Barbara Low和Sabina Spielrein:精神分析史上对他们作品的误读

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AMERICAN IMAGO Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1353/aim.2022.0010
Fátima Caropreso, Richard Theisen Simanke, Frank J. Marchese, Sabina Spielrein, Klara Naszkowska, Dylan James Peterson, Frances L. Restuccia, Dany Nobus, Francis Baudry, Ansu Louis, Laurie Wilson
{"title":"Barbara Low和Sabina Spielrein:精神分析史上对他们作品的误读","authors":"Fátima Caropreso, Richard Theisen Simanke, Frank J. Marchese, Sabina Spielrein, Klara Naszkowska, Dylan James Peterson, Frances L. Restuccia, Dany Nobus, Francis Baudry, Ansu Louis, Laurie Wilson","doi":"10.1353/aim.2022.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Freud’s references to Barbara Low’s Nirvana principle and Sabina Spielrein’s destructive instinct in Beyond the pleasure principle shaped how their works were later perceived in psychoanalytic historiography. This article examines this circumstance as exemplary of a predominant Freud-centred viewpoint that can give rise to considerable distortions concerning what one omits and what one emphasizes in the history of psychoanalysis. The objective here is to analyse these distortions and appraise their implications for historical research in this field. For this purpose, we first review the context in which Freud refers to Low and Spielrein in 1920. Next, we re-examine their respective careers and seek to delineate a broader appraisal, considering their writings and other available sources and scholarship. In conclusion, the methodological issues highlighted by this reassessment are briefly discussed.","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barbara Low and Sabina Spielrein: Misrepresentations of Their Works in the History of Psychoanalysis\",\"authors\":\"Fátima Caropreso, Richard Theisen Simanke, Frank J. Marchese, Sabina Spielrein, Klara Naszkowska, Dylan James Peterson, Frances L. Restuccia, Dany Nobus, Francis Baudry, Ansu Louis, Laurie Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/aim.2022.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Freud’s references to Barbara Low’s Nirvana principle and Sabina Spielrein’s destructive instinct in Beyond the pleasure principle shaped how their works were later perceived in psychoanalytic historiography. This article examines this circumstance as exemplary of a predominant Freud-centred viewpoint that can give rise to considerable distortions concerning what one omits and what one emphasizes in the history of psychoanalysis. The objective here is to analyse these distortions and appraise their implications for historical research in this field. For this purpose, we first review the context in which Freud refers to Low and Spielrein in 1920. Next, we re-examine their respective careers and seek to delineate a broader appraisal, considering their writings and other available sources and scholarship. In conclusion, the methodological issues highlighted by this reassessment are briefly discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERICAN IMAGO\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERICAN IMAGO\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2022.0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN IMAGO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2022.0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

摘要:弗洛伊德在《超越快乐原则》中提到了芭芭拉·洛的涅盘原则和萨宾娜·斯皮尔斯坦的破坏本能,这塑造了他们的作品后来在精神分析史学中的看法。这篇文章将这种情况视为以弗洛伊德为中心的主流观点的典范,这种观点可能会导致精神分析史上人们忽略和强调的内容出现相当大的扭曲。这里的目的是分析这些扭曲,并评估它们对该领域历史研究的影响。为此,我们首先回顾了弗洛伊德在1920年提到Low和Spielrein的背景。接下来,我们重新审视他们各自的职业生涯,并考虑到他们的作品和其他可用的来源和学术,寻求描绘一个更广泛的评价。最后,简要讨论了这次重新评估所强调的方法问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barbara Low and Sabina Spielrein: Misrepresentations of Their Works in the History of Psychoanalysis
Abstract:Freud’s references to Barbara Low’s Nirvana principle and Sabina Spielrein’s destructive instinct in Beyond the pleasure principle shaped how their works were later perceived in psychoanalytic historiography. This article examines this circumstance as exemplary of a predominant Freud-centred viewpoint that can give rise to considerable distortions concerning what one omits and what one emphasizes in the history of psychoanalysis. The objective here is to analyse these distortions and appraise their implications for historical research in this field. For this purpose, we first review the context in which Freud refers to Low and Spielrein in 1920. Next, we re-examine their respective careers and seek to delineate a broader appraisal, considering their writings and other available sources and scholarship. In conclusion, the methodological issues highlighted by this reassessment are briefly discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN IMAGO
AMERICAN IMAGO HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Founded in 1939 by Sigmund Freud and Hanns Sachs, AMERICAN IMAGO is the preeminent scholarly journal of psychoanalysis. Appearing quarterly, AMERICAN IMAGO publishes innovative articles on the history and theory of psychoanalysis as well as on the reciprocal relations between psychoanalysis and the broad range of disciplines that constitute the human sciences. Since 2001, the journal has been edited by Peter L. Rudnytsky, who has made each issue a "special issue" and introduced a topical book review section, with a guest editor for every Fall issue.
期刊最新文献
"Anything of Note": Recovering "Lost Life" in the Psychoanalytic Archive Freud and Marie Bonaparte's Correspondence (1925–1939): An Intimate Relationship Nabokov and Freud: Solus Rex vs Oedipus Rex Understanding the Phenomenon of Negative Myths The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis ed. by Vera J. Camden (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1