青年司法新闻

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Youth Justice-An International Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-11 DOI:10.1177/1473225420985092
T. Bateman
{"title":"青年司法新闻","authors":"T. Bateman","doi":"10.1177/1473225420985092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In England and Wales, youth offending teams (YOTs), the statutory multi-agency partnerships with responsibility for providing services to children subject to youth justice interventions, are inspected by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation. The Inspectorate’s Annual Report, published in November 2020, summarises the outcome of those inspections and indicates that children in care are substantially over-represented among those subject to formal youth justice disposals. On 31 March 2019, 78,150 children were looked after by the local authority in England (Wales has devolved responsibility for children’s services and Welsh children are accordingly not included in the data), a rate of 65 per 10,000 children in the population, or 0.65 per cent. By contrast, according to the Probation inspectorate, in the 24,000 cases examined in 2018/2019 of children given a caution or subject to a court order, an estimated 4500 (approaching 19 per cent) were children in care. Although figures are not directly comparable, it would appear too that over-representation rises in line with the level of youth justice intervention. Thus, 26 per cent of cases inspected, over the past 2 years, of children subject to a court disposal (that is omitting those given a pre-court disposal), were ‘in the care of the local authority at some point during their sentence’. Surveys of children detained in young offender institutions (YOIs) and secure training centres (STCs) during 2018/2019 (children in secure children’s homes (SCHs), the third type of custodial establishment are not included in the data) found that more than half (52 per cent) reported having been in care at some point in their lives. The Probation Inspectorate also found that the quality of provision to children in care by YOTs was, on average, of a lower standard than that given to their non-care counterparts. Moreover, as shown in Table 1, where looked-after children were placed outside of their local authority area, the quality of services was further diminished. For that group of cases, planning, delivery and review of interventions were all assessed as requiring improvement on aggregate.","PeriodicalId":45886,"journal":{"name":"Youth Justice-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473225420985092","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Youth Justice News\",\"authors\":\"T. Bateman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1473225420985092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In England and Wales, youth offending teams (YOTs), the statutory multi-agency partnerships with responsibility for providing services to children subject to youth justice interventions, are inspected by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation. The Inspectorate’s Annual Report, published in November 2020, summarises the outcome of those inspections and indicates that children in care are substantially over-represented among those subject to formal youth justice disposals. On 31 March 2019, 78,150 children were looked after by the local authority in England (Wales has devolved responsibility for children’s services and Welsh children are accordingly not included in the data), a rate of 65 per 10,000 children in the population, or 0.65 per cent. By contrast, according to the Probation inspectorate, in the 24,000 cases examined in 2018/2019 of children given a caution or subject to a court order, an estimated 4500 (approaching 19 per cent) were children in care. Although figures are not directly comparable, it would appear too that over-representation rises in line with the level of youth justice intervention. Thus, 26 per cent of cases inspected, over the past 2 years, of children subject to a court disposal (that is omitting those given a pre-court disposal), were ‘in the care of the local authority at some point during their sentence’. Surveys of children detained in young offender institutions (YOIs) and secure training centres (STCs) during 2018/2019 (children in secure children’s homes (SCHs), the third type of custodial establishment are not included in the data) found that more than half (52 per cent) reported having been in care at some point in their lives. The Probation Inspectorate also found that the quality of provision to children in care by YOTs was, on average, of a lower standard than that given to their non-care