转变平等的司法视角

Geoffrey Ma
{"title":"转变平等的司法视角","authors":"Geoffrey Ma","doi":"10.1163/15718158-24020004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn law, equality is the antithesis of discrimination. As in many other areas of human rights law, however, the right balance very often has to be achieved between competing arguments which are reasonable on their face but which pull in different directions. How does the law achieve this? Constitutional instruments and statutes of course set out some principles and guidelines, but it is largely left to the courts to determine where the balance lies in any given situation. Such balance can only be reached through a principled, not arbitrary, approach that is ultimately based on the concept of dignity. Such principled approach includes the proportionality exercise.","PeriodicalId":35216,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Perspectives on Transforming Equality\",\"authors\":\"Geoffrey Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718158-24020004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIn law, equality is the antithesis of discrimination. As in many other areas of human rights law, however, the right balance very often has to be achieved between competing arguments which are reasonable on their face but which pull in different directions. How does the law achieve this? Constitutional instruments and statutes of course set out some principles and guidelines, but it is largely left to the courts to determine where the balance lies in any given situation. Such balance can only be reached through a principled, not arbitrary, approach that is ultimately based on the concept of dignity. Such principled approach includes the proportionality exercise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-24020004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-24020004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法律上,平等是歧视的对立面。然而,与人权法的许多其他领域一样,往往必须在表面上合理但方向不同的相互竞争的论点之间实现权利平衡。法律是如何做到这一点的?宪法文书和法规当然规定了一些原则和准则,但在任何特定情况下,平衡在哪里,很大程度上取决于法院。只有通过最终以尊严概念为基础的原则性而非武断的方法才能实现这种平衡。这种原则性做法包括相称性做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Judicial Perspectives on Transforming Equality
In law, equality is the antithesis of discrimination. As in many other areas of human rights law, however, the right balance very often has to be achieved between competing arguments which are reasonable on their face but which pull in different directions. How does the law achieve this? Constitutional instruments and statutes of course set out some principles and guidelines, but it is largely left to the courts to determine where the balance lies in any given situation. Such balance can only be reached through a principled, not arbitrary, approach that is ultimately based on the concept of dignity. Such principled approach includes the proportionality exercise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law is the world’s only law journal offering scholars a forum in which to present comparative, international and national research dealing specifically with issues of law and human rights in the Asia-Pacific region. Neither a lobby group nor tied to any particular ideology, the Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law is a scientific journal dedicated to responding to the need for a periodical publication dealing with the legal challenges of human rights issues in one of the world’s most diverse and dynamic regions.
期刊最新文献
Religious Exemptions and the Constitutionality of Vaccine Mandates in the Philippines Equal Representation of Women in the Superior Judiciary: A Comparative Analysis between Pakistan and the United Kingdom Decriminalisation of Adultery in Taiwan Empathy, a Hallmark of Equality: Shaping Fearlessness Into Transformative Decision-Making and Teaching Microverse, Mezzoverse, Macroverse: Protection Against Discrimination in an Artificialised World?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1