不同麻醉技术对非心脏大手术患者中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率和单核细胞淋巴细胞比率的影响:一项前瞻性、单盲、随机研究

Priyanka Boruah, B. Gupta, Ajit Kumar, A. Bhadoria, H. Chandra, Rekha Kumari
{"title":"不同麻醉技术对非心脏大手术患者中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率和单核细胞淋巴细胞比率的影响:一项前瞻性、单盲、随机研究","authors":"Priyanka Boruah, B. Gupta, Ajit Kumar, A. Bhadoria, H. Chandra, Rekha Kumari","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_2_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Various surgical and anesthetic techniques can produce stress. This study aimed to see the changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in patients undergoing major surgery at different time points. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled single blinded study was conducted involving 300 patients, scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgeries, randomly grouped into Group 1 (general anesthesia [GA]), Group 2 (total intravenous anesthesia [TIVA]), and Group 3 (combined spinal and epidural [CSE]). Blood samples were collected for NLR and MLR (preoperatively, end-of-surgery, 6 and 24 h after surgery). Results: There was an increase in NLR in all three groups and increase in mean NLR was highest in group GA at the end of the surgery, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The mean comparison of NLR at 6 and 24 h after surgery was also found to be significant when comparison was made between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.001), and between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.001); however, the difference was found to be insignificant when comparison was made between groups 2 and 3. Conclusion: The mean comparison of NLR at 24 h after surgery was found to be significant when comparison was made between GA and TIVA, GA and CSE; however, the difference was insignificant between-TIVA and CSE groups. Highest rise in the mean NLR 24 h after surgery was found in patients who underwent surgeries under GA than TIVA followed by neuraxial blockade.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different anesthetic techniques on neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and monocyte lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study\",\"authors\":\"Priyanka Boruah, B. Gupta, Ajit Kumar, A. Bhadoria, H. Chandra, Rekha Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_2_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Various surgical and anesthetic techniques can produce stress. This study aimed to see the changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in patients undergoing major surgery at different time points. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled single blinded study was conducted involving 300 patients, scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgeries, randomly grouped into Group 1 (general anesthesia [GA]), Group 2 (total intravenous anesthesia [TIVA]), and Group 3 (combined spinal and epidural [CSE]). Blood samples were collected for NLR and MLR (preoperatively, end-of-surgery, 6 and 24 h after surgery). Results: There was an increase in NLR in all three groups and increase in mean NLR was highest in group GA at the end of the surgery, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The mean comparison of NLR at 6 and 24 h after surgery was also found to be significant when comparison was made between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.001), and between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.001); however, the difference was found to be insignificant when comparison was made between groups 2 and 3. Conclusion: The mean comparison of NLR at 24 h after surgery was found to be significant when comparison was made between GA and TIVA, GA and CSE; however, the difference was insignificant between-TIVA and CSE groups. Highest rise in the mean NLR 24 h after surgery was found in patients who underwent surgeries under GA than TIVA followed by neuraxial blockade.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_2_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_2_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:各种手术和麻醉技术都会产生压力。本研究旨在观察大手术患者在不同时间点中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)的变化。材料和方法:进行了一项前瞻性随机对照单盲研究,涉及300名计划进行选择性非心脏手术的患者,随机分为第1组(全身麻醉[GA])、第2组(全静脉麻醉[TIVA])和第3组(脊髓和硬膜外联合[CSE])。采集NLR和MLR的血样(术前、手术结束、6和24 手术后h)。结果:所有三组的NLR都有所增加,手术结束时,GA组的平均NLR增加幅度最高,分别为6和24 手术后h。NLR在6和24时的平均比较 当在第1组和第2组之间以及在第1和第3组之间进行比较时,术后h也被发现是显著的(P=0.001);然而,当在第2组和第3组之间进行比较时,发现差异是不显著的。结论:24岁时NLR的平均值比较 当比较GA和TIVA、GA和CSE时,发现术后h具有显著性;但TIVA组与CSE组间差异不显著。平均NLR的最高增幅24 在GA下接受手术的患者中,发现术后h比在TIVA下接受神经轴阻滞的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of different anesthetic techniques on neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and monocyte lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study
Background: Various surgical and anesthetic techniques can produce stress. This study aimed to see the changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in patients undergoing major surgery at different time points. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled single blinded study was conducted involving 300 patients, scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgeries, randomly grouped into Group 1 (general anesthesia [GA]), Group 2 (total intravenous anesthesia [TIVA]), and Group 3 (combined spinal and epidural [CSE]). Blood samples were collected for NLR and MLR (preoperatively, end-of-surgery, 6 and 24 h after surgery). Results: There was an increase in NLR in all three groups and increase in mean NLR was highest in group GA at the end of the surgery, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The mean comparison of NLR at 6 and 24 h after surgery was also found to be significant when comparison was made between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.001), and between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.001); however, the difference was found to be insignificant when comparison was made between groups 2 and 3. Conclusion: The mean comparison of NLR at 24 h after surgery was found to be significant when comparison was made between GA and TIVA, GA and CSE; however, the difference was insignificant between-TIVA and CSE groups. Highest rise in the mean NLR 24 h after surgery was found in patients who underwent surgeries under GA than TIVA followed by neuraxial blockade.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Selective Critically ill patients with tracheostomy are eligible for direct from intensive care unit sent home: Case series Comment on: Effects of different anesthetic techniques on neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and monocyte lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study Low procalcitonin clearance correlates with mortality treated with culture-matched antibiotics in intensive care unit: A retrospective, observational study Phenylephrine, ondansetron, or combination of both for prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section: A prospective, double-blind randomized control trial Artificial intelligence in anesthesia and critical care (part 1): Current perspective in critical care setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1