counterparts. Moreover, as shown in Table 1, where looked-after children were placed outside of their local authority area, the quality of services was further diminished. For that group of cases, planning, delivery and review of interventions were all assessed as requiring improvement on aggregate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Youth Justice-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1473225420985092\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Youth Justice-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225420985092\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth Justice-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225420985092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英格兰和威尔士,青少年犯罪小组(YOT)是一个法定的多机构合作伙伴关系,负责为受青少年司法干预的儿童提供服务,由女王陛下的缓刑监察局进行检查。监察局于2020年11月发布的年度报告总结了这些检查的结果,并指出在接受正式青少年司法处理的儿童中,受照顾儿童的比例明显过高。2019年3月31日,英格兰地方当局照顾了78150名儿童(威尔士已移交儿童服务责任,因此威尔士儿童不包括在数据中),这一比例为人口中每10000名儿童中有65名,即0.65%。相比之下,根据缓刑监察局的数据,在2018/2019年审查的24000起被警告或接受法院命令的儿童案件中,估计有4500名(接近19%)是被照顾的儿童。尽管这些数字无法直接比较,但似乎也会随着青年司法干预的水平而增加。因此,在过去两年中,接受法院处理的儿童案件(即省略了接受庭前处理的案件)中,26%的案件“在服刑期间的某个时候由地方当局照顾”。2018/2019年期间,对被拘留在青少年犯罪机构(YOI)和安全培训中心(STC)的儿童进行的调查(数据中不包括第三类拘留机构安全儿童之家(SCH)中的儿童)发现,超过一半(52%)的儿童报告说,他们在生活中的某个时刻曾受到过照顾。缓刑监察局还发现,青年教师为受照顾儿童提供的服务质量平均低于非受照顾儿童。此外,如表1所示,被照顾的儿童被安置在地方当局辖区之外,服务质量进一步下降。对于这组病例,干预措施的规划、实施和审查都被评估为需要总体改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Youth Justice News
In England and Wales, youth offending teams (YOTs), the statutory multi-agency partnerships with responsibility for providing services to children subject to youth justice interventions, are inspected by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation. The Inspectorate’s Annual Report, published in November 2020, summarises the outcome of those inspections and indicates that children in care are substantially over-represented among those subject to formal youth justice disposals. On 31 March 2019, 78,150 children were looked after by the local authority in England (Wales has devolved responsibility for children’s services and Welsh children are accordingly not included in the data), a rate of 65 per 10,000 children in the population, or 0.65 per cent. By contrast, according to the Probation inspectorate, in the 24,000 cases examined in 2018/2019 of children given a caution or subject to a court order, an estimated 4500 (approaching 19 per cent) were children in care. Although figures are not directly comparable, it would appear too that over-representation rises in line with the level of youth justice intervention. Thus, 26 per cent of cases inspected, over the past 2 years, of children subject to a court disposal (that is omitting those given a pre-court disposal), were ‘in the care of the local authority at some point during their sentence’. Surveys of children detained in young offender institutions (YOIs) and secure training centres (STCs) during 2018/2019 (children in secure children’s homes (SCHs), the third type of custodial establishment are not included in the data) found that more than half (52 per cent) reported having been in care at some point in their lives. The Probation Inspectorate also found that the quality of provision to children in care by YOTs was, on average, of a lower standard than that given to their non-care counterparts. Moreover, as shown in Table 1, where looked-after children were placed outside of their local authority area, the quality of services was further diminished. For that group of cases, planning, delivery and review of interventions were all assessed as requiring improvement on aggregate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Youth Justice-An International Journal
Youth Justice-An International Journal CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Youth Justice is an international, peer-reviewed journal that engages with the analyses of juvenile/youth justice systems, law, policy and practice around the world. It contains articles that are theoretically informed and/or grounded in the latest empirical research. Youth Justice has established itself as the leading journal in the field in the UK, and, supported by an editorial board comprising some of the world"s leading youth justice scholars.
期刊最新文献
The Youth Justice Commute (or the Institutional Construction of Youth Transport Poverty) Overcoming ‘Sheriff Syndrome’: Exploring Young Adults’ Experiences of Policing in Northern Ireland The Right to Participation in Youth Justice Research ‘Won the Battle but Lost the War?’ ‘County Lines’ and the Quest for Victim Status: Reflections and Challenges The Child First Strategy Implementation Project – Translating Strategy Into Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1