.007). Discussion: Success rate (patient not needing post-operative intervention) was 100% in modified and 96.66% in standard urethroplasty group. Results in terms of EjD and post-void dribble were statistically significant. Conclusion: In traumatic bulbar stricture, muscle and nerve-sparing urethroplasty is associated with statistically significant better outcomes in terms of EjD and post-void dribble.","PeriodicalId":93263,"journal":{"name":"Annals of urology & nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traumatic Bulbar Urethral Stricture: Improvised Reconstruction with Muscle and Nerve Sparing Approach\",\"authors\":\"M. Arya\",\"doi\":\"10.33552/aun.2020.02.000536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Anastomotic urethroplasty in traumatic bulbar stricture is successful in 90-95% of cases, but for post-void dribble and ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD). Here, we present modified muscle and nerve-sparing urethroplasty to overcome these problems. Material and Methodology: A retrospective analysis (from January 2015- January 2019) of 55 patients with traumatic bulbar stricture managed by standard urethroplasty (Group 1, N=30) and modified urethroplasty (Group2, N=25) was done. The comparison also included their post-operative EjD and post-void dribble. Results: Mean age of patients was 31.12 (15-55) years. Mean length of stricture was 1.41 [1-2] cm. Mean Qmax was 27.8 and 26.4ml/s in the modified and standard urethroplasty group (P-value>0.05). EjD was calculated for each patient using questions from male sexual health questionnaire (MSHQ)and MSHQ mean scores pertaining to ejaculation had a significant difference between Group1 and Group2 with mean post- operative scores of 14.17 and 21.12 respectively (p-value- <0.005) At 1-year, ten patients (33%) from Group 1 while one patient (4%) in the Group 2 showed post-void dribbling respectively (P-value-0.007). Discussion: Success rate (patient not needing post-operative intervention) was 100% in modified and 96.66% in standard urethroplasty group. Results in terms of EjD and post-void dribble were statistically significant. Conclusion: In traumatic bulbar stricture, muscle and nerve-sparing urethroplasty is associated with statistically significant better outcomes in terms of EjD and post-void dribble.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of urology & nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of urology & nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33552/aun.2020.02.000536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of urology & nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/aun.2020.02.000536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:吻合口尿道成形术治疗外伤性球根狭窄成功率为90-95%,但可治疗排尿后运球和射精功能障碍(EjD)。在此,我们提出改良的肌肉和神经保留尿道成形术来克服这些问题。材料和方法:回顾性分析(自2015年1月至2019年1月)55例经标准尿道成形术(第1组,N=30)和改良尿道成形法(第2组,N=25)治疗的外伤性延髓狭窄患者。比较还包括他们术后的EjD和空位后的运球。结果:患者的平均年龄为31.12(15-55)岁。狭窄的平均长度为1.41[1-2]cm。改良和标准尿道成形术组的平均Qmax分别为27.8和26.4ml/s(P值>0.05)。使用男性性健康问卷(MSHQ)中的问题计算每个患者的EjD,MSHQ与射精有关的平均得分在第1组和第2组之间有显著差异,术后平均得分分别为14.17和21.12(P值<0.005),第1组10例(33%),第2组1例(4%)出现术后排尿(P值-0.007)。EjD和空位后运球的结果具有统计学意义。结论:在外伤性延髓狭窄中,保留肌肉和神经的尿道成形术在EjD和空隙后运球方面具有统计学意义的更好结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Traumatic Bulbar Urethral Stricture: Improvised Reconstruction with Muscle and Nerve Sparing Approach
Introduction: Anastomotic urethroplasty in traumatic bulbar stricture is successful in 90-95% of cases, but for post-void dribble and ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD). Here, we present modified muscle and nerve-sparing urethroplasty to overcome these problems. Material and Methodology: A retrospective analysis (from January 2015- January 2019) of 55 patients with traumatic bulbar stricture managed by standard urethroplasty (Group 1, N=30) and modified urethroplasty (Group2, N=25) was done. The comparison also included their post-operative EjD and post-void dribble. Results: Mean age of patients was 31.12 (15-55) years. Mean length of stricture was 1.41 [1-2] cm. Mean Qmax was 27.8 and 26.4ml/s in the modified and standard urethroplasty group (P-value>0.05). EjD was calculated for each patient using questions from male sexual health questionnaire (MSHQ)and MSHQ mean scores pertaining to ejaculation had a significant difference between Group1 and Group2 with mean post- operative scores of 14.17 and 21.12 respectively (p-value- <0.005) At 1-year, ten patients (33%) from Group 1 while one patient (4%) in the Group 2 showed post-void dribbling respectively (P-value-0.007). Discussion: Success rate (patient not needing post-operative intervention) was 100% in modified and 96.66% in standard urethroplasty group. Results in terms of EjD and post-void dribble were statistically significant. Conclusion: In traumatic bulbar stricture, muscle and nerve-sparing urethroplasty is associated with statistically significant better outcomes in terms of EjD and post-void dribble.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Blood Flow Rate of Arteriovenous Access and Mortality in Prevalent Haemodialysis Patients: A Five-Year Prospective Study A Case of Severe Acute Hyperphosphatemia Secondary to Ingestion of Phosphoric Acid Solution Treated with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Considerations in the Management of Covid-19 in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease NSAIDs, Dehydration and Acute Kidney Failure in the Young Adults: An Unrecognized Entity? Traumatic Urethrovaginal Fistula from Female Genital Mutilation Presenting as Bladder Outlet Obstruction: A Rare Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1