他汀类药物对高血压患者的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY European Journal of Inflammation Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI:10.1177/1721727x221144454
J. Wan, Min Chen
{"title":"他汀类药物对高血压患者的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"J. Wan, Min Chen","doi":"10.1177/1721727x221144454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of statins and placebo on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in patients with hypertension. We used different databases such as MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to search for randomized controlled trials published from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2022 to retrieve relevant studies and full-text articles evaluating statins versus placebo in patients with hypertension. Data were taken from eligible studies. The included articles also performed Cochran’s Q statistics, forest plots, funnel plots, Egger’s test, and sensitivity analyses. This study included 8 studies with a total of 3086 patients. We sought to assess patients' SBP and DBP. The results were expressed as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals. There was no difference in DBP between the statin and placebo groups (MD = 2.48, 95% CI [−2.00, 6.96], p = .28, random effects model). In terms of SBP, the statin group was superior to the placebo group (MD = 4.37, 95% CI [0.72, 8.02], p = .02, random-effects model). Sensitivity analyses and funnel plots showed that our study was robust, with low publication bias. The results show that statins could be clinically more effective than placebo in patients with hypertension.","PeriodicalId":55162,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of statin on hypertension patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Wan, Min Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1721727x221144454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of statins and placebo on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in patients with hypertension. We used different databases such as MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to search for randomized controlled trials published from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2022 to retrieve relevant studies and full-text articles evaluating statins versus placebo in patients with hypertension. Data were taken from eligible studies. The included articles also performed Cochran’s Q statistics, forest plots, funnel plots, Egger’s test, and sensitivity analyses. This study included 8 studies with a total of 3086 patients. We sought to assess patients' SBP and DBP. The results were expressed as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals. There was no difference in DBP between the statin and placebo groups (MD = 2.48, 95% CI [−2.00, 6.96], p = .28, random effects model). In terms of SBP, the statin group was superior to the placebo group (MD = 4.37, 95% CI [0.72, 8.02], p = .02, random-effects model). Sensitivity analyses and funnel plots showed that our study was robust, with low publication bias. The results show that statins could be clinically more effective than placebo in patients with hypertension.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Inflammation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1721727x221144454\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1721727x221144454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进行系统综述和荟萃分析,比较他汀类药物和安慰剂对高血压患者收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的影响。我们使用MEDLINE和Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials(Central)等不同数据库搜索2000年1月1日至2022年1月31日发表的随机对照试验,以检索评估高血压患者他汀类药物与安慰剂的相关研究和全文文章。数据取自符合条件的研究。纳入的文章还进行了Cochran的Q统计、森林图、漏斗图、Egger检验和敏感性分析。本研究包括8项研究,共3086名患者。我们试图评估患者的收缩压和舒张压。结果用95%置信区间的平均差(MD)表示。他汀类药物组和安慰剂组之间的DBP没有差异(MD=2.48,95%CI[-2.00,6.96],p=.28,随机效应模型)。就SBP而言,他汀类药物组优于安慰剂组(MD=4.37,95%CI[0.72,8.02],p=0.02,随机效应模型)。敏感性分析和漏斗图显示,我们的研究是稳健的,发表偏倚低。研究结果表明,他汀类药物在高血压患者中的临床疗效可能比安慰剂更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of statin on hypertension patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of statins and placebo on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in patients with hypertension. We used different databases such as MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to search for randomized controlled trials published from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2022 to retrieve relevant studies and full-text articles evaluating statins versus placebo in patients with hypertension. Data were taken from eligible studies. The included articles also performed Cochran’s Q statistics, forest plots, funnel plots, Egger’s test, and sensitivity analyses. This study included 8 studies with a total of 3086 patients. We sought to assess patients' SBP and DBP. The results were expressed as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals. There was no difference in DBP between the statin and placebo groups (MD = 2.48, 95% CI [−2.00, 6.96], p = .28, random effects model). In terms of SBP, the statin group was superior to the placebo group (MD = 4.37, 95% CI [0.72, 8.02], p = .02, random-effects model). Sensitivity analyses and funnel plots showed that our study was robust, with low publication bias. The results show that statins could be clinically more effective than placebo in patients with hypertension.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Inflammation is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering a wide range of topics in inflammation, including immunology, pathology, pharmacology and related general experimental and clinical research.
期刊最新文献
Alterations and predictive value of blood routine parameters in patients with lupus enteritis: A retrospective study Effects of orthodontic treatment on porphyromonas gingivalis, gingipains and gingival inflammation Experience in early diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum: A case report Enhancing knowledge and practices toward Vitamin D deficiency through implementing awareness programs among medical science female students Pulmonary tuberculosis in a case of acute myeloid leukemia during consolidation chemotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1