印尼EFL大学生语言学习策略使用研究

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REGISTER Journal Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.18326/rgt.v13i2.231-256
A. Rianto
{"title":"印尼EFL大学生语言学习策略使用研究","authors":"A. Rianto","doi":"10.18326/rgt.v13i2.231-256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the use of language learning strategies among 329 Indonesian undergraduate students in their English as foreign language learning. The Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) Version 7.0 for ESL/EFL learners developed by Oxford was employed to measure the students’ EFL learning strategies based on gender, study program, and English proficiency differences. A descriptive analysis and an independent t-test were used to analyze the collected data. The findings showed that the female, the social science, and the higher English proficiency students used overall language learning strategies more frequently in their EFL learning. Metacognitive was the strategy category most used by the students and compensation was the least used one . The memory, cognitive, metacognitive, affective, and social strategy categories were used at a high level and the compensation strategy category , at a moderate level . Although there were significant differences in the use of overall strategy and strategy categories between males and females and between social science and science students, no significant differences were found in use between students with lower and higher English proficiency. The findings had several practical implications in the process of EFL learning, especially in the higher education context. Keywords : Language Learning Strategy, English Proficiency, Gender, SILL, Study Programs","PeriodicalId":40585,"journal":{"name":"REGISTER Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Language Learning Strategy Use among Indonesian EFL University Students\",\"authors\":\"A. Rianto\",\"doi\":\"10.18326/rgt.v13i2.231-256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the use of language learning strategies among 329 Indonesian undergraduate students in their English as foreign language learning. The Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) Version 7.0 for ESL/EFL learners developed by Oxford was employed to measure the students’ EFL learning strategies based on gender, study program, and English proficiency differences. A descriptive analysis and an independent t-test were used to analyze the collected data. The findings showed that the female, the social science, and the higher English proficiency students used overall language learning strategies more frequently in their EFL learning. Metacognitive was the strategy category most used by the students and compensation was the least used one . The memory, cognitive, metacognitive, affective, and social strategy categories were used at a high level and the compensation strategy category , at a moderate level . Although there were significant differences in the use of overall strategy and strategy categories between males and females and between social science and science students, no significant differences were found in use between students with lower and higher English proficiency. The findings had several practical implications in the process of EFL learning, especially in the higher education context. Keywords : Language Learning Strategy, English Proficiency, Gender, SILL, Study Programs\",\"PeriodicalId\":40585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REGISTER Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REGISTER Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i2.231-256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGISTER Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i2.231-256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究调查了329名印尼本科生在英语学习中的语言学习策略使用情况。牛津大学开发的面向ESL/EFL学习者的语言学习策略量表(SILL)7.0版用于衡量学生基于性别、学习项目和英语水平差异的EFL学习策略。使用描述性分析和独立t检验来分析收集的数据。研究结果表明,女性、社会科学和英语水平较高的学生在英语学习中更频繁地使用整体语言学习策略。元认知是学生使用最多的策略类别,补偿是使用最少的策略类别。记忆、认知、元认知、情感和社会策略类别在高水平上使用,补偿策略类别在中等水平上使用。尽管在总体策略和策略类别的使用方面,男性和女性以及社会科学和科学学生之间存在显著差异,但在英语水平较低和较高的学生之间,没有发现显著差异。研究结果对英语学习过程,特别是在高等教育背景下有一些实际意义。关键词:语言学习策略、英语水平、性别、SILL、学习计划
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Study of Language Learning Strategy Use among Indonesian EFL University Students
This study investigated the use of language learning strategies among 329 Indonesian undergraduate students in their English as foreign language learning. The Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) Version 7.0 for ESL/EFL learners developed by Oxford was employed to measure the students’ EFL learning strategies based on gender, study program, and English proficiency differences. A descriptive analysis and an independent t-test were used to analyze the collected data. The findings showed that the female, the social science, and the higher English proficiency students used overall language learning strategies more frequently in their EFL learning. Metacognitive was the strategy category most used by the students and compensation was the least used one . The memory, cognitive, metacognitive, affective, and social strategy categories were used at a high level and the compensation strategy category , at a moderate level . Although there were significant differences in the use of overall strategy and strategy categories between males and females and between social science and science students, no significant differences were found in use between students with lower and higher English proficiency. The findings had several practical implications in the process of EFL learning, especially in the higher education context. Keywords : Language Learning Strategy, English Proficiency, Gender, SILL, Study Programs
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REGISTER Journal
REGISTER Journal Multiple-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
2
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unraveling Gender-related differences in Compliment exchanges: the case of Hijazi Speakers Attitude and Political Ideology of 2024 Indonesian Presidential Candidates Reported in Jakartapost.com A Corpus-Based Lexical Coverage of Coursebooks in Nigeria: A Case Study A Qualitative Analysis of WhatsApp Integration on Speaking Vocabulary Development Unveiling the Lecturers’ and Students' Needs in English for Public Administration Program: Essential Vocabulary Topics, Instructional Methods, and Learning Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1