机构投资者与跨境并购:2000-2008年

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Finance Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1111/irfi.12409
Jinsuk Yang, Qing Hao, Mahmut Yaşar
{"title":"机构投资者与跨境并购:2000-2008年","authors":"Jinsuk Yang,&nbsp;Qing Hao,&nbsp;Mahmut Yaşar","doi":"10.1111/irfi.12409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Using a sample of mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As) from 26 countries over 2000–2018, we find that domestic institutional investors facilitate both domestic and cross-border M&amp;As. The facilitation effect is more pronounced for domestic than cross-border M&amp;As. When the acquirer country has greater financial freedom or better investor protection than the target country, domestic institutional investors facilitate cross-border M&amp;As more effectively. As Ordinary Least Squares regressions are not the best approach regarding cross-border M&amp;As, we confirm that the main results are robust to Zero-inflated Poisson regressions. Foreign institutional investors' influence on cross-border M&amp;As is stronger when the sample excludes the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":46664,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Finance","volume":"23 3","pages":"553-583"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional investors and cross-border mergers and acquisitions: The 2000–2018 period\",\"authors\":\"Jinsuk Yang,&nbsp;Qing Hao,&nbsp;Mahmut Yaşar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/irfi.12409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Using a sample of mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As) from 26 countries over 2000–2018, we find that domestic institutional investors facilitate both domestic and cross-border M&amp;As. The facilitation effect is more pronounced for domestic than cross-border M&amp;As. When the acquirer country has greater financial freedom or better investor protection than the target country, domestic institutional investors facilitate cross-border M&amp;As more effectively. As Ordinary Least Squares regressions are not the best approach regarding cross-border M&amp;As, we confirm that the main results are robust to Zero-inflated Poisson regressions. Foreign institutional investors' influence on cross-border M&amp;As is stronger when the sample excludes the United States.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Finance\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"553-583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irfi.12409\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irfi.12409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用2000年至2018年间来自26个国家的并购样本,我们发现国内机构投资者促进了国内和跨境并购。国内并购的便利化效应比跨境并购更为明显。当收购国比目标国有更大的财务自由或更好的投资者保护时,国内机构投资者更有效地促进了跨境并购。由于普通最小二乘回归不是跨境M&As的最佳方法,我们确认主要结果对零膨胀泊松回归具有鲁棒性。当样本排除美国时,境外机构投资者对跨国并购的影响更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Institutional investors and cross-border mergers and acquisitions: The 2000–2018 period

Using a sample of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) from 26 countries over 2000–2018, we find that domestic institutional investors facilitate both domestic and cross-border M&As. The facilitation effect is more pronounced for domestic than cross-border M&As. When the acquirer country has greater financial freedom or better investor protection than the target country, domestic institutional investors facilitate cross-border M&As more effectively. As Ordinary Least Squares regressions are not the best approach regarding cross-border M&As, we confirm that the main results are robust to Zero-inflated Poisson regressions. Foreign institutional investors' influence on cross-border M&As is stronger when the sample excludes the United States.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Finance
International Review of Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Review of Finance (IRF) publishes high-quality research on all aspects of financial economics, including traditional areas such as asset pricing, corporate finance, market microstructure, financial intermediation and regulation, financial econometrics, financial engineering and risk management, as well as new areas such as markets and institutions of emerging market economies, especially those in the Asia-Pacific region. In addition, the Letters Section in IRF is a premium outlet of letter-length research in all fields of finance. The length of the articles in the Letters Section is limited to a maximum of eight journal pages.
期刊最新文献
The impact of country level investor protection on economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment link Issue Information Trust in the retirement system and investment decisions of property investors Do passive investors influence corporate social responsibility? A risk‐management perspective The impact of democracy on liquidity and information asymmetry for NYSE cross‐listed stocks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1