{"title":"有效性研究评论","authors":"M. Kane","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2019.1702465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As noted in the introduction, we undertook this effort for two reasons, first to encourage assessment developers to undertake relatively comprehensive validity evaluations, and second, to provide some examples of reasonably comprehensive validity studies.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"25 1","pages":"83 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2019.1702465","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity Studies Commentary\",\"authors\":\"M. Kane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10627197.2019.1702465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As noted in the introduction, we undertook this effort for two reasons, first to encourage assessment developers to undertake relatively comprehensive validity evaluations, and second, to provide some examples of reasonably comprehensive validity studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Assessment\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"83 - 89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2019.1702465\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2019.1702465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2019.1702465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT As noted in the introduction, we undertook this effort for two reasons, first to encourage assessment developers to undertake relatively comprehensive validity evaluations, and second, to provide some examples of reasonably comprehensive validity studies.
期刊介绍：
Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
